Suppr超能文献

阅读过程中眼球运动受直接控制的证据。

Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Universität Potsdam.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1468-84. doi: 10.1037/a0031647. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

Abstract

It is well established that fixation durations during reading vary with processing difficulty, but there are different views on how oculomotor control, visual perception, shifts of attention, and lexical (and higher cognitive) processing are coordinated. Evidence for a one-to-one translation of input delay into saccadic latency would provide a much needed constraint for current theoretical proposals. Here, we tested predictions of such a direct-control perspective using the stimulus-onset delay (SOD) paradigm. Words in sentences were initially masked and, on fixation, were individually unmasked with a delay (0-, 33-, 66-, 99-ms SODs). In Experiment 1, SODs were constant for all words in a sentence; in Experiment 2, SODs were manipulated on target words, while nontargets were unmasked without delay. In accordance with predictions of direct control, nonzero SODs entailed equivalent increases in fixation durations in both experiments. Yet, a population of short fixations pointed to rapid saccades as a consequence of low-level information at nonoptimal viewing positions rather than of lexical processing. Implications of these results for theoretical accounts of oculomotor control are discussed.

摘要

阅读过程中的注视持续时间随加工难度而变化,这一点已得到充分证实,但对于眼球运动控制、视觉感知、注意力转移以及词汇(和更高认知)加工是如何协调的,存在不同的观点。如果输入延迟能直接转化为眼跳潜伏期,这将为当前的理论假设提供一个非常需要的约束。在这里,我们使用刺激起始延迟(SOD)范式来检验这种直接控制观点的预测。句子中的单词最初被掩蔽,在注视时,每个单词都会单独延迟(0、33、66、99 毫秒的 SOD)显示。在实验 1 中,句子中所有单词的 SOD 都是恒定的;在实验 2 中,目标词的 SOD 被操纵,而非目标词则没有延迟显示。根据直接控制的预测,在这两个实验中,非零 SOD 导致注视持续时间等量增加。然而,一部分短注视表明,在非最佳观看位置,由于低水平信息的存在,导致快速眼跳,而不是词汇加工的结果。这些结果对眼球运动控制理论解释的影响将进行讨论。

相似文献

1
Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1468-84. doi: 10.1037/a0031647. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
2
Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):662-77. doi: 10.1037/a0030242. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
3
Control of fixation duration in visual search and memory search: another look.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Oct;8(5):709-23. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.5.709.
4
Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1632-1645. doi: 10.1177/1747021818819990. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
5
Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?
Vision Res. 2004 May;44(10):1013-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.002.
6
Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):667-82. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.667.
8
Eye movement control in Turkish sentence reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Feb;74(2):377-397. doi: 10.1177/1747021820963310. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1948-1957. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3.
10
Eye movement control in scene viewing and reading: evidence from the stimulus onset delay paradigm.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):10-5. doi: 10.1037/a0030392. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 1: The link between theory and research question.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 12;57(1):16. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02544-8.
2
Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):429-442. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01215-4. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
3
Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1948-1957. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3.
5
The Influence of Content Meaningfulness on Eye Movements across Tasks: Evidence from Scene Viewing and Reading.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 1;7:257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00257. eCollection 2016.
6
Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye-movements during reading.
Vis cogn. 2014 Mar 1;22(3-4):390-414. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2014.892041.

本文引用的文献

1
ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):907-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0575-0.
2
Eye movement control in scene viewing and reading: evidence from the stimulus onset delay paradigm.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):10-5. doi: 10.1037/a0030392. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
3
The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.
Vis cogn. 2012 Apr;20(4-5):391-421. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012.670143. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Sep;65(2):177-206. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
5
Eye movements and display change detection during reading.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1924-38. doi: 10.1037/a0024322. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
6
Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1280-93. doi: 10.1037/a0016896.
7
Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1150-70. doi: 10.1037/a0020233.
8
CRISP: a computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing.
Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):382-405. doi: 10.1037/a0018924.
9
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验