2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Üllői 93, Budapest, 1091, Hungary.
Molecular Oncology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016 Mar;35(1):93-107. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9613-5.
Malignant melanoma of the skin is the most aggressive human cancer given that a primary tumor a few millimeters in diameter frequently has full metastatic competence. In view of that, revealing the genetic background of this potential may also help to better understand tumor dissemination in general. Genomic analyses have established the molecular classification of melanoma based on the most frequent driver oncogenic mutations (BRAF, NRAS, KIT) and have also revealed a long list of rare events, including mutations and amplifications as well as genetic microheterogeneity. At the moment, it is unclear whether any of these rare events have role in the metastasis initiation process since the major drivers do not have such a role. During lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination, the clonal selection process is evidently reflected by differences in oncogenic drivers in the metastases versus the primary tumor. Clonal selection is also evident during lymphatic progression, though the genetic background of this immunoselection is less clear. Genomic analyses of metastases identified further genetic alterations, some of which may correspond to metastasis maintenance genes. The natural genetic progression of melanoma can be modified by targeted (BRAF or MEK inhibitor) or immunotherapies. Some of the rare events in primary tumors may result in primary resistance, while further new genetic lesions develop during the acquired resistance to both targeted and immunotherapies. Only a few genetic lesions of the primary tumor are constant during natural or therapy-modulated progression. EGFR4 and NMDAR2 mutations, MITF and MET amplifications and PTEN loss can be considered as metastasis drivers. Furthermore, BRAF and MITF amplifications as well as PTEN loss are also responsible for resistance to targeted therapies, whereas NRAS mutation is the only founder genetic lesion showing any association with sensitivity to immunotherapies. Unfortunately, there are hardly any data on the possible organ-specific metastatic drivers in melanoma. These observations suggest that clinical management of melanoma patients must rely on the genetic analysis of the metastatic lesions to be able to monitor progression-associated changes and to personalize therapies.
皮肤恶性黑色素瘤是最具侵袭性的人类癌症,因为几毫米直径的原发性肿瘤通常具有完全的转移能力。鉴于此,揭示这种潜在的遗传背景也有助于更好地了解肿瘤的一般扩散。基因组分析根据最常见的驱动致癌突变(BRAF、NRAS、KIT)建立了黑色素瘤的分子分类,还揭示了一长串罕见事件,包括突变和扩增以及遗传微异质性。目前,尚不清楚这些罕见事件中是否有任何事件在转移起始过程中起作用,因为主要驱动因素没有这样的作用。在淋巴和血液传播过程中,转移灶与原发性肿瘤中致癌驱动因素的差异明显反映了克隆选择过程。淋巴进展过程中也存在克隆选择,尽管这种免疫选择的遗传背景不太清楚。对转移灶的基因组分析确定了进一步的遗传改变,其中一些可能对应于转移维持基因。黑色素瘤的自然遗传进展可以通过靶向(BRAF 或 MEK 抑制剂)或免疫疗法来改变。原发性肿瘤中的一些罕见事件可能导致原发性耐药,而在对靶向和免疫治疗的获得性耐药过程中,会进一步产生新的遗传病变。只有少数原发性肿瘤的遗传病变在自然或治疗调节进展过程中保持不变。EGFR4 和 NMDAR2 突变、MITF 和 MET 扩增以及 PTEN 缺失可被视为转移驱动因素。此外,BRAF 和 MITF 扩增以及 PTEN 缺失也是对靶向治疗产生耐药性的原因,而 NRAS 突变是唯一与对免疫治疗的敏感性相关的创始遗传病变。不幸的是,关于黑色素瘤中可能的器官特异性转移性驱动因素几乎没有任何数据。这些观察结果表明,黑色素瘤患者的临床管理必须依赖于转移灶的遗传分析,以便能够监测进展相关的变化并进行个体化治疗。