用于电子健康记录（EHR）数据二次利用的数据质量本体论。
A Data Quality Ontology for the Secondary Use of EHR Data.
作者信息
Johnson Steven G, Speedie Stuart, Simon Gyorgy, Kumar Vipin, Westra Bonnie L
机构信息
University of Minnesota, Institute for Health Informatics.
University of Minnesota, Department of Computer Science.
出版信息
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1937-46. eCollection 2015.
Abstract
The secondary use of EHR data for research is expected to improve health outcomes for patients, but the benefits will only be realized if the data in the EHR is of sufficient quality to support these uses. A data quality (DQ) ontology was developed to rigorously define concepts and enable automated computation of data quality measures. The healthcare data quality literature was mined for the important terms used to describe data quality concepts and harmonized into an ontology. Four high-level data quality dimensions ("correctness", "consistency", "completeness" and "currency") categorize 19 lower level measures. The ontology serves as an unambiguous vocabulary, which defines concepts more precisely than natural language; it provides a mechanism to automatically compute data quality measures; and is reusable across domains and use cases. A detailed example is presented to demonstrate its utility. The DQ ontology can make data validation more common and reproducible.
摘要
电子健康记录（EHR）数据用于研究的二次利用有望改善患者的健康状况，但只有当EHR中的数据质量足以支持这些用途时，才能实现这些益处。开发了一种数据质量（DQ）本体，以严格定义概念并实现数据质量度量的自动计算。对医疗保健数据质量文献进行挖掘，找出用于描述数据质量概念的重要术语，并将其统一到一个本体中。四个高级数据质量维度（“正确性”、“一致性”、“完整性”和“时效性”）对19个较低级别的度量进行了分类。该本体作为一种明确无误的词汇表，比自然语言更精确地定义概念；它提供了一种自动计算数据质量度量的机制；并且可跨领域和用例重复使用。给出了一个详细的例子来说明其效用。DQ本体可以使数据验证更加普遍和可重复。
相似文献
1
A Data Quality Ontology for the Secondary Use of EHR Data.用于电子健康记录（EHR）数据二次利用的数据质量本体论。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1937-46. eCollection 2015.
2
Application of An Ontology for Characterizing Data Quality For a Secondary Use of EHR Data.一种用于表征电子健康记录（EHR）数据二次使用的数据质量的本体的应用。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Feb 10;7(1):69-88. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-08-RA-0107. eCollection 2016.
3
A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.电子健康记录数据二次使用的统一数据质量评估术语和框架。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Sep 11;4(1):1244. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1244. eCollection 2016.
4
Initializing a hospital-wide data quality program. The AP-HP experience.启动全院范围的数据质量计划。AP-HP 的经验。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Nov;181:104804. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
Structuring, reuse and analysis of electronic dental data using the Oral Health and Disease Ontology.利用口腔健康与疾病本体对电子牙科数据进行结构化、再利用和分析。
J Biomed Semantics. 2020 Aug 20;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13326-020-00222-0.
6
EHR-based disease registries to support integrated care in a health neighbourhood: an ontology-based methodology.基于电子健康记录的疾病登记系统，以支持健康社区的综合医疗服务：一种基于本体的方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:171-5.
7
Integrating electronic health record information to support integrated care: practical application of ontologies to improve the accuracy of diabetes disease registers.整合电子健康记录信息以支持综合护理：本体论在提高糖尿病疾病登记准确性方面的实际应用。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:364-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
A reusable ontology for primitive and complex HL7 FHIR data types.一种用于基本和复杂HL7 FHIR数据类型的可重用本体。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:2547-50. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318911.
9
Matching Ontologies to HL7 FHIR Towards Their Syntactic and Semantic Similarity.使本体与HL7 FHIR相匹配以实现其句法和语义相似性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:51-54.
10
Data Quality in Electronic Health Records Research: Quality Domains and Assessment Methods.电子健康记录研究中的数据质量：质量领域与评估方法
West J Nurs Res. 2018 May;40(5):753-766. doi: 10.1177/0193945916689084. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
引用本文的文献
1
Data quality assessment in healthcare, dimensions, methods and tools: a systematic review.医疗保健中的数据质量评估：维度、方法与工具——一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03136-y.
2
Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.临床数据生命周期中数据质量面临的挑战：系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e60709. doi: 10.2196/60709.
3
The Venus score for the assessment of the quality and trustworthiness of biomedical datasets.用于评估生物医学数据集质量和可信度的维纳斯评分。
BioData Min. 2025 Jan 9;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13040-024-00412-x.
4
Investigation on the preferences for data quality assessment indicators of electronic health records: user-oriented perspective.电子健康记录数据质量评估指标的偏好调查：以用户为导向的视角
JAMIA Open. 2024 Dec 11;7(4):ooae142. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae142. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Navigating electronic health record accuracy by examination of sex incongruent conditions.通过检查性别不一致状况来把握电子健康记录的准确性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2849-2856. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae236.
6
The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic review.用于评估医学中可信人工智能数据质量的METRIC框架：一项系统综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Aug 3;7(1):203. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01196-4.
7
Development of a quantitative index system for evaluating the quality of electronic medical records in disease risk intelligent prediction.开发用于评估疾病风险智能预测中电子病历质量的定量指标体系。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02533-z.
8
A Standard Framework for Evaluating Large Health Care Data and Related Resources.用于评估大型医疗保健数据和相关资源的标准框架。
MMWR Suppl. 2024 May 9;73(3):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7303a1.
9
Factors impacting clinical data and documentation quality in Australian aged care and disability services: a user-centred perspective.影响澳大利亚老年护理和残疾服务临床数据和文档质量的因素：以用户为中心的视角。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04899-1.
10
Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.电子健康记录数据质量评估及工具：系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1730-1740. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad120.
本文引用的文献
1
A review of data quality assessment methods for public health information systems.公共卫生信息系统数据质量评估方法综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 14;11(5):5170-207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505170.
2
Towards an ontology for data quality in integrated chronic disease management: a realist review of the literature.迈向整合慢性病管理中数据质量的本体论：文献的现实主义回顾。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Jan;82(1):10-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
3
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.电子健康记录数据质量评估的方法和维度：为临床研究提供可重用性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
4
A pragmatic framework for single-site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record-based clinical research.基于电子健康记录的临床研究中单站点和多站点数据质量评估的实用框架。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl(0):S21-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257dd67.
5
Root causes underlying challenges to secondary use of data.数据二次使用面临挑战的根本原因。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:57-62. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
6
Quantifying clinical data quality using relative gold standards.使用相对金标准量化临床数据质量。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:356-60.
7
Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.综述：电子健康记录与质量指标的可靠性和有效性：文献回顾。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Oct;67(5):503-27. doi: 10.1177/1077558709359007. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
8
[Review of data quality dimensions and applied methods in the evaluation of health information systems].[健康信息系统评估中的数据质量维度及应用方法综述]
Cad Saude Publica. 2009 Oct;25(10):2095-109. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009001000002.
9
Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review.综述：电子病历在健康结局研究中的应用：文献综述。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Dec;66(6):611-38. doi: 10.1177/1077558709332440. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
10
Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.基于计算机的患者记录中数据的准确性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Sep-Oct;4(5):342-55. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040342.
Zotero 插件