Paranhos Wana Yeda, Chaves Adriano Aparecido Bezerra, Frias Marcos Antonio da Eira, Leite Maria Madalena Januário
Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Dec;49 Spec No:115-21. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000800016.
Objective To analyze the performance of students of the course Supervised Curricular Internship based on skills (curriculum A) and teaching for understanding (curriculum B). Method Exploratory descriptive, quantitative and documentary study. The location of the research was a private university of the city of São Paulo and for data collection were used 312 performance assessment tools for students of the course being studied. Results The assessment of the performance of curriculum A students had no difference compared to the overall average of curriculum B students. The A students showed better performance in relation to B in the intensive care unit and in pedagogical practices, and B showed better performance in attitudinal bases topics and management. Students who are nursing technicians have better performance and, those working in the afternoon have better grades. Conclusion It was not proven that students of the course Supervised Curricular Internship of the understanding curriculum (B) had better performance than the students of the skills curriculum (A). The technical training of nursing and work shift were variables that interfered in student performance regardless of the type of curriculum. During the study there was the possibility of analyzing the performance assessment tools for students, as well as the filling by professors, noting that there is need for better structuring of the evaluation of student performance and, above all, a process of training of professors for the execution of this activity.
目的 分析基于技能的课程(课程A)和理解教学的课程(课程B)的《实习督导课程》学生的表现。方法 探索性描述性、定量和文献研究。研究地点为圣保罗市的一所私立大学,数据收集使用了312份针对所研究课程学生的表现评估工具。结果 课程A学生的表现评估与课程B学生的总体平均水平相比没有差异。A课程的学生在重症监护病房和教学实践方面相对于B课程表现更好,而B课程在态度基础主题和管理方面表现更好。护理技术员专业的学生表现更好,下午工作的学生成绩更高。结论 尚未证明理解课程(B)的《实习督导课程》学生比技能课程(A)的学生表现更好。护理技术培训和工作班次是影响学生表现的变量,与课程类型无关。在研究过程中,有可能分析学生表现评估工具以及教授的填写情况,注意到需要更好地构建学生表现评估,最重要的是,需要为教授执行此活动开展培训过程。