Department of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Hazards, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Institute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Poult Sci. 2020 May;99(5):2478-2484. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.039. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
The sample consisted of 480 hatching eggs of Japanese quails and was divided into 4 groups. Before the transfer to the incubator, the first group was not disinfected (negative control). In the second group, eggs were disinfected by means of formaldehyde fumigation (positive control). In the third and fourth group, reactive oxygen forms were used for disinfection- perhydrol (HO) and ozone (O), respectively. Eggs were incubated under standard conditions. On the 14th D, eggs were candled, and proportions of fertilized eggs and died embryos were calculated. In addition, samples were collected for microbiological examination. After 17.5 D, the results of the whole hatching were evaluated. Chicks were reared for 14 D. Their survivability and body weight gain were recorded. Disinfection by means of reactive oxygen forms did not prove to be more effective in reducing the number of bacterial colonies on the shell. Reduced hatching and significantly increased mortality in the O group may indicate the negative impact of this gas on developing embryos. The results of hatching from eggs disinfected with HO did not differ from those obtained in control groups. The biggest chicks were obtained from O disinfected eggs. However, during rearing, their growth did not match the one observed for birds in the remaining groups. Chicks hatched from eggs disinfected with HO were characterized by the largest survivability. Disinfection with reactive oxygen forms did not significantly improve the hygiene of hatching eggs, hatching performance, and quality of hatched chicks. Hydrogen peroxide, whose application offered satisfactory hatching results, may be the recommended disinfectant. On the other hand, O appears to be undesirable because of its negative impact on bird embryos.
样本由 480 枚日本鹌鹑孵化蛋组成,分为 4 组。在转移到孵化器之前,第一组未进行消毒(阴性对照)。第二组通过甲醛熏蒸进行消毒(阳性对照)。第三组和第四组分别使用过氢(HO)和臭氧(O)作为消毒剂。鸡蛋在标准条件下孵化。第 14 天进行照蛋,计算受精蛋和死胚的比例。此外,还收集样本进行微生物检查。第 17.5 天评估整个孵化结果。小鸡饲养 14 天。记录其存活率和体重增加。使用活性氧形式进行消毒并没有证明在减少蛋壳上细菌菌落数量方面更有效。O 组孵化率降低且死亡率显著增加,可能表明该气体对胚胎发育有负面影响。用 HO 消毒的鸡蛋孵化结果与对照组没有差异。O 消毒的鸡蛋孵化出的小鸡最大。然而,在饲养过程中,它们的生长与其他组的鸟类观察到的生长情况不匹配。用 HO 消毒的鸡蛋孵化出的小鸡存活率最高。使用活性氧形式消毒并没有显著改善孵化蛋的卫生状况、孵化性能和孵化出的小鸡的质量。过氧化氢的应用提供了令人满意的孵化结果,可能是推荐的消毒剂。另一方面,O 似乎不理想,因为它对鸟类胚胎有负面影响。