Suppr超能文献

马什哈德冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中开放静脉采集与内镜静脉采集的临床病理比较

Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad.

作者信息

Amouzeshi Ahmad, Teshnisi Mohamad Abbassi, Zirak Nahid, Shamloo Alireza Sepehri, Hoseinikhah Hamid, Alizadeh Behzad, Moeinipour Aliasghar

机构信息

M.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Science, Birjand, Iran.

M.D., Associate Professor, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Atherosclerosis Prevention Research Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Electron Physician. 2016 Jan 15;8(1):1693-700. doi: 10.19082/1693. eCollection 2016 Jan.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Harvesting of the greater saphenous vein is almost an inevitable part of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations, and it is done by two main techniques, i.e., conventional or open vein harvesting (OVH) and the minimally-invasive endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH). This study aimed to compare these two techniques in off-pump CABG procedures with respect to clinical and pathological outcomes.

METHODS

This cohort study was conducted on CABG candidates during a one-year period from October 2013 through September 2014 in the Department of Cardiac Surgery at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Eighty-seven patients voluntarily underwent EVH, and another 86 patients matched for age, gender, and other cardiovascular risk factors were selected for OVH. They were followed up for six weeks, and the main outcome measures were infections of the wound, pain, duration of hospital stay, and the costs of hospitalization. Paired sample t-test, independent t-test, or their non-parametric equivalents and the chi-squared test were used by SPSS version 17.0 for data analysis.

RESULTS

The mean duration of time for vein harvesting was shorter in the EVH group (p < 0.001), and the pain score was lower (p = 0.04). No infections occurred at the site of the wound. The length of hospital stay was not significantly different for the two groups (OVH versus EVH: 8.5 ± 3.3 versus 8.4 ± 3.2 days; p-value: 0.08). Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the EVH group (OVH versus EVH: 5.8 ± 4.7 versus 7.3 ± 2.0 million Tomman; p-value: 0.008), yet no difference was diagnosed with respect to endothelial damage in the vein grafts harvested by the EVH and OVH techniques.

CONCLUSION

EVH is considered as a minimally invasive and safe vein harvesting technique in our Center, and it can reduce the harvesting time and post-operative pain. In addition, its efficiency was similar to that of OVH.

摘要

引言

大隐静脉采集几乎是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术中不可避免的一部分,主要通过两种技术进行,即传统或开放静脉采集(OVH)和微创内镜静脉采集(EVH)。本研究旨在比较这两种技术在非体外循环CABG手术中的临床和病理结果。

方法

本队列研究于2013年10月至2014年9月在马什哈德医科大学心脏外科对CABG候选患者进行。87例患者自愿接受EVH,另外86例年龄、性别和其他心血管危险因素相匹配的患者被选作OVH。对他们进行了六周的随访,主要观察指标为伤口感染、疼痛、住院时间和住院费用。使用SPSS 17.0版采用配对样本t检验、独立t检验或其非参数等效检验以及卡方检验进行数据分析。

结果

EVH组静脉采集的平均时间较短(p < 0.001),疼痛评分较低(p = 0.04)。伤口部位未发生感染。两组的住院时间无显著差异(OVH组与EVH组:8.5±3.3天对8.4±3.2天;p值:0.08)。EVH组的住院费用显著更高(OVH组与EVH组:580±470万托曼对730±200万托曼;p值:0.008),然而,EVH和OVH技术采集的静脉移植物在内皮损伤方面未发现差异。

结论

在我们中心,EVH被认为是一种微创且安全的静脉采集技术,它可以缩短采集时间和术后疼痛。此外,其效率与OVH相似。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting during the Initial Learning Period.初始学习阶段内镜下静脉采集的早期结果
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;48(3):174-9. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.174. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
5
Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns & controversies.内镜下静脉采集:技术、结果、关注点与争议
J Thorac Dis. 2013 Nov;5 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S630-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.10.01.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验