Chen Wang-Sheng, Li Jian-Jun, Hong Lan, Xing Zeng-Bao, Wang Fen, Li Chang-Qing
Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Hainan Province, Haikou 570311, China.
Department of Gynaecology, People's Hospital of Hainan Province, Haikou 570311, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5126074. doi: 10.1155/2016/5126074. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
In this study, articles in English and Chinese were selected from available electronic databases prior to September 2014. The metabolic concentrations and patterns of N-acetylaspartic acid (NAA), Choline (Cho), Creatine (Cr), NAA/Cr, NAA/Cho, and Cho/Cr ratios in radiotherapy-induced radiation encephalopathy by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to quantitatively synthesize findings of these studies. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using random or fixed effective models. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I (2) statistics. The results indicated that a total of 4 researches involving 214 patients met inclusion criteria. Depending on methodologies of selected studies, control groups were referred to as healthy subjects. The combined analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in value of Cr between radiotherapy group and healthy control group (WMD = -1.483, 95% CI: -67.185-64.219, p = 0.965). However, there were significant difference in values of NAA (WMD = -18.227, 95%CI: -36.317--0.137, p = 0.048), Cho (WMD = 38.003, 95%CI: 5.155-70.851, p = 0.023), NAA/Cr (WMD = -1.175, 95%CI: -1.563--0.787, p = 0.000), NAA/Cho (WMD = -1.108, 95%CI: -2.003-0.213, p = 0.015), and Cho/Cr (WMD = -0.773, 95%CI: 0.239-1.307, p = 0.005). In conclusion, MRS can be regarded as an effective and feasible imaging test for radiotherapy-induced radiation encephalopathy in NPC patients.
在本研究中,于2014年9月之前从可用电子数据库中选取英文和中文文章。提取质子磁共振波谱法在放射治疗诱发的放射性脑病中N-乙酰天门冬氨酸(NAA)、胆碱(Cho)、肌酸(Cr)、NAA/Cr、NAA/Cho以及Cho/Cr比值的代谢浓度和模式。进行荟萃分析以定量综合这些研究的结果。使用随机或固定效应模型计算加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。采用Cochrane Q检验和I²统计量评估研究间的异质性。结果表明,共有4项涉及214例患者的研究符合纳入标准。根据所选研究的方法,对照组为健康受试者。合并分析显示,放疗组与健康对照组之间Cr值无显著差异(WMD = -1.483,95%CI:-67.185 - 64.219,p = 0.965)。然而,NAA(WMD = -18.227,95%CI:-36.317 - -0.137,p = 0.0