• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体与传统固定义齿的成本效益分析。

The analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant and conventional fixed dental prosthesis.

作者信息

Chun June Sang, Har Alix, Lim Hyun-Pil, Lim Hoi-Jeong

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

Northwestern University, USA.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Feb;8(1):53-61. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.53. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.53
PMID:26949488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4769890/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study conducted an analysis of cost-effectiveness of the implant and conventional fixed dental prosthesis (CFDP) from a single treatment perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Markov model for cost-effectiveness analysis of the implant and CFDP was carried out over maximum 50 years. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed by the 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC) were also presented. The results from meta-analysis studies were used to determine the survival rates and complication rates of the implant and CFDP. Data regarding the cost of each treatment method were collected from University Dental Hospital and Statistics Korea for 2013. Using the results of the patient satisfaction survey study, quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY) of the implant and CFDP strategy was evaluated with annual discount rate.

RESULTS

When only the direct cost was considered, implants were more cost-effective when the willingness to pay (WTP) was more than 10,000 won at 10(th) year after the treatment, and more cost-effective regardless of the WTP from 20(th) year after the prosthodontic treatment. When the indirect cost was added to the direct cost, implants were more cost-effective only when the WTP was more than 75,000 won at the 10(th) year after the prosthodontic treatment, more than 35,000 won at the 20(th) year after prosthodontic treatment.

CONCLUSION

The CFDP was more cost-effective unless the WTP was more than 75,000 won at the 10(th) year after prosthodontic treatment. But the cost-effectivenss tendency changed from CFDP to implant as time passed.

摘要

目的

本研究从单一治疗角度对种植牙和传统固定义齿(CFDP)的成本效益进行分析。

材料与方法

对种植牙和CFDP进行成本效益分析的马尔可夫模型最长运行50年。通过10000次蒙特卡洛模拟进行概率敏感性分析,并给出成本效益可接受性曲线(CEAC)。荟萃分析研究的结果用于确定种植牙和CFDP的生存率及并发症发生率。从大学牙科医院和韩国统计局收集了2013年每种治疗方法的成本数据。利用患者满意度调查研究的结果,采用年度贴现率评估种植牙和CFDP策略的质量调整义齿年(QAPY)。

结果

仅考虑直接成本时,治疗后第10年支付意愿(WTP)超过10000韩元时,种植牙更具成本效益,修复治疗后第20年起无论WTP如何,种植牙都更具成本效益。当间接成本加入直接成本后,仅在修复治疗后第10年WTP超过75000韩元、第20年超过35000韩元时,种植牙才更具成本效益。

结论

除非修复治疗后第10年WTP超过75000韩元,否则CFDP更具成本效益。但随着时间推移,成本效益趋势从CFDP转变为种植牙。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d9b/4769890/869ed5d58cf3/jap-8-53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d9b/4769890/2a4ef5987be7/jap-8-53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d9b/4769890/aae899e9c71e/jap-8-53-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d9b/4769890/869ed5d58cf3/jap-8-53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d9b/4769890/2a4ef5987be7/jap-8-53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d9b/4769890/aae899e9c71e/jap-8-53-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d9b/4769890/869ed5d58cf3/jap-8-53-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant and conventional fixed dental prosthesis.种植体与传统固定义齿的成本效益分析。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Feb;8(1):53-61. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.53. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Türkiye.土耳其种植体支持的单冠和牙支持固定义齿的成本效益分析。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2024 Jul;42:100979. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis.种植体支持式假牙与传统假牙相比的成本效益。
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Aug 19;53:S0034-89102019000100257. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001066.
4
Cost-effectiveness of molar single-implant versus fixed dental prosthesis.磨牙单颗种植体与固定义齿修复的成本效益分析
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0604-5.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
6
Resistance to Fracture in Fixed Dental Prostheses Over Cemented and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Zirconia Cantilevers in the Anterior Region: An In Vitro Study.前牙区黏接式和螺丝固位式氧化锆基台固定修复体的抗折裂性能:一项体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 May/Jun;35(3):521-529. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7899.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
8
Implant and prosthodontic survival rates with implant fixed complete dental prostheses in the edentulous mandible after at least 5 years: a systematic review.下颌无牙颌患者使用种植体固定全口义齿至少5年后种植体及修复体的存留率:一项系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Oct;16(5):705-17. doi: 10.1111/cid.12036. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
9
Economic evaluation of single-tooth replacement: dental implant versus fixed partial denture.单颗牙缺失修复的经济学评价:种植义齿与固定局部义齿。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):600-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3413.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis of Molar Single Implant Versus Fixed Dental Prosthesis.磨牙单颗种植体与固定义齿修复的成本-效用分析。
Int J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan/Feb;32(1):75-81. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6040.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of an implant treatment in dentistry.牙科学中植入物治疗的成本-效用分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01790-y.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of two attachment systems for mandibular overdenture.两种下颌覆盖义齿附着体系统的成本效果分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jul;31(7):615-624. doi: 10.1111/clr.13599. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis.种植体支持式假牙与传统假牙相比的成本效益。

本文引用的文献

1
FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位的牙种植单冠修复体的有限元分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Apr 15;7(4):817-25. eCollection 2014.
2
Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years.系统评价:纵向研究中,对经过 5 年平均随访的种植体单冠的存活率和生物学、技术及美学并发症发生率的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:2-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x.
3
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Aug 19;53:S0034-89102019000100257. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001066.
4
Comparative study of the usability of two software programs for visualization and analysis of digital orthodontic models.两款用于数字正畸模型可视化与分析的软件程序可用性的比较研究。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Summer;12(3):213-220. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.033. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Cost-effectiveness of molar single-implant versus fixed dental prosthesis.磨牙单颗种植体与固定义齿修复的成本效益分析
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0604-5.
6
Critical review of willingness to pay for clinical oral health interventions.临床口腔健康干预措施支付意愿的批判性评价。
J Dent. 2017 Sep;64:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Single-tooth replacement: factors affecting different prosthetic treatment modalities.
单颗牙缺失修复:影响不同修复治疗方式的因素。
BMC Oral Health. 2011 Dec 21;11:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-34.
4
Cost-effectiveness of endodontic molar retreatment compared with fixed partial dentures and single-tooth implant alternatives.磨牙根管再治疗的成本效益与固定局部义齿和单牙种植体替代方案的比较。
J Endod. 2011 Mar;37(3):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.035.
5
Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of root canal treatment using conventional approaches versus replacement with an implant.评估使用传统方法进行根管治疗与用种植牙替代根管治疗的成本效益。
Int Endod J. 2009 Oct;42(10):874-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01582.x.
6
Cost-effectiveness modeling of dental implant vs. bridge.种植牙与牙桥的成本效益建模
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):583-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01702.x.
7
Cemented-retained vs screw-retained implant restorations: an investigation on 1939 dental implants.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位种植体修复体:对1939颗牙种植体的一项研究。
Minerva Stomatol. 2008 Apr;57(4):167-79.
8
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years.一项对固定局部义齿(FPDs)在至少5年观察期后的生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Dec;15(6):667-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01120.x.
9
The partially edentulous patient: fixed prosthodontics or implant treatment options.部分牙列缺损患者:固定修复或种植治疗方案
Tex Dent J. 2003 Dec;120(12):1148-56.
10
Single-tooth replacement: bridge vs. implant-supported restoration.单颗牙修复:固定桥修复与种植体支持式修复
J Can Dent Assoc. 2000 Sep;66(8):435-8.