Suppr超能文献

复合材料修复粘结强度的体外评估:车针和激光表面处理及通用粘结剂应用的效果

In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive.

作者信息

Kiomarsi Nazanin, Espahbodi Melika, Chiniforush Nasim, Karazifard Mohammad Javd, Kamangar Sedighe Sadat Hashemi

机构信息

Department of operative dentistry, Dental school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International campus, Tehran, Iran.

Tehran University of Medical Science, International campus, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Laser Ther. 2017 Sep 30;26(3):173-180. doi: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effect of surface treatment by bur and laser and application of universal adhesive on repair bond strength of composite resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 composite blocks measuring 6×4×4 mm were fabricated of Filtek Z250 composite. All samples were subjected to 5,000 thermal cycles and divided into two groups for surface preparation by bur and by Er,Cr:YSGG laser (n = 60). The surfaces were then etched with orthophosphoric acid, rinsed with water and divided into three groups (silane, silane plus Single Bond and silane plus Single Bond Universal). Repair composite was then bonded to aged composite. Half of the samples in each group were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and the other half underwent 5000 thermal cycles. All samples were then subjected to shear bond strength testing using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Mode of failure was determined using a stereomicroscope.

RESULTS

Bur preparation plus universal adhesive yielded the highest bond strength (30.16 µ 2.26 MPa). Laser plus silane yielded the lowest bond strength (5.63 µ 2.43 MPa). Bur preparation yielded significantly higher bond strength than laser (P < 0.001). Also, application of universal adhesive significantly improved bond strength compared to conventional adhesive and silane (P < 0.001). Bond strength after aging (5000 thermal cycles) had no significant difference with primary bond strength at 24 hours within each group (P = 0.182).

CONCLUSION

Surface preparation of aged composite by bur and application of universal adhesive can improve the repair bond strength of composite. Application of silane (without adhesive) in the process of repair cannot provide adequately high repair bond strength.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估用牙钻和激光进行表面处理以及应用通用型黏结剂对复合树脂修复黏结强度的影响。

材料与方法

用Filtek Z250复合树脂制作120个尺寸为6×4×4mm的复合树脂块。所有样本均经历5000次热循环,然后分为两组,分别用牙钻和Er,Cr:YSGG激光进行表面处理(每组n = 60)。接着用正磷酸对表面进行酸蚀,用水冲洗,再分为三组(硅烷组、硅烷加Single Bond组和硅烷加Single Bond Universal组)。然后将修复用复合树脂黏结到老化的复合树脂上。每组样本的一半在37℃蒸馏水中储存24小时,另一半再经历5000次热循环。之后使用万能试验机以1mm/分钟的十字头速度对所有样本进行剪切黏结强度测试。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey's HSD检验进行分析。使用体视显微镜确定失败模式。

结果

牙钻处理加通用型黏结剂产生的黏结强度最高(30.16 µ 2.26 MPa)。激光处理加硅烷产生的黏结强度最低(5.63 µ 2.43 MPa)。牙钻处理产生的黏结强度显著高于激光处理(P < 0.001)。此外,与传统黏结剂和硅烷相比,通用型黏结剂的应用显著提高了黏结强度(P < 0.001)。每组中老化后(5000次热循环)的黏结强度与24小时时的初始黏结强度无显著差异(P = 0.182)。

结论

用牙钻对老化复合树脂进行表面处理并应用通用型黏结剂可提高复合树脂的修复黏结强度。在修复过程中单独应用硅烷(无黏结剂)无法提供足够高的修复黏结强度。

相似文献

2
Effect of thermocycling and surface treatment on repair bond strength of composite.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e945-e951. doi: 10.4317/jced.53721. eCollection 2017 Aug.
3
The comparison of the repair bond strength of the composite resin to direct and indirect composite restorations with different surface preparations.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023 Spring;17(2):101-108. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2023.35422. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

5
Surface Treatments on Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composites.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Aug 29;12(4):449-455. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_99_22. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
8
Repair bond strength of bulk fill composites after different adhesion protocols.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Nov 1;11(11):e1000-e1005. doi: 10.4317/jced.56129. eCollection 2019 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Repair bond strength of dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials.
J Adv Res. 2016 Mar;7(2):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
2
Effects of Different Surface Treatments on Composite Repairs.
J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(5):421-6. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35013.
3
Performance of universal adhesives on bonding to leucite-reinforced ceramic.
Biomater Res. 2015 May 22;19:11. doi: 10.1186/s40824-015-0035-1. eCollection 2015.
4
Influence of surface treatments to repair recent fillings of silorane-and methacrylate-based composites.
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):242-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.157265.
6
Repair bond strength in aged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites.
J Adhes Dent. 2013 Oct;15(5):447-52. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29590.
8
Repair of silorane-based dental composites: influence of surface treatments.
Dent Mater. 2012 Aug;28(8):894-902. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 May 8.
10
Silorane-based composite: depth of cure, surface hardness, degree of conversion, and cervical microleakage in Class II cavities.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Oct;23(5):324-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00411.x. Epub 2011 Apr 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验