• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度及难治性情绪障碍的研究安全性:对美国国立精神卫生研究所12年临床试验结果数据的分析

Safety of research into severe and treatment-resistant mood disorders: analysis of outcome data from 12 years of clinical trials at the US National Institute of Mental Health.

作者信息

Nugent Allison C, Iadarola Nicolas D, Miller Frank G, Luckenbaugh David A, Zarate Carlos A

机构信息

Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

The Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 May;3(5):436-42. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00006-7. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00006-7
PMID:26971192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4860062/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Placebo-controlled trials in drug-free patients have long been considered a key research component in the study of mood disorders and relevant treatment mechanisms. However, concerns have been raised about the ethics of such research, leading to an ongoing debate as to whether placebo controls are ethically acceptable. We aimed to assess the cumulative effects of research in individuals with mood disorders and to provide data to address ethical concerns regarding research in this population.

METHODS

We obtained empirical data for patients screened between between Dec 13, 2001, and Jan 31, 2014, with either major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder who were enrolled in one or more of 18 clinical trials at a US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) inpatient or outpatient behavioural health research clinic. We assessed the cumulative effects of research in our patient population, including the effects of drug taper, drug washout, and placebo administration on mood state. Two subgroups were examined: patients enrolled in trials explicitly requiring treatment resistance and patients with a current or past history of suicidal ideation or behaviour. We used the percentage change from screening as the primary outcome measure for statistical analysis of change in mood over study periods. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00024635.

FINDINGS

We obtained data for 540 patients; 360 (71%) patients were enrolled in trials requiring treatment resistance, 58 (12%) of 465 patients had suicidal ideation at screening, and 191 (60%) of 321 patients had a history of suicidal ideation. Mean mood severity at screening was in the moderate to severe range. Full participation in research, including drug tapers, drug-free periods, and placebo-controlled trials, had a low risk of symptom exacerbation. Patients undergoing drug taper had a mean increase in symptom severity of 4·2% (SD 19·56, tdegrees of freedom 96=1·85; p=0·036). We recorded modest increases in the subgroup who tapered to no medications (mean percentage change 5·1% [SD 18·10], t56=2·12; p=0·039), but increases were not significant in participants enrolled in trials requiring treatment resistance (4·3% [18·60], t72=1·96; p=0·054) and those with a current or past history of suicidal ideation or behaviour (1·8% [18·78], t51=0·68; p=0·50). Six serious adverse events were reported, including one suicide attempt that occurred during the standard treatment phase and not during the clinical trial.

INTERPRETATION

In general, research participation at the NIMH was not detrimental to health and safety, and conferred benefit in many cases. This finding was true not only in our entire research population, but also in treatment-resistant subgroups and subgroups with a history of suicidality. Our study provides evidence to guide ethical analysis of issues in psychiatric research, and to support continued scientific investigation.

FUNDING

Intramural Research Program, NIMH, National Institutes of Health.

摘要

背景

长期以来,在未服用药物的患者中进行安慰剂对照试验一直被视为情绪障碍及相关治疗机制研究的关键组成部分。然而,此类研究的伦理问题引发了人们的关注,导致关于安慰剂对照在伦理上是否可接受的争论持续不断。我们旨在评估针对情绪障碍患者的研究的累积影响,并提供数据以解决有关该人群研究的伦理问题。

方法

我们获取了2001年12月13日至2014年1月31日期间在美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)住院或门诊行为健康研究诊所参与18项临床试验中的一项或多项试验的、患有重度抑郁症或双相情感障碍的患者的经验数据。我们评估了针对我们患者群体的研究的累积影响,包括减药、药物洗脱和给予安慰剂对情绪状态的影响。研究了两个亚组:参加明确要求有治疗抵抗性的试验的患者,以及有当前或既往自杀意念或行为史的患者。我们将筛查时的百分比变化用作研究期间情绪变化统计分析的主要结局指标。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00024635。

结果

我们获取了540例患者的数据;360例(71%)患者参加了要求有治疗抵抗性的试验,465例患者中有58例(12%)在筛查时有自杀意念,321例患者中有191例(60%)有自杀意念史。筛查时的平均情绪严重程度处于中度至重度范围。全面参与研究,包括减药、无药期和安慰剂对照试验,症状加重的风险较低。减药患者的症状严重程度平均增加了4.2%(标准差19.56,自由度为96时t值 = 1.85;p = 0.036)。我们记录到减至未用药的亚组有适度增加(平均百分比变化5.1% [标准差18.10],自由度为56时t值 = 2.12;p = 0.039),但在参加要求有治疗抵抗性的试验的参与者中增加不显著(4.3% [18.60],自由度为72时t值 = 1.96;p = 0.054),在有当前或既往自杀意念或行为史的患者中也不显著(1.8% [18.78],自由度为51时t值 = 0.68;p = 0.50)。报告了6例严重不良事件,包括1例自杀未遂,该事件发生在标准治疗阶段而非临床试验期间。

解读

总体而言,在NIMH参与研究对健康和安全无害,并且在许多情况下带来益处。这一发现不仅在我们的整个研究人群中成立,在治疗抵抗性亚组和有自杀史亚组中也是如此。我们 的研究为指导精神病学研究问题的伦理分析以及支持持续的科学调查提供了证据。

资金来源

国立卫生研究院NIMH内部研究项目。

相似文献

1
Safety of research into severe and treatment-resistant mood disorders: analysis of outcome data from 12 years of clinical trials at the US National Institute of Mental Health.重度及难治性情绪障碍的研究安全性:对美国国立精神卫生研究所12年临床试验结果数据的分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 May;3(5):436-42. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00006-7. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
4
The Ethics of Clinical Trials Research in Severe Mood Disorders.重度情绪障碍临床试验研究的伦理问题
Bioethics. 2017 Jul;31(6):443-453. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12349. Epub 2017 May 15.
5
Underlying mechanisms and efficacy of a suicide-focused psychological intervention for psychosis, the Cognitive Approaches to Combatting Suicidality (CARMS): a multicentre, assessor-masked, randomised controlled trial in the UK.针对精神病患者自杀问题的心理干预措施——对抗自杀性的认知方法(CARMS)的潜在机制及疗效:英国一项多中心、评估者盲法、随机对照试验
Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;12(3):177-188. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00399-7. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的尼古丁受体部分激动剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
9
10
ECNP consensus meeting. Bipolar depression. Nice, March 2007.欧洲神经精神药理学会共识会议。双相抑郁症。英国尼斯,2007年3月。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;18(7):535-49. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurobiological research with suicidal participants: A framework for investigators.神经生物学研究中的自杀参与者:研究人员的框架。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Jan-Feb;62:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
Research on the pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention of suicide: practical and ethical issues.自杀的病理生理学、治疗和预防研究:实际和伦理问题。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2301-6.
3
Expanding Access to Cancer Clinical Trials for Patients With Mental Illness.

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrence rates in bipolar disorder: Systematic comparison of long-term prospective, naturalistic studies versus randomized controlled trials.双相情感障碍的复发率:长期前瞻性、自然主义研究与随机对照试验的系统比较。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Oct;25(10):1501-12. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
2
Three-Year long-term outcome of 458 naturalistically treated inpatients with major depressive episode: severe relapse rates and risk factors.458例接受自然疗法的重度抑郁发作住院患者的三年长期预后:严重复发率及危险因素
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Oct;264(7):567-75. doi: 10.1007/s00406-014-0495-7. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
3
扩大精神疾病患者参与癌症临床试验的机会。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 20;37(18):1524-1528. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01881. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Prognosis and improved outcomes in major depression: a review.重度抑郁症的预后和改善结果:综述。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 3;9(1):127. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0460-3.
5
Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experience Survey Items and Psychiatric Disorders.儿童期不良经历调查项目与精神障碍之间的关系。
Perm J. 2018;22:18-001. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-001.
6
Active suicidal ideation during clinical antidepressant trials.临床抗抑郁药试验期间的主动自杀意念。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Nov;257:303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
The Ethics of Clinical Trials Research in Severe Mood Disorders.重度情绪障碍临床试验研究的伦理问题
Bioethics. 2017 Jul;31(6):443-453. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12349. Epub 2017 May 15.
Longitudinal course of symptom severity and fluctuation in patients with treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression.
治疗抵抗性单相和双相抑郁患者症状严重程度和波动的纵向病程。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 May 30;207(3):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
4
Sensitivity to detect change and the correlation of clinical factors with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory in depressed inpatients.检测抑郁住院患者变化的敏感性,以及与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表和贝克抑郁量表相关的临床因素。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Jun 30;198(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.11.014. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
5
Efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants: current status of research.抗抑郁药的疗效和效果:研究现状。
Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(5):267-79. doi: 10.1159/000318293. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
6
Partial remission, residual symptoms, and relapse in depression.抑郁症的部分缓解、残留症状和复发
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008;10(4):431-7. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2008.10.4/espaykel.
7
Ethical obligations and the use of placebo controls.伦理义务与安慰剂对照的使用
Can J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;53(7):428-9. doi: 10.1177/070674370805300704.
8
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.初始严重程度与抗抑郁药疗效:对提交给美国食品药品监督管理局的数据进行的荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.
9
Suicide risk in placebo-controlled trials of treatment for acute manic episode and prevention of manic-depressive episode.急性躁狂发作治疗及双相情感障碍发作预防的安慰剂对照试验中的自杀风险。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;162(4):799-802. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.799.
10
Ethics in psychiatric research: study design issues.精神病学研究中的伦理:研究设计问题。
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;49(1):55-9. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900109.