Department of Periodontology, Government Dental College and Hospital Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17(3):e483-90. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17594.
This randomized, double blind, split mouth study was aimed to compare three dentin desensitizing treatment modalities.
Two hundred sixty teeth of 25 patients; each having at least 2 hypersensitive teeth in each quadrant, were included. Teeth were randomized to 4 groups: Group A treated with 2% NaF solution, Group B received GLUMA®; an aqueous solution of Hydroxy-Ethyl-Methacrylate and Glutarldehyde, (HEMA-G), Group C received iontophoresis with distilled water (placebo) and Group D was treated with NaF-iontophoresis. Pain response was evaluated on a visual analogue scale (VAS), by using tactile, air blast and cold-water stimuli at 0-day, 15-day, 1-month and 3-months interval.
All treatments were effective in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity significantly, Group D and Group B were more effective than Group A and Group C at all time intervals. Group D and Group B were equally effective in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity at 15-day and 1-month interval but Group D was more effective at 3-months.
All treatment modalities were more effective in reducing hypersensitivity than placebo. 2% NaF-iontophoresis and HEMA-G were more effective than 2% NaF local application at all time intervals. But at 3-months, 2% NaF-iontophoresis was more effective than HEMA-G, while placebo produced no significant effect in reduction of hypersensitivity.
本随机、双盲、分口研究旨在比较三种牙本质脱敏治疗方法。
纳入 25 名患者的 260 颗牙齿;每个象限至少有 2 颗敏感牙。将牙齿随机分为 4 组:A 组用 2%氟化钠溶液处理,B 组用 GLUMA®处理,即羟乙基甲基丙烯酸酯和戊二醛的水溶液(HEMA-G),C 组用蒸馏水进行离子导入(安慰剂),D 组用氟化钠离子导入处理。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛反应,通过触觉、空气喷吹和冷水刺激在 0 天、15 天、1 个月和 3 个月时进行评估。
所有治疗方法均能显著降低牙本质敏感性,D 组和 B 组在所有时间间隔均比 A 组和 C 组更有效。D 组和 B 组在 15 天和 1 个月时同样有效降低牙本质敏感性,但 D 组在 3 个月时更有效。
与安慰剂相比,所有治疗方法均能更有效地降低敏感性。2%氟化钠离子导入和 HEMA-G 在所有时间间隔均比 2%氟化钠局部应用更有效。但在 3 个月时,2%氟化钠离子导入比 HEMA-G 更有效,而安慰剂在降低敏感性方面没有显著效果。