团体认知行为疗法与正念减压疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍:一项随机对照试验。

Group CBT versus MBSR for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Goldin Philippe R, Morrison Amanda, Jazaieri Hooria, Brozovich Faith, Heimberg Richard, Gross James J

机构信息

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis.

Department of Psychology, Stanford University.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 May;84(5):427-37. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000092. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate treatment outcome and mediators of cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT) versus mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) versus waitlist (WL) in patients with generalized social anxiety disorder (SAD).

METHOD

One hundred eight unmedicated patients (55.6% female; mean age = 32.7 years, SD = 8.0; 43.5% Caucasian, 39% Asian, 9.3% Hispanic, 8.3% other) were randomized to CBGT versus MBSR versus WL and completed assessments at baseline, posttreatment/WL, and at 1-year follow-up, including the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (primary outcome; Liebowitz, 1987) as well as measures of treatment-related processes.

RESULTS

Linear mixed model analysis showed that CBGT and MBSR both produced greater improvements on most measures compared with WL. Both treatments yielded similar improvements in social anxiety symptoms, cognitive reappraisal frequency and self-efficacy, cognitive distortions, mindfulness skills, attention focusing, and rumination. There were greater decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors following CBGT than MBSR. Mediation analyses revealed that increases in reappraisal frequency, mindfulness skills, attention focusing, and attention shifting, and decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors and cognitive distortions, mediated the impact of both CBGT and MBSR on social anxiety symptoms. However, increases in reappraisal self-efficacy and decreases in avoidance behaviors mediated the impact of CBGT (vs. MBSR) on social anxiety symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

CBGT and MBSR both appear to be efficacious for SAD. However, their effects may be a result of both shared and unique changes in underlying psychological processes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查广泛性社交焦虑障碍(SAD)患者接受认知行为团体治疗(CBGT)、基于正念的减压疗法(MBSR)与等待列表(WL)对照的治疗结果及中介因素。

方法

108名未接受药物治疗的患者(女性占55.6%;平均年龄 = 32.7岁,标准差 = 8.0;43.5%为白种人,39%为亚洲人,9.3%为西班牙裔,8.3%为其他种族)被随机分为CBGT组、MBSR组和WL组,并在基线、治疗后/等待期结束时以及1年随访时完成评估,评估内容包括利博维茨社交焦虑量表 - 自我报告(主要结果;利博维茨,1987年)以及与治疗相关过程的测量指标。

结果

线性混合模型分析表明,与WL组相比,CBGT组和MBSR组在大多数测量指标上均有更大改善。两种治疗方法在社交焦虑症状、认知重新评估频率和自我效能感、认知扭曲、正念技能、注意力集中和反刍思维方面产生了相似的改善。CBGT组在细微回避行为方面的减少幅度大于MBSR组。中介分析显示,重新评估频率、正念技能、注意力集中和注意力转移的增加,以及细微回避行为和认知扭曲的减少,介导了CBGT组和MBSR组对社交焦虑症状的影响。然而,重新评估自我效能感的增加和回避行为的减少介导了CBGT组(相对于MBSR组)对社交焦虑症状的影响。

结论

CBGT和MBSR对SAD似乎均有效。然而,它们的效果可能是潜在心理过程中共同变化和独特变化的结果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索