Kim Won-Young, Park So Hee, Kim Won Young, Huh Jin Won, Hong Sang-Bum, Koh Younsuck, Lim Chae-Man
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
To evaluate the effect of theophylline in patients with ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD).
Patients who required mechanical ventilation at least 72 hours, met the criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial, and had evidence of VIDD by ultrasonography were included in the study.
Of the 40 patients, 21 received theophylline and 19 did not. Clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Assessment of VIDD showed no between-group differences in baseline diaphragmatic excursion (DE) of both hemidiaphragms. Changes in DE from baseline to 72 hours (ΔDE) were significantly higher in the theophylline group than in the nontheophylline group in the right (3.5 ± 4.5 mm vs 0.4 ± 2.1 mm; P = .004) and left (3.2 ± 5.1 mm vs 0.1 ± 4.0 mm; P = .03) hemidiaphragms and in the total DE of both diaphragms (6.9 ± 9.1 mm vs 0.5 ± 5.7 mm; P = .02). In the theophylline group, theophylline was effective for the diaphragms with VIDD, whereas it was not effective for the diaphragms without VIDD. ΔDE in the right (rs = -0.49, P = .006) hemidiaphragm and total Δ DE in both diaphragms (rs = -0.46, P = .01) correlated negatively with weaning time.
Theophylline significantly improved diaphragmatic movements in patients with VIDD. Our results warrant a larger study to determine whether theophylline use has benefits during weaning from mechanical ventilation.
评估茶碱对呼吸机诱发膈肌功能障碍(VIDD)患者的影响。
纳入至少需要机械通气72小时、符合自主呼吸试验标准且超声检查有VIDD证据的患者。
40例患者中,21例接受了茶碱治疗,19例未接受。两组的临床特征相似。VIDD评估显示,两组半膈肌的基线膈肌移动度(DE)无组间差异。从基线到72小时DE的变化(ΔDE),在右侧(3.5±4.5mm对0.4±2.1mm;P = 0.004)和左侧(3.2±5.1mm对0.1±4.0mm;P = 0.03)半膈肌以及双侧膈肌的总DE(6.9±9.1mm对0.5±5.7mm;P = 0.02)方面,茶碱组显著高于非茶碱组。在茶碱组中,茶碱对有VIDD的膈肌有效,而对无VIDD的膈肌无效。右侧半膈肌的ΔDE(rs = -0.49,P = 0.006)和双侧膈肌的总ΔDE(rs = -0.46,P = 0.01)与撤机时间呈负相关。
茶碱显著改善了VIDD患者的膈肌运动。我们的结果值得进行更大规模的研究,以确定使用茶碱在机械通气撤机过程中是否有益。