Harveson Andrew T, Hannon James C, Brusseau Timothy A, Podlog Leslie, Papadopoulos Charilaos, Durrant Lynne H, Hall Morgan S, Kang Kyoung-Doo
a University of Utah.
b Pacific Lutheran University.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016 Jun;87(2):214-20. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1146943. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
The purpose of this study was to determine differences in cognition between acute bouts of resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, and a nonexercise control in an untrained youth sample.
Ninety-four participants performed 30 min of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, or nonexercise separated by 7 days each in a randomized crossover design. After each exercise intervention, participants were assessed using 2 cognitive tests. The Dot, Word, and Color elements of the Stroop Test (Victoria version) and Parts A and B of the Trail-Making Test were used to measure cognition.
Acute resistance and aerobic exercise resulted in similar improvements over nonexercise in all forms of the Stroop Test. Acute aerobic exercise led to improved performance over nonexercise and resistance exercise in Part B of the Trail-Making Test. Neither exercise intervention showed significant changes in time to complete Part A of the Trail-Making Test. Boys outperformed girls on the Stroop Dot and Color Test following acute aerobic exercise, in the Stroop Dot, Word, and Color Test following acute resistance exercise, and in the Stroop Color Test and Trail-Making Test Part B following nonexercise.
Both acute resistance and aerobic exercise increased measures of cognition over a nonexercise control in untrained high school youth. These findings suggest the merits of acute resistance exercise as an alternative or complement to aerobic activity for educators aiming to increase youth physical activity and cognitive function concurrently.
本研究旨在确定未经训练的青少年样本中,急性抗阻运动、有氧运动和非运动对照在认知方面的差异。
94名参与者采用随机交叉设计,分别进行30分钟的有氧运动、抗阻运动或非运动,每次之间间隔7天。每次运动干预后,使用2项认知测试对参与者进行评估。使用斯特鲁普测试(维多利亚版本)的点、单词和颜色元素以及连线测试的A部分和B部分来测量认知。
在斯特鲁普测试的所有形式中,急性抗阻运动和有氧运动相比非运动均带来了类似的改善。急性有氧运动在连线测试的B部分相比非运动和抗阻运动带来了更好的表现。两种运动干预在完成连线测试A部分的时间上均未显示出显著变化。在急性有氧运动后的斯特鲁普点和颜色测试中、急性抗阻运动后的斯特鲁普点、单词和颜色测试中以及非运动后的斯特鲁普颜色测试和连线测试B部分中,男孩的表现优于女孩。
在未经训练的高中青少年中,急性抗阻运动和有氧运动相比非运动对照均提高了认知水平。这些发现表明,对于旨在同时提高青少年身体活动和认知功能的教育工作者而言,急性抗阻运动作为有氧运动的替代或补充具有一定优势。