Dispenza Franco, Harper Lauren S, Harrigan Megan A
Department of Counseling and Psychological Services.
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Aug;61(3):251-9. doi: 10.1037/rep0000086. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
There exist significant health disparities among both lesbian, gay, bisexual, transexual (LGBT) and disability persons; however, there is a dearth of information regarding the subjective health experiences of LGBT persons living with disabilities (LGBTPWD). As such, the purpose of this study was to understand how LGBTPWD subjectively defined and characterized the meaning of health in their lives.
Using qualitative content analyses procedures outlined by Elo and Kyngäs (2008), we conducted a secondary data analysis using a larger questionnaire study that was administered via the Internet. Participants were originally asked to answer the following prompt, "Describe what it personally means to you to be healthy?" Open-ended responses from 79 participants were thematically analyzed over several inductive and comparative coding iterations by a 3-person research team. Trustworthiness of data analysis was ensured via researcher triangulation, negative case analyses, and researcher reflexivity.
Four dimensions of subjective health emerged during the qualitative analytic process: physical wellness, emotional vitality, functionality, and social engagement.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: There are contextually nuanced characteristics that constitute subjective health for LGBTPWD. These findings could help rehabilitation professionals provide culturally competent interventions. Implications for future research and limitations are provided in the discussion section. (PsycINFO Database Record
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者(LGBT)与残疾人之间存在显著的健康差异;然而,关于残疾LGBT者(LGBTPWD)的主观健康体验的信息却很匮乏。因此,本研究的目的是了解LGBTPWD如何主观界定和描述其生活中健康的意义。
我们采用Elo和Kyngäs(2008年)概述的定性内容分析程序,对一项通过互联网进行的更大规模问卷调查研究的二手数据进行分析。最初要求参与者回答以下问题:“描述对你个人而言健康意味着什么?”由一个三人研究团队对79名参与者的开放式回答进行了多次归纳和比较编码迭代的主题分析。通过研究者三角互证、负面案例分析和研究者反思确保了数据分析的可信度。
在定性分析过程中出现了主观健康的四个维度:身体健康、情绪活力、功能能力和社会参与。
结论/启示:对于LGBTPWD来说,构成主观健康的特征在不同情境下存在细微差别。这些发现有助于康复专业人员提供具有文化胜任力的干预措施。讨论部分给出了对未来研究的启示和局限性。(PsycINFO数据库记录