• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修复双固化树脂复合材料核修复材料的粘结强度。

Repair bond strength of dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials.

机构信息

Restorative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.

出版信息

J Adv Res. 2016 Mar;7(2):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jare.2015.06.003
PMID:26966567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4767805/
Abstract

The reparability of dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials using a light-cured one following one week or three months storage, prior to repair was evaluated. Two different dual-cured resin composites; Cosmecore™ DC automix and Clearfil™ DC automix core buildup materials and a light-cured nanofilled resin composite; Filtek™ Z350 XT were used. Substrate specimens were prepared (n = 12/each substrate material) and stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C either for one week or three months. Afterward, all specimens were ground flat, etched using Scotchbond™ phosphoric acid etchant and received Single Bond Universal adhesive system according to the manufacturers' instructions. The light-cured nanofilled resin composite (Filtek™ Z350 XT) was used as a repair material buildup. To determine the cohesive strength of each solid substrate material, additional specimens from each core material (n = 12) were prepared and stored for the same periods. Five sticks (0.8 ± 0.01 mm(2)) were obtained from each specimen (30 sticks/group) for microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing. Modes of failure were also determined. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect for the core materials but not for the storage periods or their interaction. After one week, dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials (Cosmecore™ DC and Clearfil™ DC) achieved significantly higher repair μTBS than the light-cured nanofilled resin composite (Filtek™ Z350 XT). However, Clearfil™ DC revealed the highest value, then Cosmecore™ DC and Filtek™ Z350 XT, following storage for 3-month. Repair strength values recovered 64-86% of the cohesive strengths of solid substrate materials. The predominant mode of failure was the mixed type. Dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials revealed acceptable repair bond strength values even after 3-month storage.

摘要

研究了在修复前一周或三个月储存后,用光固化的单组分树脂复合材料修复双固化树脂复合核修复材料的可修复性。使用了两种不同的双固化树脂复合材料:Cosmecore™ DC 自混合和 Clearfil™ DC 自混合核修复材料以及光固化纳米复合树脂复合材料:Filtek™ Z350 XT。制备基底标本(每种基底材料 n = 12/)并在 37°C 的人工唾液中储存一周或三个月。之后,所有标本均磨平,用 Scotchbond™磷酸酸蚀剂蚀刻,并根据制造商的说明使用 Single Bond Universal 胶粘剂系统。用光固化纳米复合树脂复合材料(Filtek™ Z350 XT)作为修复材料。为了确定每个固体基底材料的内聚强度,从每种核材料(n = 12)中制备并储存了额外的标本。从每个标本中获得 5 个棒(0.8 ± 0.01mm²)(每组 30 个棒)进行微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)测试。还确定了失效模式。双因素方差分析显示核材料有显著影响,但储存期或其相互作用没有显著影响。一周后,双固化树脂复合核修复材料(Cosmecore™ DC 和 Clearfil™ DC)的修复 μTBS 显著高于光固化纳米复合树脂(Filtek™ Z350 XT)。然而,Clearfil™ DC 表现出最高值,其次是 Cosmecore™ DC 和 Filtek™ Z350 XT,在储存 3 个月后。修复强度值恢复了固体基底材料内聚强度的 64-86%。主要失效模式为混合模式。即使在储存 3 个月后,双固化树脂复合核修复材料仍显示出可接受的修复粘结强度值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4149/4767805/4b1724f00d42/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4149/4767805/95181ed2cf53/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4149/4767805/b6ee80bf7e4c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4149/4767805/4b1724f00d42/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4149/4767805/95181ed2cf53/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4149/4767805/b6ee80bf7e4c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4149/4767805/4b1724f00d42/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Repair bond strength of dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials.修复双固化树脂复合材料核修复材料的粘结强度。
J Adv Res. 2016 Mar;7(2):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
2
Two-year interfacial bond durability and nanoleakage of repaired silorane-based resin composite.基于硅烷的树脂复合材料修复体的两年界面粘结耐久性和纳米渗漏研究。
Oper Dent. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):408-18. doi: 10.2341/12-061-L. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
Repair Bond Strength of Aged Silorane-based Composite Using Intermediate Adhesive Systems Based on Different Monomers.使用基于不同单体的中间粘结系统对老化的硅氧烷类复合材料进行修复粘结强度的研究
J Adhes Dent. 2015 Apr;17(2):163-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33971.
4
Universal adhesives and dual-cured core buildup composite material: adhesive properties.通用黏合剂和双重固化核堆积复合材料:黏附特性。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2020 Nov 30;28:e20200121. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0121. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of curing modes of dual-curing core systems on microtensile bond strength to dentin and formation of an acid-base resistant zone.双固化核系统固化方式对牙本质微拉伸粘结强度和酸碱抗性区形成的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2011 Dec;13(6):527-35. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a21419.
6
Mechanical properties and bond strength of dual-cure resin composites to root canal dentin.双固化树脂复合材料与根管牙本质的力学性能和粘结强度
Dent Mater. 2007 Feb;23(2):226-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
7
Effect of organic solvents compared to sandblasting on the repair bond strength of nanohybrid and nanofilled composite resins.与喷砂处理相比,有机溶剂对纳米混合复合树脂和纳米填充复合树脂修复粘结强度的影响。
Indian J Dent Res. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):433-441. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_607_15.
8
The Effects of Cavity Preparation and Composite Resin on Bond Strength and Stress Distribution Using the Microtensile Bond Test.使用微拉伸粘结试验研究窝洞预备和复合树脂对粘结强度及应力分布的影响。
Oper Dent. 2018 Jan/Feb;43(1):81-89. doi: 10.2341/16-338-L. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
9
Effects of Different Light-curing Modes on the Compressive Strengths of Nanohybrid Resin-based Composites: A Comparative Study.不同光固化模式对纳米混合树脂基复合材料抗压强度的影响:一项对比研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 Apr 15;11(2):184-189. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_423_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
10
A comparative effect of various surface chemical treatments on the resin composite-composite repair bond strength.各种表面化学处理对树脂复合材料-复合材料修复粘结强度的比较效果。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;33(3):245-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.160402.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Application of Universal Bonding on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Light Cure and Dual Cure Composites Bonded to Dentin.通用粘结剂应用于光固化和双重固化复合树脂与牙本质粘结的微拉伸粘结强度的比较评价
Front Dent. 2023 Oct 15;20:39. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i39.13879. eCollection 2023.
2
To evaluate and compare the effect of different light-curing modes and different liners on cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored with bulk filled or incrementally filled composite measured at different time intervals.评估并比较不同光固化模式和不同衬层对在不同时间间隔测量的采用大块充填或分层充填复合树脂修复的前磨牙牙尖偏斜的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):317-321. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_328_16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Repair Bond Strength of Aged Silorane-based Composite Using Intermediate Adhesive Systems Based on Different Monomers.使用基于不同单体的中间粘结系统对老化的硅氧烷类复合材料进行修复粘结强度的研究
J Adhes Dent. 2015 Apr;17(2):163-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33971.
2
Two-year interfacial bond durability and nanoleakage of repaired silorane-based resin composite.基于硅烷的树脂复合材料修复体的两年界面粘结耐久性和纳米渗漏研究。
Oper Dent. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):408-18. doi: 10.2341/12-061-L. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
Repair of restorations--criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations.
In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive.
复合材料修复粘结强度的体外评估:车针和激光表面处理及通用粘结剂应用的效果
Laser Ther. 2017 Sep 30;26(3):173-180. doi: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12.
修复体的修复——决策标准和临床建议。
Dent Mater. 2013 Jan;29(1):28-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
4
Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.修复体的耐用性:一项基于实践的研究。
J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
5
Ultrasonic measurement of the effects of adhesive application and power density on the polymerization behavior of core build-up resins.超声测量在核堆积树脂聚合行为中,黏结剂施加和功率密度的影响。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Jan;71(1):137-43. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.654252. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
Immediate vs delayed repair bond strength of a nanohybrid resin composite.纳米混合树脂复合材料即刻与延迟修复粘结强度比较。
J Adhes Dent. 2012 Jun;14(3):265-74. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a22716.
7
Microshear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin identified using the dye permeability test.使用染料渗透试验检测自酸蚀黏结剂对龋损牙本质的微拉伸黏结强度。
J Adhes Dent. 2012 Jun;14(3):245-50. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a22420.
8
Comparing the effectiveness of self-curing and light curing in polymerization of dual-cured core buildup materials.比较自凝和光固化在双重固化核堆积材料聚合中的效果。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Aug;142(8):950-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0302.
9
Effects of self-curing activator and curing protocol on the bond strength of composite core buildups.自固化激活剂和固化方案对复合核修复体粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2012 Feb;14(1):39-46. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a21541.
10
Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites?是否有一种适用于所有复合材料的最佳修复技术?
Dent Mater. 2011 Jul;27(7):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 May 14.