Graduate School of System and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan.
Neurosci Res. 2012 Feb;72(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
For functional neuroimaging with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we recently introduced a probabilistic registration method that uses a reference magnetic resonance image (MRI) database instead of the subject's own MRI, and probabilistically registers the NIRS optode or channel positions onto a canonical brain template in the standard stereotactic brain coordinate systems. As an alternative method, we devised an anchor-based registration method utilizing roughly obtained anchor positions on the scalp instead of strictly defined landmarks such as 10/20 landmarks. This method uses a spherical coordinate system to seek a position in the reference MRI database that corresponds to the anchor position, and eventually presents NIRS optode and channel positions in the standard stereotactic brain coordinate system. For comparison against conventional probabilistic registration, we simulated NIRS optode holder placement on 100 synthesized virtual heads, and found holistic tendencies for probe position estimations were similar between the two methods. Comparison among anchor-based probabilistic registration, conventional probabilistic registration, and SPM-based registration via co-registration to a subject's own MRI revealed that intra-method variability was comparable to a small inter-method variability. Thus, anchor-based registration is a practical alternative, especially to avoid burdening a subject and to reduce experimental time.
对于近红外光谱(NIRS)的功能神经影像学,我们最近引入了一种概率配准方法,该方法使用参考磁共振成像(MRI)数据库而不是受试者自身的 MRI,并将 NIRS 光极或通道位置以概率方式配准到标准立体定向脑坐标系中的标准脑模板上。作为一种替代方法,我们设计了一种基于锚点的配准方法,该方法利用头皮上大致获得的锚点位置,而不是严格定义的地标,例如 10/20 地标。该方法使用球坐标系在参考 MRI 数据库中寻找与锚点位置对应的位置,并最终以标准立体定向脑坐标系呈现 NIRS 光极和通道位置。为了与传统的概率配准进行比较,我们在 100 个合成的虚拟头部上模拟了 NIRS 光极支架的放置位置,并发现两种方法的探头位置估计整体趋势相似。基于锚点的概率配准、传统的概率配准和基于 SPM 的配准之间的比较,通过与受试者自身的 MRI 进行共配准,结果表明,各方法内的变异性与较小的方法间变异性相当。因此,基于锚点的配准是一种实用的替代方法,尤其是为了避免受试者的负担并减少实验时间。