Keïta A, Huneau-Salaün A, Guillot A, Galliot P, Tavares M, Puterflam J
ANSES, Ploufragan-Plouzané Laboratory, Department of Poultry Experimentation, BP53, 22440 Ploufragan, France and European University of Brittany, France and UMT SANIVOL.
ANSES, Ploufragan-Plouzané Laboratory, Unit Epidemiology and Welfare in Poultry and Rabbits BP53, 22440 Ploufragan, France and European University of Brittany, France and UMT SANIVOL.
Poult Sci. 2016 Jul 1;95(7):1609-1616. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew058. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Research was carried out to determine the effectiveness of 4 hatching eggs disinfection processes (i.e., disinfecting products and administration method) using a multi-pronged approach assessing the reduction of microbial eggshell contamination, the effects on worker exposure, hatching results and broiler performance, and, finally, suitability for use in commercial hatcheries. The 4 disinfection processes were: sodium dichlorocyanurate (DC) by thermonebulization, hydrogen peroxide 6% by nebulization (HP6), electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) by fogging, and hydrogen peroxide 30% vapor (HP30). In order to meet commercial hatchery conditions, the tested products were applied in an experimental hatchery by aerial disinfection in a dedicated room, not sprayed directly onto the eggs. Compared to the untreated control group, eggshell microbial load was significantly decreased by over 1 log10 cfu per egg in groups DC and HP30. These results were confirmed during a second experiment. In addition, these 2 products comply with legal requirements on worker exposure. Fertility and hatching results were significantly higher in group HP30 than in group DC, with no impact on chick quality and subsequent broiler performance. Under these study conditions, the disinfection process (i.e., administration of the product, contact with the eggs and aeration) lasted 65 min in group DC vs. 135 min in group HP30. When considering commercial hatchery conditions, this difference in application time confers a clear advantage on the DC process. Moreover, the investment required for HP30 is much higher than for DC. Overall, HP30 presented a clear advantage for hatching results whereas DC is a relatively more practical and less expensive disinfection process. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of hydrogen peroxide vapor as an egg disinfection process. Further research is needed to confirm the results of this study under commercial hatchery conditions.
开展了一项研究,采用多管齐下的方法来确定4种孵化蛋消毒工艺(即消毒产品和施用方法)的有效性,该方法评估了微生物蛋壳污染的减少情况、对工人接触的影响、孵化结果和肉鸡性能,最后评估了其在商业孵化场使用的适用性。这4种消毒工艺分别是:通过热喷雾施用二氯异氰尿酸钠(DC)、通过喷雾施用6%的过氧化氢(HP6)、通过雾化施用电解氧化水(EOW)以及30%过氧化氢蒸汽(HP30)。为了符合商业孵化场的条件,测试产品在一个专门的房间里通过空气消毒应用于实验孵化场,而不是直接喷在蛋上。与未处理的对照组相比,DC组和HP30组的蛋壳微生物负荷显著降低,每枚蛋减少超过1 log10 cfu。这些结果在第二次实验中得到了证实。此外,这两种产品符合关于工人接触的法律要求。HP30组的受精率和孵化率显著高于DC组,对雏鸡质量和随后的肉鸡性能没有影响。在这些研究条件下,DC组的消毒过程(即产品施用、与蛋接触和通风)持续65分钟,而HP30组持续135分钟。考虑到商业孵化场的条件,施用时间的这种差异使DC工艺具有明显优势。此外,HP30所需的投资比DC高得多。总体而言,HP30在孵化结果方面具有明显优势,而DC是一种相对更实用且成本更低的消毒工艺。据我们所知,这是关于使用过氧化氢蒸汽作为蛋消毒工艺的第一份报告。需要进一步研究以在商业孵化场条件下证实本研究的结果。