Curran Emma, Adamson Gary, Stringer Maurice, Rosato Michael, Leavey Gerard
Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Ulster University, Magee College, Northland Rd, Derry, BT48 7JL, Northern Ireland, UK.
School of Psychology, Ulster University, Magee College, Northland Rd, Derry, BT48 7JL, Northern Ireland, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 May;51(5):647-57. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1198-3. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
To examine patterns of childhood adversity, their long-term consequences and the combined effect of different childhood adversity patterns as predictors of subsequent psychopathology.
Secondary analysis of data from the US National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. Using latent class analysis to identify childhood adversity profiles; and using multinomial logistic regression to validate and further explore these profiles with a range of associated demographic and household characteristics. Finally, confirmatory factor analysis substantiated initial latent class analysis findings by investigating a range of mental health diagnoses.
Latent class analysis generated a three-class model of childhood adversity in which 60 % of participants were allocated to a low adversity class; 14 % to a global adversities class (reporting exposures for all the derived latent classes); and 26 % to a domestic emotional and physical abuse class (exposed to a range of childhood adversities). Confirmatory Factor analysis defined an internalising-externalising spectrum to represent lifetime reporting patterns of mental health disorders. Using logistic regression, both adversity groups showed specific gender and race/ethnicity differences, related family discord and increased psychopathology.
We identified underlying patterns in the exposure to childhood adversity and associated mental health. These findings are informative in their description of the configuration of adversities, rather than focusing solely on the cumulative aspect of experience. Amelioration of longer-term negative consequences requires early identification of psychopathology risk factors that can inform protective and preventive interventions. This study highlights the utility of screening for childhood adversities when individuals present with symptoms of psychiatric disorders.
研究童年逆境模式、其长期后果以及不同童年逆境模式的综合影响,作为后续精神病理学的预测因素。
对美国国家酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查的数据进行二次分析。使用潜在类别分析来识别童年逆境概况;并使用多项逻辑回归来验证并进一步探索这些概况与一系列相关人口统计学和家庭特征之间的关系。最后,验证性因素分析通过调查一系列心理健康诊断来证实初始潜在类别分析的结果。
潜在类别分析生成了一个童年逆境的三类模型,其中60%的参与者被分配到低逆境类别;14%被分配到全球逆境类别(报告所有派生潜在类别的暴露情况);26%被分配到家庭情感和身体虐待类别(暴露于一系列童年逆境中)。验证性因素分析定义了一个内化-外化谱,以代表心理健康障碍的终生报告模式。使用逻辑回归,两个逆境组都显示出特定的性别和种族/族裔差异、相关的家庭不和以及精神病理学增加。
我们确定了童年逆境暴露和相关心理健康的潜在模式。这些发现对于描述逆境的构成很有意义,而不是仅仅关注经历的累积方面。改善长期负面后果需要早期识别可指导保护性和预防性干预的精神病理学风险因素。这项研究强调了在个体出现精神疾病症状时筛查童年逆境的效用。