• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医患沟通中词汇使用的特征及相关因素

Characteristics and Correlates of Word Use in Physician-Patient Communication.

作者信息

Falkenstein Angelica, Tran Brandon, Ludi Daniel, Molkara Afshin, Nguyen Henry, Tabuenca Arnold, Sweeny Kate

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):664-677. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9792-x.

DOI:10.1007/s12160-016-9792-x
PMID:26968166
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have described and evaluated communication in healthcare contexts, but these studies have focused on broad content and complex units of behavior. Growing evidence reveals the predictive power and importance of precise linguistic characteristics of communication.

PURPOSE

This study aims to document characteristics, predictors, and correlates of word use within specific linguistic categories by physicians and patients during a healthcare visit.

METHODS

Conversations between patients (n = 145) and their physician (n = 6) were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry Word Count software. Patients also completed questionnaires prior to and immediately following the visit and (for a subset of patients) at a follow-up visit, which assessed patients' demographics, how much they liked the physician, and self-reported adherence. Physicians completed a questionnaire following the initial visit that assessed the patient's health status, the physician's optimism regarding the upcoming treatment, and satisfaction with the productivity of the visit.

RESULTS

Patients and physicians differed in the extent of their word use in key linguistic categories, while also maintaining significant linguistic synchrony. Demographic characteristics and health status predicted variability in patients' and physicians' word use, and word use predicted key visit outcomes. Most notably, patients liked their physician more when physicians used fewer negative emotion words and were less adherent when physicians used more singular first-person pronouns.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings reveal patterns in the way physicians speak to patients who vary in their demographic characteristics and health status and point to potentially fruitful targets for linguistic interventions with both physicians and patients.

摘要

背景

众多研究已对医疗环境中的沟通进行了描述和评估,但这些研究聚焦于宽泛的内容和复杂的行为单元。越来越多的证据揭示了沟通中精确语言特征的预测能力和重要性。

目的

本研究旨在记录医患在医疗就诊期间特定语言类别内词汇使用的特征、预测因素及相关因素。

方法

使用语言查询词频软件对患者(n = 145)与其医生(n = 6)之间的对话进行录音、转录和分析。患者在就诊前、就诊后立即以及(部分患者)随访时完成问卷,问卷评估患者的人口统计学特征、对医生的喜爱程度以及自我报告的依从性。医生在初次就诊后完成一份问卷,评估患者的健康状况、医生对即将进行的治疗的乐观程度以及对就诊效率的满意度。

结果

患者和医生在关键语言类别中的词汇使用程度存在差异,同时也保持着显著的语言同步性。人口统计学特征和健康状况预测了患者和医生词汇使用的变异性,而词汇使用预测了关键的就诊结果。最值得注意的是,当医生使用较少的负面情绪词汇时,患者对医生的喜爱程度更高;当医生使用较多的单数第一人称代词时,患者的依从性较低。

结论

这些发现揭示了医生与具有不同人口统计学特征和健康状况的患者交谈方式中的模式,并指出了对医生和患者进行语言干预的潜在有效目标。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and Correlates of Word Use in Physician-Patient Communication.医患沟通中词汇使用的特征及相关因素
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):664-677. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9792-x.
2
Liking in the physician--patient relationship.医患关系中的喜爱之情。
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Sep;48(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00071-x.
3
The relationship between physician humility, physician-patient communication, and patient health.医生的谦逊、医患沟通与患者健康之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
Effect of computer use on physician-patient communication using a validated instrument: Patient perspective.使用经过验证的工具评估计算机使用对医患沟通的影响:患者视角。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
A Comparison of Expectations of Physicians and Patients with Chronic Pain for Pain Clinic Visits.慢性疼痛患者与医生对疼痛门诊就诊期望的比较
Pain Pract. 2017 Mar;17(3):305-311. doi: 10.1111/papr.12428. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
6
Does the physician's emotional intelligence matter? Impacts of the physician's emotional intelligence on the trust, patient-physician relationship, and satisfaction.医生的情商重要吗?医生情商对信任、医患关系及满意度的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;33(4):280-8. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000318765.52148.b3.
7
Emotion language in primary care encounters: reliability and validity of an emotion word count coding system.基层医疗问诊中的情感语言:一种情感词汇计数编码系统的信度与效度
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 May;57(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.005.
8
Older patient satisfaction with communication during an initial medical encounter.老年患者对初次医疗问诊时沟通情况的满意度。
Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(9):1279-88. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90191-0.
9
Physician Racial Bias and Word Use during Racially Discordant Medical Interactions.种族不和谐医疗互动期间医生的种族偏见与用词
Health Commun. 2017 Apr;32(4):401-408. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1138389. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Patients' health as a predictor of physician and patient behavior in medical visits. A synthesis of four studies.患者健康状况作为医患诊疗行为的预测因素:四项研究的综合分析
Med Care. 1996 Dec;34(12):1205-18. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199612000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Using ChatGPT to Improve the Presentation of Plain Language Summaries of Cochrane Systematic Reviews About Oncology Interventions: Cross-Sectional Study.利用ChatGPT改善关于肿瘤学干预措施的Cochrane系统评价的简明语言总结的呈现方式:横断面研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 19;11:e63347. doi: 10.2196/63347.
2
Evaluating for Evidence of Sociodemographic Bias in Conversational AI for Mental Health Support.评估用于心理健康支持的对话式人工智能中社会人口统计学偏见的证据。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2025 Jan;28(1):44-51. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2024.0199. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
3
The Language of Compassion: Hospital Chaplains' Compassion Capacity Reduces Patient Depression via Other-Oriented, Inclusive Language.
同情的语言:医院牧师的同情能力通过以他人为导向的包容性语言减轻患者的抑郁情绪。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2023 Oct;14(10):2485-2498. doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-01907-6. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
Patient-provider communication while using a clinical decision support tool: explaining satisfaction with shared decision making for mammography screening.在使用临床决策支持工具时的医患沟通:解释对 mammography screening 共享决策的满意度。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02058-3.
5
A Multimethod Evaluation of Tobacco Treatment Trial Recruitment Messages for Current Smokers Recently Diagnosed With Cancer: Pilot Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.对近期被诊断患有癌症的当前吸烟者的烟草治疗试验招募信息的多方法评估:试点析因随机对照试验
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Aug 24;8(3):e37526. doi: 10.2196/37526.
6
What do speech pathology students gain from virtual patient interviewing? A WHO International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) analysis.言语病理学专业的学生能从虚拟患者访谈中获得什么?一项基于世界卫生组织《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的分析。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Sep 11;7(4):239-245. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000616. eCollection 2021.
7
Investigating the Relationship between Resident Physician Implicit Bias and Language Use during a Clinical Encounter with Hispanic Patients.调查住院医师隐性偏见与与西班牙语裔患者临床接触时语言使用之间的关系。
Health Commun. 2023 Jan;38(1):124-132. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1936756. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
Patient access to clinical notes in oncology: A mixed method analysis of oncologists' attitudes and linguistic characteristics towards notes.患者获取肿瘤学临床记录:对肿瘤医生对记录的态度和语言特征的混合方法分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Oct;102(10):1917-1924. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 7.
9
Languages for different health information readers: multitrait-multimethod content analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews textual summary formats.不同健康信息读者适用的语言:考科蓝系统评价文本摘要格式的多特质-多方法内容分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0716-x.
10
The influence of affective behavior on impression formation in interactions between black cancer patients and their oncologists.黑皮肤癌症患者及其肿瘤医生互动中情感行为对印象形成的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jun 21.