Suppr超能文献

短期断指再植成活率中修复静脉数量的影响

Impact of the number of veins repaired in short-term digital replantation survival rate.

作者信息

Efanov J I, Rizis D, Landes G, Bou-Merhi J, Harris P G, Danino M A

机构信息

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service of University of Montreal Hospital Center, Notre-Dame Hospital, 1560 Sherbrooke Street East, Montreal, QC, H2L4M1, Canada.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service of University of Montreal Hospital Center, Notre-Dame Hospital, 1560 Sherbrooke Street East, Montreal, QC, H2L4M1, Canada.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 May;69(5):640-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous congestion/insufficiency plays a major role in failure of finger replantation. Despite acceptable salvage rates with postoperative anticoagulation or leeching, operative technique remains the most important predictor of success. However, there are no indications in the literature on the benefit of anastomosing single versus multiple veins.

METHODS

A retrospective review of finger amputations from 2011 to 2013 was conducted. The analyzed endpoint was the finger survival rate at discharge depending on the number of veins repaired: multiple veins (group 1), only one vein (group 2), or no veins (group 3). Proportions were compared using v2 tests/Fisher's exact tests; p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients with complete digital amputation were operated including 101 fingers. Twenty-seven fingers (26.7%) failed before hospital discharge, with 78% of failures due to venous complications versus 22% with an arterial etiology. Group 2 had 15 replantation failures due to venous causes as opposed to only one from group 1, representing a 1.27-fold (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.34) increased relative risk of failure (p = 0.032). Similarly, five fingers from group 3 suffered venous complications, resulting in a 1.49-fold (95% CI: 1.02, 1.73) increased likelihood of failure in comparison to group 1 (p = 0.008). No significant difference was observed between having only one vein repaired versus none (RR: 1.1792, 95% CI: 0.83, 2.10, p = 0.502).

CONCLUSION

Efforts toward favoring two-vein repair lead to better survival of the replanted fingers. More cases need to be analyzed before formulating conclusions on specific levels of amputation with regard to venous anastomoses.

摘要

背景

静脉淤血/功能不全在手指再植失败中起主要作用。尽管术后抗凝或水蛭疗法的挽救率尚可,但手术技术仍是成功的最重要预测因素。然而,文献中没有关于吻合单根静脉与多根静脉的益处的相关指征。

方法

对2011年至2013年的手指离断病例进行回顾性研究。分析的终点是出院时手指成活率,根据修复静脉的数量分为:多根静脉(第1组)、仅一根静脉(第2组)或未修复静脉(第3组)。使用卡方检验/费舍尔精确检验比较比例;p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

72例完全性断指患者接受了手术,共涉及101根手指。27根手指(26.7%)在出院前失败,其中78%的失败原因是静脉并发症,而动脉原因导致的失败占22%。第2组有15例因静脉原因导致的再植失败,而第1组仅有1例,失败的相对风险增加了1.27倍(95%置信区间(CI):0.99,1.34)(p = 0.032)。同样,第3组有5根手指出现静脉并发症,与第1组相比,失败的可能性增加了1.49倍(95%CI:1.02,1.73)(p = 0.008)。仅修复一根静脉与未修复静脉之间未观察到显著差异(RR:1.1792,95%CI:0.83,2.10,p = 0.502)。

结论

倾向于修复两根静脉的努力可提高再植手指的成活率。在就静脉吻合的特定截肢水平得出结论之前,还需要分析更多病例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验