Van Minh Hoang, Oh Juhwan, Giang Kim Bao, Kien Vu Duy, Nam You-Seon, Lee Chul Ou, Huong Tran Thi Giang, Hoat Luu Ngoc
Hanoi School of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam;
JW LEE Center for Global Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 29;9:29386. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.29386. eCollection 2016.
Knowledge of the aggregate effects of multiple socioeconomic vulnerabilities is important for shedding light on the determinants of growing health inequalities and inequities in maternal healthcare.
This paper describes patterns of inequity in maternal healthcare utilization and analyzes associations between inequity and multiple socioeconomic vulnerabilities among women in Vietnam.
This is a repeated cross-sectional study using data from the Vietnam Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys 2000, 2006, and 2011. Two maternal healthcare indicators were selected: (1) skilled antenatal care and (2) skilled delivery care. Four types of socioeconomic vulnerabilities - low education, ethnic minority, poverty, and rural location - were assessed both as separate explanatory variables and as composite indicators (combinations of three and four vulnerabilities). Pairwise comparisons and adjusted odds ratios were used to assess socioeconomic inequities in maternal healthcare.
In all three surveys, there were increases across the survey years in both the proportions of women who received antenatal care by skilled staff (68.6% in 2000, 90.8% in 2006, and 93.7% in 2011) and the proportions of women who gave birth with assistance from skilled staff (69.9% in 2000, 87.7% in 2006, and 92.9% in 2011). The receipt of antenatal care by skilled staff and birth assistance from skilled health personnel were less common among vulnerable women, especially those with multiple vulnerabilities.
Even though Vietnam has improved its coverage of maternal healthcare on average, policies should target maternal healthcare utilization among women with multiple socioeconomic vulnerabilities. Both multisectoral social policies and health policies are needed to tackle multiple vulnerabilities more effectively by identifying those who are poor, less educated, live in rural areas, and belong to ethnic minority groups.
了解多种社会经济脆弱性的综合影响对于阐明孕产妇保健领域日益扩大的健康不平等和不公平现象的决定因素至关重要。
本文描述了越南妇女在孕产妇保健利用方面的不公平模式,并分析了不公平现象与多种社会经济脆弱性之间的关联。
这是一项重复横断面研究,使用了2000年、2006年和2011年越南多指标类集调查的数据。选择了两个孕产妇保健指标:(1)熟练的产前护理和(2)熟练的分娩护理。评估了四种社会经济脆弱性类型——低教育程度、少数民族、贫困和农村地区——既作为单独的解释变量,也作为综合指标(三种和四种脆弱性的组合)。采用两两比较和调整后的优势比来评估孕产妇保健方面的社会经济不公平现象。
在所有三项调查中,在整个调查年份,接受熟练工作人员产前护理的妇女比例(2000年为68.6%,2006年为90.8%,2011年为93.7%)和在熟练工作人员协助下分娩的妇女比例(2000年为69.9%,2006年为87.7%,2011年为92.9%)均有所增加。脆弱妇女,尤其是那些具有多种脆弱性的妇女,接受熟练工作人员产前护理和熟练卫生人员分娩协助的情况较少见。
尽管越南平均而言提高了孕产妇保健的覆盖率,但政策应针对具有多种社会经济脆弱性的妇女的孕产妇保健利用情况。需要多部门社会政策和卫生政策,通过识别那些贫困、受教育程度低、生活在农村地区且属于少数民族群体的人,更有效地应对多种脆弱性。