• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青光眼性视野缺损在整个视野范围内的病程

Course of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Across the Entire Perimetric Range.

作者信息

Otarola Francisco, Chen Andrew, Morales Esteban, Yu Fei, Afifi Abdelmonem, Caprioli Joseph

机构信息

Jules Stein Eye Institute, Glaucoma Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles)2Fundacion Oftalmologica los Andes, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.

Jules Stein Eye Institute, Glaucoma Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 May 1;134(5):496-502. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0118.

DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0118
PMID:26967170
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Identifying the course of glaucomatous visual field (VF) loss that progresses from normal to perimetric blindness is important for treatment and prognostication.

OBJECTIVE

To model the process of glaucomatous VF decay over the entire perimetric range from normal to perimetric blindness.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A post hoc, retrospective analysis was performed using data from the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study and the UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Jules Stein Eye Institute Glaucoma Division. Patients with open-angle glaucoma and VFs obtained from reliable examinations (defined as <30% fixation losses, <30% false-positive rates, and <30% false-negative rates) were recruited. All tests were performed with standard automated perimetry and a 24-2 test pattern. Linear, exponential, and sigmoid regression models were used to assess the pattern of threshold sensitivity deterioration at each VF location as a function of time. Visual field locations of interest included those with a mean of the initial 2 sensitivities of 26 dB or greater and a less than 10-dB mean of the final 2 sensitivities. Root mean squared error (RMSE) was used to evaluate goodness of fit for each regression model. The error was defined as the difference between the sensitivities modeled by the function and the observed sensitivities. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study was conducted from 1998 to 2006; the present post hoc analysis was conducted from March 1, 2014, to March 1, 2015.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The RMSE of the residuals (fitted minus observed values) for the 3 regression models was used to evaluate goodness of fit.

RESULTS

A total of 798 eyes from 583 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [10.7] years; 301 [51.6%] women) who had more than 6 years of follow-up and underwent more than 10 VF examinations were included in this analysis. Mean (SD) follow-up time was 8.7 (2.2) years, and each eye had a mean of 15.2 (4.9) VF tests. For the VF locations with an initial sensitivity of 26 dB or greater and final sensitivity of less than 10 dB (309 locations), the sigmoid best-fit regression model had the lowest RMSE in 248 (80.3%) of the locations, the exponential function in 39 (12.6%), and the linear function in 22 (7.1%). The means (SDs) of RMSE were sigmoid, 4.1 (1.9); exponential, 6.0 (1.5); and linear 5.8 (1.6).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pointwise sigmoid regression had a better ability to fit perimetric decay into a subset of locations that traverse the entire range of perimetric measurements from near normal to near perimetric blindness compared with linear and exponential functions. These results support the concept that the measured behavior of glaucomatous VF loss to perimetric blindness is nonlinear and that its course of deterioration may change with the course of disease.

摘要

重要性

明确青光眼性视野(VF)从正常进展至周边视野失明的过程,对治疗和预后判断具有重要意义。

目的

构建青光眼性VF在从正常到周边视野失明的整个视野范围内衰退过程的模型。

设计、设置和参与者:利用来自高级青光眼干预研究及加州大学洛杉矶分校朱尔斯·斯坦因眼科研究所青光眼科的数据进行事后回顾性分析。招募开角型青光眼患者且其视野检查结果可靠(定义为注视丢失<30%、假阳性率<30%、假阴性率<30%)。所有检查均采用标准自动视野计及24 - 2检查模式。采用线性、指数和S形回归模型评估每个视野位置阈值敏感度随时间恶化的模式。感兴趣的视野位置包括初始2次敏感度均值为26 dB或更高且最终2次敏感度均值小于10 dB的位置。均方根误差(RMSE)用于评估每个回归模型的拟合优度。误差定义为函数模拟的敏感度与观察到的敏感度之间的差异。高级青光眼干预研究于1998年至2006年开展;本次事后分析于2014年3月1日至2015年3月1日进行。

主要结局和测量指标

3种回归模型残差(拟合值减去观察值)的RMSE用于评估拟合优度。

结果

本分析纳入了583例患者的798只眼(平均[标准差]年龄为64.7[10.7]岁;301例[51.6%]为女性),这些患者随访时间超过6年且接受了超过10次视野检查。平均(标准差)随访时间为8.7(2.2)年,每只眼平均进行了15.2(4.9)次视野检查。对于初始敏感度为26 dB或更高且最终敏感度小于10 dB的视野位置(309个位置),S形最佳拟合回归模型在248个(80.3%)位置的RMSE最低,指数函数在39个(12.6%)位置最低,线性函数在22个(7.1%)位置最低。RMSE的均值(标准差)分别为:S形,4.1(1.9);指数函数,6.0(1.5);线性函数,5.8(1.6)。

结论及相关性

与线性和指数函数相比,逐点S形回归在拟合从接近正常到接近周边视野失明的整个视野测量范围内的视野衰退子集方面具有更强的能力。这些结果支持青光眼性视野丧失至周边视野失明的测量行为是非线性的这一概念,且其恶化过程可能随疾病进程而变化。

相似文献

1
Course of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Across the Entire Perimetric Range.青光眼性视野缺损在整个视野范围内的病程
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 May 1;134(5):496-502. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0118.
2
A Method to Measure the Rate of Glaucomatous Visual Field Change.一种测量青光眼视野变化率的方法。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Nov 30;7(6):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.6.14. eCollection 2018 Nov.
3
Pointwise and Region-Wise Course of Visual Field Loss in Patients With Glaucoma.青光眼患者视野缺损的点和区域分析。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Jul 8;11(7):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.7.20.
4
Models of glaucomatous visual field loss.青光眼性视野缺损模型。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Nov 6;55(12):7881-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15435.
5
Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.评估标准自动视野计在青光眼损害区域的可靠性。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul;121(7):1359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
6
Quantification of Visual Field Variability in Glaucoma: Implications for Visual Field Prediction and Modeling.青光眼视野变异性的量化:对视野预测和建模的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 17;8(5):25. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.5.25. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Comparison of regression models for serial visual field analysis.用于系列视野分析的回归模型比较。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;58(6):504-14. doi: 10.1007/s10384-014-0341-5. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.青光眼患者长期视野波动的预测因素。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jun;127(6):739-747. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
9
Nonlinear Trend Analysis of Longitudinal Pointwise Visual Field Sensitivity in Suspected and Early Glaucoma.疑似和早期青光眼纵向逐点视野敏感度的非线性趋势分析
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 10;4(1):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.4.1.8. eCollection 2015 Feb.
10
Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR).使用逐点指数回归(PER)和逐点线性回归(PLR)增强视野预测
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 14;5(2):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.12. eCollection 2016 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Approach for Visual Field Test Forecasting.一种基于混合深度学习的视野测试预测方法。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Apr 24;5(5):100803. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100803. eCollection 2025 Sep-Oct.
2
Using Fused Data from Perimetry and Optical Coherence Tomography to Improve the Detection of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.利用视野检查和光学相干断层扫描的融合数据改善青光眼视野进展的检测
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 3;11(3):250. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030250.
3
Efficacy of Smoothing Algorithms to Enhance Detection of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.
平滑算法在增强青光眼视野进展检测中的疗效
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Nov 4;4(2):100423. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100423. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
4
A Data-Driven Model for Simulating Longitudinal Visual Field Tests in Glaucoma.基于数据驱动的青光眼纵向视野测试模拟模型。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Jun 1;12(6):27. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.6.27.
5
Effect of Testing Frequency on the Time to Detect Glaucoma Progression With Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and OCT Angiography.检测频率对使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和OCT血管造影术检测青光眼进展时间的影响。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;245:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
6
Pointwise and Region-Wise Course of Visual Field Loss in Patients With Glaucoma.青光眼患者视野缺损的点和区域分析。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Jul 8;11(7):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.7.20.
7
Hierarchical Censored Bayesian Analysis of Visual Field Progression.分层删失贝叶斯分析视野进展。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 4;10(12):4. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.4.
8
Estimating Ganglion Cell Complex Rates of Change With Bayesian Hierarchical Models.基于贝叶斯层级模型估计神经节细胞复合体的变化率。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Apr 1;10(4):15. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.4.15.
9
Improving the Feasibility of Glaucoma Clinical Trials Using Trend-Based Visual Field Progression Endpoints.基于趋势的视野进展终点提高青光眼临床试验可行性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019 Mar-Apr;2(2):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
Pointwise Methods to Measure Long-term Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.青光眼长期视野进展的逐点测量方法。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 May 1;138(5):536-543. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0647.