Ypofanti Maria, Zisi Vasiliki, Zourbanos Nikolaos, Mouchtouri Barbara, Tzanne Pothiti, Theodorakis Yannis, Lyrakos Georgios
Department of Psychiatry, General Hospital Nikaia-Piraeus Agios Panteleimon, Athens, Greece; Department of Physical Education and Sport Science University of Thessaly, Athens, Greece.
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science University of Thessaly , Athens, Greece.
Health Psychol Res. 2015 Oct 19;3(2):2206. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2015.2206. eCollection 2015 Sep 30.
Goldberg's International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) big-five personality factor markers currently lack validating evidence. The structure of the 50-item IPIP was examined in two different adult samples (total N=811), in each case justifying a 5-factor solution, with only minor discrepancies. Age differences were comparable to previous findings using other inventories. One sample (N=193) also completed additionally another personality measure (the TIPI Short Form). Conscientiousness, extraversion and emotional stability/neuroticism scales of the IPIP were highly correlated with those of the TIPI (r=0.62 to 0.65, P=0.01). Agreeableness and Intellect/Openness scales correlated less strongly (r=0.54 and 0.58 respectively, P=0.01). The IPIP scales have good internal consistency (a=0.88) and relate strongly to major dimensions of personality assessed by the two questionnaires.
戈德堡的国际人格项目库(IPIP)大五人格因素标记目前缺乏验证证据。在两个不同的成人样本(总N = 811)中检验了50个项目的IPIP的结构,在每种情况下都证明了五因素解决方案的合理性,只有微小差异。年龄差异与使用其他量表的先前研究结果相当。一个样本(N = 193)还额外完成了另一项人格测量(TIPI简表)。IPIP的尽责性、外向性和情绪稳定性/神经质量表与TIPI的量表高度相关(r = 0.62至0.65,P = 0.01)。宜人性和智力/开放性量表的相关性较弱(分别为r = 0.54和0.58,P = 0.01)。IPIP量表具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.88),并且与两份问卷评估的人格主要维度密切相关。