• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从工作记忆和执行控制预测多项任务中的眼动特征。

Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, 1062 SWKT, Provo, UT, 84602-5543, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):826-839. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0798-4.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-018-0798-4
PMID:29484579
Abstract

Individual differences in working memory (WM) and executive control are stable, related to cognitive task performance, and clinically predictive. Between-participant differences in eye movements are also highly reliable (Carter & Luke, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2018; Henderson & Luke, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1390-1400, 2014). However, little is known about how higher order individual differences in cognition are related to these eye-movement characteristics. In the present study, healthy college-age participants performed several individual difference tasks to measure WM span and executive control. Participants also performed three eye-movement tasks: reading, visual search, and scene viewing. Across all tasks, higher WM scores were related to reduced skewness in fixation duration distributions. In reading, higher WM scores predicted longer saccades. In scene viewing, higher WM scores predicted longer fixations. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

个体在工作记忆(WM)和执行控制方面的差异是稳定的,与认知任务表现相关,并具有临床预测性。眼动的个体间差异也具有高度可靠性(Carter & Luke,《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》,2018 年;Henderson & Luke,《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》,40(4),1390-1400,2014 年)。然而,对于认知的更高阶个体差异如何与这些眼动特征相关,我们知之甚少。在本研究中,健康的大学生参与者进行了几项个体差异任务,以衡量 WM 跨度和执行控制能力。参与者还执行了三项眼动任务:阅读、视觉搜索和场景观看。在所有任务中,较高的 WM 分数与注视持续时间分布的偏度降低有关。在阅读中,较高的 WM 分数预示着更长的眼跳。在场景观看中,较高的 WM 分数预示着更长的注视时间。讨论了这些发现的理论和临床意义。

相似文献

1
Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.从工作记忆和执行控制预测多项任务中的眼动特征。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):826-839. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0798-4.
2
Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial.个体阅读时的眼动在不同时间和试验中高度一致。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Mar;44(3):482-492. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000471. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search.在阅读、假阅读、场景观看和场景搜索过程中,扫视眼动存在稳定的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1390-400. doi: 10.1037/a0036330. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
4
Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.工作记忆的注意引导因范式而异:一种个体差异方法。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):704-12. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0847-z.
5
Eye movement control in scene viewing and reading: evidence from the stimulus onset delay paradigm.眼动控制在场景观看和阅读中的作用:来自刺激起始时滞范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):10-5. doi: 10.1037/a0030392. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
6
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.阅读、场景感知和视觉搜索中的眼动与注意力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.
7
Scan patterns during real-world scene viewing predict individual differences in cognitive capacity.现实场景观看过程中的扫描模式可预测认知能力的个体差异。
J Vis. 2017 May 1;17(5):23. doi: 10.1167/17.5.23.
8
Eye movements during information processing tasks: individual differences and cultural effects.信息处理任务中的眼动:个体差异与文化影响。
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(21):2714-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
9
Working memory affects anticipatory behavior during implicit pattern learning.工作记忆会影响内隐模式学习中的预期行为。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01251-w. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia.失语症患者眼动的任务相关差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02430. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye Tracking in Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Oculomotor Markers and Clinical Applications.帕金森病中的眼动追踪:眼动标记物与临床应用综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 31;15(4):362. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040362.
2
Eye movements and user emotional experience: a study in interface design.眼球运动与用户情感体验:界面设计研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1455177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1455177. eCollection 2025.
3
An effective screening model for subjective cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults based on gait analysis and eye tracking.

本文引用的文献

1
Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial.个体阅读时的眼动在不同时间和试验中高度一致。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Mar;44(3):482-492. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000471. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
2
The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms.普罗沃语料库:一个具有可预测性规范的大型眼动追踪语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Apr;50(2):826-833. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0908-4.
3
Neural correlates of individual differences in fixation duration during natural reading.自然阅读过程中注视持续时间个体差异的神经关联
一种基于步态分析和眼动追踪的社区老年人主观认知衰退有效筛查模型。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Sep 25;16:1444375. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1444375. eCollection 2024.
4
Openness to experience predicts eye movement behavior during scene viewing.开放性经验预测了场景观看过程中的眼球运动行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2386-2411. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02937-z. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
5
EM-COGLOAD: An investigation into age and cognitive load detection using eye tracking and deep learning.EM-COGLOAD:一项使用眼动追踪和深度学习对年龄与认知负荷检测的调查。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Mar 27;24:264-280. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.03.014. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Individuals vary in their overt attention preference for positive images consistently across time and stimulus types.个体在不同时间和刺激类型下对正性图像的显性注意偏好存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58987-8.
7
An Application of Eye Movement Parameters Collected from Mass Market Devices for the Estimation of a Text Comprehension.从大众市场设备收集的眼动参数在文本理解评估中的应用。
J Eye Mov Res. 2023 Mar 20;16(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.16.2.1. eCollection 2023.
8
Test-retest reliability of eye tracking measures in a computerized Trail Making Test.计算机化连线测验中眼动追踪测量的重测信度。
J Vis. 2023 Aug 1;23(8):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.8.15.
9
An updating-based working memory load alters the dynamics of eye movements but not their spatial extent during free viewing of natural scenes.基于更新的工作记忆负荷会改变自然场景自由观看期间眼球运动的动力学,但不会改变其空间范围。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Feb;86(2):503-524. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02741-1. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
10
Eye Gaze Patterns during Reasoning Provide Insights Regarding Individual Differences in Underlying Cognitive Abilities.推理过程中的眼动模式揭示了潜在认知能力的个体差异。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 20;11(4):75. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040075.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 May 16:1-33. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1329322.
4
Assessment of the King-Devick® (KD) test for screening acute mTBI/concussion in warfighters.评估King-Devick®(KD)测试在筛查战士急性轻度创伤性脑损伤/脑震荡中的应用。
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Nov 15;370:305-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
5
Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R.在R语言中评估线性混合效应模型的显著性。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1494-1502. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y.
6
Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task.场景观看中的注视持续时间:模拟局部图像特征、眼动参数和任务的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):370-392. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1124-4.
7
Limits on lexical prediction during reading.阅读过程中词汇预测的局限性。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Aug;88:22-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
8
Observers' cognitive states modulate how visual inputs relate to gaze control.观察者的认知状态会调节视觉输入与注视控制之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Sep;42(9):1429-42. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000224. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
The Influence of Content Meaningfulness on Eye Movements across Tasks: Evidence from Scene Viewing and Reading.内容意义对跨任务眼动的影响:来自场景观看和阅读的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 1;7:257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00257. eCollection 2016.
10
Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.大脑中的语言结构:一项关于阅读中句法意外性的与注视相关的功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.050. Epub 2016 Feb 22.