• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当范式在道路与铁路接口处发生碰撞时:用于认知工作分析的社会技术系统理论设计工具包评估

When paradigms collide at the road rail interface: evaluation of a sociotechnical systems theory design toolkit for cognitive work analysis.

作者信息

Read Gemma J M, Salmon Paul M, Lenné Michael G

机构信息

a Monash University Accident Research Centre , Monash University , Clayton , Australia.

b Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems , University of the Sunshine Coast , Maroochydore , Australia.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2016 Sep;59(9):1135-57. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1134816. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2015.1134816
PMID:26967660
Abstract

The Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit (CWA-DT) is a recently developed approach that provides guidance and tools to assist in applying the outputs of CWA to design processes to incorporate the values and principles of sociotechnical systems theory. In this paper, the CWA-DT is evaluated based on an application to improve safety at rail level crossings. The evaluation considered the extent to which the CWA-DT met pre-defined methodological criteria and aligned with sociotechnical values and principles. Both process and outcome measures were taken based on the ratings of workshop participants and human factors experts. Overall, workshop participants were positive about the process and indicated that it met the methodological criteria and sociotechnical values. However, expert ratings suggested that the CWA-DT achieved only limited success in producing RLX designs that fully aligned with the sociotechnical approach. Discussion about the appropriateness of the sociotechnical approach in a public safety context is provided. Practitioner Summary: Human factors and ergonomics practitioners need evidence of the effectiveness of methods. A design toolkit for cognitive work analysis, incorporating values and principles from sociotechnical systems theory, was applied to create innovative designs for rail level crossings. Evaluation results based on the application are provided and discussed.

摘要

认知工作分析设计工具包(CWA-DT)是一种最近开发的方法,它提供指导和工具,以协助将认知工作分析的成果应用于设计过程,从而融入社会技术系统理论的价值观和原则。在本文中,基于应用CWA-DT来提高铁路平交道口安全性的案例对其进行了评估。该评估考虑了CWA-DT在多大程度上符合预定义的方法标准,并与社会技术价值观和原则保持一致。过程和结果指标均基于研讨会参与者和人因专家的评分得出。总体而言,研讨会参与者对该过程持积极态度,并表示它符合方法标准和社会技术价值观。然而,专家评分表明,CWA-DT在生成完全符合社会技术方法的铁路平交道口设计方面仅取得了有限的成功。文中还提供了关于社会技术方法在公共安全背景下适用性的讨论。从业者总结:人因与工效学从业者需要方法有效性的证据。一个融合了社会技术系统理论价值观和原则的认知工作分析设计工具包,被应用于为铁路平交道口创建创新设计。文中给出并讨论了基于该应用的评估结果。

相似文献

1
When paradigms collide at the road rail interface: evaluation of a sociotechnical systems theory design toolkit for cognitive work analysis.当范式在道路与铁路接口处发生碰撞时:用于认知工作分析的社会技术系统理论设计工具包评估
Ergonomics. 2016 Sep;59(9):1135-57. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1134816. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
2
Designing a ticket to ride with the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit.使用认知工作分析设计工具包设计一张“车票”。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(8):1266-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1013576. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
3
Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice.运用认知工作分析设计社会技术系统:将理论付诸实践
Ergonomics. 2015;58(5):822-51. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.980335. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
4
Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the cognitive work analysis design toolkit (CWA-DT).以交互为中心的设计:使用认知工作分析设计工具包 (CWA-DT) 开发的道路交叉口概念的最终用户评估。
Ergonomics. 2020 Oct;63(10):1221-1239. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1782996. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
More than meets the eye: Using cognitive work analysis to identify design requirements for future rail level crossing systems.表象之下:运用认知工作分析确定未来铁路平交道口系统的设计要求。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt B:312-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Cognitive work analysis: An influential legacy extending beyond human factors and engineering.认知工作分析:一项超越人因学与工程学的有影响力的遗产。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Mar;59(Pt B):528-540. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
Walking the line: Understanding pedestrian behaviour and risk at rail level crossings with cognitive work analysis.把握关键:通过认知工作分析理解铁路平交道口的行人行为与风险
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A:209-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors.系统工效学/人因学基础。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 May 16.
9
Sounding the warning bells: the need for a systems approach to understanding behaviour at rail level crossings.敲响警钟:需要采用系统方法来理解铁路平交道口的行为。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Sep;44(5):764-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
10
Fitting methods to paradigms: are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking?使方法适配范式:人机工程学方法是否适用于系统思维?
Ergonomics. 2017 Feb;60(2):194-205. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1103385. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The adaptive capacity of public space under COVID-19: Exploring urban design interventions through a sociotechnical systems approach.新冠疫情下公共空间的适应能力:通过社会技术系统方法探索城市设计干预措施
Hum Factors Ergon Manuf. 2021 Jul;31(4):333-348. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20906. Epub 2021 May 12.