Williams Arthur Robin, Olfson Mark, Kim June H, Martins Silvia S, Kleber Herbert D
Arthur Robin Williams (
Mark Olfson is a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):480-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0528.
Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have passed laws implementing medical marijuana programs. The nineteen programs that were in operation as of October 2014 collectively had over one million participants. All states (including D.C.) with medical marijuana laws require physicians directly or indirectly to authorize the use of marijuana at their discretion, yet little is known about how medical marijuana programs vary regarding adherence to basic principles of medical practice and associated rates of enrollment. To explore this, we analyzed marijuana programs according to seven components of traditional medical care and pharmaceutical regulation. We then examined enrollment rates, while controlling for potentially confounding state characteristics. We found that fourteen of the twenty-four programs were nonmedical and collectively enrolled 99.4 percent of participants nationwide, with enrollment rates twenty times greater than programs deemed to be "medicalized." Policy makers implementing or amending medical marijuana programs should consider the powerful relationship between less regulation and greater enrollment. Researchers should consider variations across programs when assessing programs' population-level effects.
23个州和哥伦比亚特区已通过实施医用大麻计划的法律。截至2014年10月,19个正在实施的计划共有超过100万名参与者。所有制定了医用大麻法律的州(包括哥伦比亚特区)都要求医生直接或间接地自行决定是否批准使用大麻,但对于医用大麻计划在遵循医疗实践基本原则方面的差异以及相关的登记率,人们知之甚少。为了探究这一点,我们根据传统医疗保健和药品监管的七个组成部分对大麻计划进行了分析。然后,我们在控制可能产生混淆的州特征的同时,研究了登记率。我们发现,24个计划中有14个是非医疗性质的,它们在全国范围内的参与者总数占比达99.4%,其登记率是被视为“医疗化”计划的20倍。实施或修订医用大麻计划的政策制定者应考虑监管较少与登记率较高之间的强大关联。研究人员在评估计划对人群层面的影响时,应考虑各计划之间的差异。