Tsuzuki Daisuke, Watanabe Hama, Dan Ippeita, Taga Gentaro
Information Science and Technology Department, National Institute of Technology, Yuge College, 1000 Shimoyuge, Yuge, Kamijima-cho, Ochi-gun, Ehime 794-2593, Japan; Functional Brain Science Laboratory, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 May 1;264:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.02.024. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
The international 10/20 system is not only a fundamental method for describing positioning for electroencephalography (EEG), but also provides intermediate cranial landmarks for the probabilistic spatial registration methods that use a reference-MRI database. However, the presence of the inion, one of the four initial reference landmarks of the international 10/20 system, is inconspicuous and can be difficult to locate on MRIs.
The MinR 10/20 system utilizes only three initial reference points, the nasion (Nz) and the right and left preauricular points (AR and AL), but does not employ the inion (Iz). With the MinR 10/20 system, first the most posterior point on the occipital protuberance, IIz (Imitated Iz), is identified as an exploratory alternative to the Iz point. Next, the other landmarks are calculated according to the conventional international 10/20 system referring to these four reference points (Nz, AL, AR and IIz).
Holistic tendencies for landmark position estimations on the heads and cortices in MNI space did not vary greatly between MinR and international 10/20 systems.
A comparison of MinR and international 10/20 systems applied to seventeen adult head MRIs revealed little variance in holistic tendencies for landmark position estimations on head and cortex surfaces in the MNI coordinate system. Furthermore, variability was smaller with the MinR 10/20 system than with the conventional international 10/20 system.
The MinR 10/20 system proved to be a practical alternative to the conventional international 10/20 system in modern computational spatial analysis for scalp-based brain mapping methods.
国际10/20系统不仅是描述脑电图(EEG)定位的基本方法,还为使用参考MRI数据库的概率空间配准方法提供中间颅骨标志。然而,国际10/20系统的四个初始参考标志之一枕外隆凸并不明显,在MRI上可能难以定位。
MinR 10/20系统仅使用三个初始参考点,即鼻根点(Nz)以及左右耳前点(AR和AL),而不使用枕外隆凸点(Iz)。使用MinR 10/20系统时,首先将枕骨隆突上最靠后的点IIz(模拟Iz点)确定为Iz点的探索性替代点。接下来,根据传统的国际10/20系统,参照这四个参考点(Nz、AL、AR和IIz)计算其他标志点。
在MNI空间中,MinR系统和国际10/20系统对头和皮质上标志点位置估计的整体趋势差异不大。
对17例成人头部MRI应用MinR系统和国际10/20系统进行比较,结果显示在MNI坐标系中,头和皮质表面标志点位置估计的整体趋势差异不大。此外,MinR 10/20系统的变异性小于传统的国际10/20系统。
在基于头皮的脑图谱方法的现代计算空间分析中,MinR 10/20系统被证明是传统国际10/20系统的一种实用替代方法。