Katge Farhin, Shitoot Abhinav, Pammi Thejokrishna, Mithiborwala Sajjad
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):129-35. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.129.
To evaluate microleakage of Nanoionomer (3M ESPE Ketac(™) N100 Light cured Nanoionomer Restorative) and Nanocomposite (3M ESPE Filtek(™) Z350 XT Universal Restorative) restorations, immersed in fruit drink, fresh fruit juice and soft drink.
Eighty caries free maxillary premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose were used for the study. Class V cavities were prepared and restored with Nanocomposite on buccal surface and Nanoionomer on the palatal surface. The teeth were thermocycled following the restoration. The experimental groups comprised of 72 teeth (3 groups comprising 24 teeth each for fruit drink, fresh fruit juice and soft drink), while remaining 8 formed the control group. Each of experimental group was further divided into three subgroups (low, medium and high immersion). The teeth were finally immersed in Rhodamine B dye, sectioned and evaluated under stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses used were Mann-Whitney test and ANOVA test.
The teeth showed statistically significant microleakage as the immersion regime increased. Soft drink group showed highest microleakage followed by fresh fruit juice and fruit drink. Nanocomposite exhibited more microleakage but the comparison was not statistically significant.
The three beverages used in the study affected the microleakage of both restorative materials significantly. The microleakage scores increased as the frequency of the immersions increased. Soft drink caused highest microleakage followed by fresh fruit juice and fruit drink.
评估纳米离子体(3M ESPE Ketac(™) N100光固化纳米离子体修复材料)和纳米复合材料(3M ESPE Filtek(™) Z350 XT通用修复材料)修复体在果汁饮料、新鲜果汁和软饮料中的微渗漏情况。
选取80颗因正畸目的拔除的无龋上颌前磨牙用于本研究。制备V类洞,颊面用纳米复合材料修复,腭面用纳米离子体修复。修复后对牙齿进行热循环处理。实验组包括72颗牙齿(3组,每组24颗,分别浸泡于果汁饮料、新鲜果汁和软饮料中),其余8颗作为对照组。每个实验组再进一步分为三个亚组(低、中、高浸泡组)。最后将牙齿浸泡于罗丹明B染料中,切片并在体视显微镜下评估。采用的统计分析方法为曼-惠特尼检验和方差分析。
随着浸泡时间增加,牙齿的微渗漏具有统计学意义。软饮料组微渗漏最高,其次是新鲜果汁和果汁饮料组。纳米复合材料的微渗漏更多,但差异无统计学意义。
本研究中使用的三种饮料对两种修复材料的微渗漏均有显著影响。微渗漏评分随浸泡频率增加而升高。软饮料导致的微渗漏最高,其次是新鲜果汁和果汁饮料。