Willis Cameron David, Saul Jessie, Bevan Helen, Scheirer Mary Ann, Best Allan, Greenhalgh Trisha, Mannion Russell, Cornelissen Evelyn, Howland David, Jenkins Emily, Bitz Jennifer
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada and School of Population Health, The University of Adelaide, Australia.
J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):2-30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2014-0117.
The questions addressed by this review are: first, what are the guiding principles underlying efforts to stimulate sustained cultural change; second, what are the mechanisms by which these principles operate; and, finally, what are the contextual factors that influence the likelihood of these principles being effective? The paper aims to discuss these issues.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors conducted a literature review informed by rapid realist review methodology that examined how interventions interact with contexts and mechanisms to influence the sustainability of cultural change. Reference and expert panelists assisted in refining the research questions, systematically searching published and grey literature, and helping to identify interactions between interventions, mechanisms and contexts.
Six guiding principles were identified: align vision and action; make incremental changes within a comprehensive transformation strategy; foster distributed leadership; promote staff engagement; create collaborative relationships; and continuously assess and learn from change. These principles interact with contextual elements such as local power distributions, pre-existing values and beliefs and readiness to engage. Mechanisms influencing how these principles sustain cultural change include activation of a shared sense of urgency and fostering flexible levels of engagement.
The principles identified in this review, along with the contexts and mechanisms that influence their effectiveness, are useful domains for policy and practice leaders to explore when grappling with cultural change. These principles are sufficiently broad to allow local flexibilities in adoption and application.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This is the first study to adopt a realist approach for understanding how changes in organizational culture may be sustained. Through doing so, this review highlights the broad principles by which organizational action may be organized within enabling contextual settings.
本综述所探讨的问题如下:其一,推动持续性文化变革的努力背后的指导原则是什么;其二,这些原则发挥作用的机制是什么;最后,影响这些原则有效性的背景因素有哪些?本文旨在讨论这些问题。
设计/方法/途径:作者采用快速现实主义综述方法进行文献综述,研究干预措施如何与背景和机制相互作用以影响文化变革的可持续性。参考文献和专家小组协助完善研究问题、系统检索已发表文献和灰色文献,并帮助确定干预措施、机制和背景之间的相互作用。
确定了六项指导原则:使愿景与行动保持一致;在全面转型战略中进行渐进式变革;培养分布式领导力;促进员工参与;建立合作关系;持续评估并从变革中学习。这些原则与诸如地方权力分配、既有的价值观和信念以及参与意愿等背景因素相互作用。影响这些原则如何维持文化变革的机制包括激发共同的紧迫感和培养灵活的参与程度。
本综述中确定的原则,以及影响其有效性的背景和机制,是政策和实践领导者在应对文化变革时可供探索的有用领域。这些原则足够宽泛,在采用和应用时允许地方灵活性。
原创性/价值:这是第一项采用现实主义方法来理解组织文化变革如何得以维持的研究。通过这样做,本综述突出了在有利的背景环境中组织组织行动的广泛原则。