Asmussen Sven, Maybauer Dirk M, Chen Jiande D, Fraser John F, Toon Michael H, Przkora Rene, Jennings Kristofer, Maybauer Marc O
Departments of *Anesthesiology ‡Internal Medicine ¶Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX ∥Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL †Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany §Critical Care Research Group, The University of Queensland and the Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia #Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2017 Jul;29(3):219-227. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000290.
Acupuncture treatment has been used in China for >2500 years, and at present it is used worldwide as a form of analgesia in patients with acute and chronic pain. Furthermore, acupuncture is regularly used not only as a single anesthetic technique but also as a supplement or in addition to general anesthesia (GA).
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the level of evidence for the clinical use of acupuncture in addition to GA in patients undergoing craniotomy.
This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analyses.
The literature search (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) yielded 56 citations, published between 1972 and March 01, 2015. No systematic review or meta-analyses on this topic matched our search criteria. Each article of any language was assessed and rated for the methodological quality of the studies, using the recommendation of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Ten prospective randomized controlled clinical trials with a total of 700 patients were included.
Included in the meta-analysis were studies that involved any craniotomy under GA compared with a combination of GA and acupuncture. Exclusion criteria were no acupuncture during surgery, no GA during surgery, only postoperative data available, animal studies, and low grade of evidence.
The use of acupuncture significantly reduced the amount of volatile anesthetics during surgery (P<0.001) and led to faster extubation time (P=0.001) and postoperative patient recovery (P=0.003). In addition, significantly reduced blood levels of the brain tissue injury marker S100β 48 hours after operation (P=0.001) and occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.017) were observed. No patient studied suffered from awareness.
The analysis suggests that the complementary use of acupuncture for craniotomy has additional analgesic effects, reduces the needed amount of volatile anesthetic, reduces the onset of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and might have protective effects on brain tissue. Our findings may stimulate future randomized controlled trials to provide definitive recommendations.
针刺疗法在中国已应用超过2500年,目前在全球范围内被用作急慢性疼痛患者的一种镇痛方式。此外,针刺不仅经常作为单一的麻醉技术使用,还作为全身麻醉(GA)的补充或辅助手段。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估在接受开颅手术的患者中,针刺辅助全身麻醉临床应用的证据水平。
这是一项对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析的系统评价。
文献检索(PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和科学网)共检索到1972年至2015年3月1日期间发表的56篇文献。没有关于该主题的系统评价或荟萃分析符合我们的检索标准。使用牛津循证医学中心的推荐意见,对每篇任何语言的文章进行评估,并对研究的方法学质量进行评分。纳入了10项前瞻性随机对照临床试验,共700例患者。
荟萃分析纳入的研究为在全身麻醉下进行任何开颅手术并与全身麻醉加针刺联合应用相比较的研究。排除标准为手术期间未进行针刺、手术期间未进行全身麻醉、仅提供术后数据、动物研究以及证据等级较低。
针刺的使用显著减少了手术期间挥发性麻醉剂的用量(P<0.001),并导致拔管时间更快(P=0.001)和术后患者恢复更快(P=0.003)。此外,术后48小时观察到脑组织损伤标志物S100β的血药浓度显著降低(P=0.001)以及术后恶心呕吐的发生率降低(P=0.017)。没有研究的患者出现术中知晓。
分析表明,针刺辅助开颅手术具有额外的镇痛效果,减少了挥发性麻醉剂的用量,降低了术后恶心呕吐的发生率,并且可能对脑组织有保护作用。我们的研究结果可能会促使未来开展随机对照试验以提供明确的建议。