Pathan Azher Banu, Bolla Nagesh, Kavuri Sarath Raj, Sunil Chukka Ram, Damaraju Bhargavi, Pattan Sadhiq Khan
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):31-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.173190.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule obliteration and their durability in use on the dentinal tubules.
Sixty specimens were obtained from 30 extracted sound human maxillary first premolars. Each tooth was mesiodistally sectioned to obtain 30 buccal and 30 lingual surfaces, and enamel was removed in order to simulate hypersensitive dentin. Specimens were divided into four groups with 15 specimens each. Group 1 samples were immersed in artificial saliva, Group 2 samples were coated with Vivasens, Group 3 samples were coated with VOCO Admira Protect, and Group 4 samples were coated with Neo Active Apatite suspension. These specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM) to find out the occluding ability of the respective products. The specimens were brushed to find out their durability for 1 week and 1 month and were examined under SEM.
The results were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test.
Group 1 differed significantly from the Vivasens, Admira, and Neo Active Apatite groups at 5% level of significance (P < 0.05). The Vivasens group differed significantly from the Admira and Neo Active Apatite groups at 5% level of significance (P < 0.05).
The Ormocer-based Admira Protect showed the best results.
本研究旨在评估三种脱敏剂对牙本质小管封闭的有效性及其在牙本质小管上使用的耐久性。
从30颗拔除的健康人上颌第一前磨牙中获取60个标本。将每颗牙齿近远中向切片,获得30个颊面和30个舌面,并去除釉质以模拟敏感牙本质。标本分为四组,每组15个标本。第1组样本浸泡在人工唾液中,第2组样本涂覆Vivasens,第3组样本涂覆VOCO Admira Protect,第4组样本涂覆Neo Active Apatite悬浮液。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下检查这些标本,以了解各产品的封闭能力。对标本进行刷牙处理,以了解其1周和1个月的耐久性,并在SEM下进行检查。
结果采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验进行统计学分析。
第1组与Vivasens组、Admira组和Neo Active Apatite组在5%显著性水平上有显著差异(P < 0.05)。Vivasens组与Admira组和Neo Active Apatite组在5%显著性水平上有显著差异(P < 0.05)。
基于Ormocer的Admira Protect显示出最佳效果。