Kupeli Nuriye, Leavey Gerard, Moore Kirsten, Harrington Jane, Lord Kathryn, King Michael, Nazareth Irwin, Sampson Elizabeth L, Jones Louise
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Bamford Centre for Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK.
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Mar 10;15:31. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0103-x.
The majority of people with dementia in the UK die in care homes. The quality of end of life care in these environments is often suboptimal. The aim of the present study was to explore the context, mechanisms and outcomes for providing good palliative care to people with advanced dementia residing in UK care homes from the perspective of health and social care providers.
The design of the study was qualitative which involved purposive sampling of health care professionals to undertake interactive interviews within a realist framework. Interviews were completed between September 2012 and October 2013 and were thematically analysed and then conceptualised according to context, mechanisms and outcomes. The settings were private care homes and services provided by the National Health Service including memory clinics, mental health and commissioning services in London, United Kingdom. The participants included 14 health and social care professionals including health care assistants, care home managers, commissioners for older adults' services and nursing staff.
Good palliative care for people with advanced dementia is underpinned by the prioritisation of psychosocial and spiritual care, developing relationships with family carers, addressing physical needs including symptom management and continuous, integrated care provided by a multidisciplinary team. Contextual factors that detract from good end of life care included: an emphasis on financial efficiency over person-centred care; a complex health and social care system, societal and family attitudes towards staff; staff training and experience, governance and bureaucratisation; complexity of dementia; advance care planning and staff characteristics. Mechanisms that influence the quality of end of life care include: level of health care professionals' confidence, family uncertainty about end of life care, resources for improving end of life care and supporting families, and uncertainty about whether dementia specific palliative care is required.
Contextual factors regarding the care home environment may be obdurate and tend to negatively impact on the quality of end of life dementia care. Local level mechanisms may be more amenable to improvement. However, systemic changes to the care home environment are necessary to promote consistent, equitable and sustainable high quality end of life dementia care across the UK care home sector.
英国大多数痴呆症患者死于养老院。这些环境中的临终关怀质量往往不尽人意。本研究的目的是从卫生和社会护理提供者的角度,探讨为居住在英国养老院的晚期痴呆症患者提供优质姑息治疗的背景、机制和结果。
本研究采用定性设计,在现实主义框架内对医疗保健专业人员进行目的抽样,以进行互动访谈。访谈于2012年9月至2013年10月期间完成,进行了主题分析,然后根据背景、机制和结果进行概念化。研究地点为私立养老院以及英国国家医疗服务体系提供的服务,包括伦敦的记忆诊所、心理健康和委托服务。参与者包括14名卫生和社会护理专业人员,包括医疗保健助理、养老院经理、老年人服务专员和护理人员。
为晚期痴呆症患者提供优质姑息治疗的基础是优先考虑心理社会和精神护理、与家庭护理人员建立关系、满足身体需求,包括症状管理以及多学科团队提供的持续综合护理。不利于优质临终关怀的背景因素包括:强调财务效率而非以人为本的护理;复杂的卫生和社会护理系统、社会和家庭对工作人员的态度;工作人员培训和经验、管理和官僚化;痴呆症的复杂性;预先护理计划和工作人员特征。影响临终关怀质量的机制包括:医疗保健专业人员的信心水平、家庭对临终关怀的不确定性、改善临终关怀和支持家庭的资源,以及是否需要特定痴呆症姑息治疗的不确定性。
养老院环境的背景因素可能难以改变,并往往对痴呆症患者的临终护理质量产生负面影响。地方层面的机制可能更易于改进。然而,有必要对养老院环境进行系统性变革,以在英国养老院部门推广一致、公平和可持续的高质量痴呆症临终护理。