Suppr超能文献

人格特质评估简短量表:葡萄牙十项人格量表(TIPI)的编制与验证

Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).

作者信息

Nunes Andreia, Limpo Teresa, Lima César F, Castro São Luís

机构信息

Center for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The importance of quickly assessing personality traits in many studies prompted the development of brief scales such as the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI), a measure of five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness). In the current study, we present the Portuguese version of TIPI and examine its psychometric properties, based on a sample of 333 Portuguese adults aged 18 to 65 years. The results revealed reliability coefficients similar to the original version (α = 0.39-0.72), very good 4-week test-retest reliability ( = 81, s > 0.71), expected factorial structure, high convergent validity with the Big-Five Inventory (s > 0.60), and correlations with self-esteem, affect, and aggressiveness similar to those found with standard measures of personality traits. Overall, our findings suggest that the Portuguese TIPI is a reliable and valid alternative to longer measures: it offers a promising tool for research contexts in which the available time for personality assessment is highly limited.

摘要

在许多研究中,快速评估人格特质的重要性促使了诸如十项人格量表(TIPI)等简短量表的发展,该量表用于测量五种人格特质(外向性、宜人性、尽责性、情绪稳定性和开放性)。在本研究中,我们呈现了TIPI的葡萄牙语版本,并基于333名年龄在18至65岁之间的葡萄牙成年人样本,检验了其心理测量特性。结果显示,信度系数与原始版本相似(α = 0.39 - 0.72),四周重测信度非常好( = 81,s > 0.71),具有预期的因子结构,与大五人格量表的收敛效度较高(s > 0.60),并且与自尊、情感和攻击性的相关性与人格特质标准测量结果相似。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,葡萄牙语TIPI是较长测量方法的可靠且有效的替代方案:它为那些人格评估可用时间极为有限的研究背景提供了一个有前景的工具。

相似文献

2
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 May 16;15:1247-1258. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. eCollection 2022.
3
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
4
Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:723852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. eCollection 2021.
5
The Turkish Adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):312-319. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6128. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
7
The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a scoping review of versions, translations and psychometric properties.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1202953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202953. eCollection 2023.
8
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Psychometric Properties of the International Personality Item Pool Big-Five Personality Questionnaire for the Greek population.
Health Psychol Res. 2015 Oct 19;3(2):2206. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2015.2206. eCollection 2015 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

4
Development and Validation of the Acceptance of Violence Against Women Scale (AVAWS).
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 Jun 19;38(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00351-4.
6
Unveiling the psychological traits of multi-marathoners: Insights from TIPI personality trait analysis.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 1;20(4):e0311647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311647. eCollection 2025.
9
Personality and emotional intelligence of researchers: The importance of affects.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 9;19(8):e0304905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304905. eCollection 2024.
10
Identifying high school risk factors that forecast heavy drinking onset in understudied young adults.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Aug;68:101413. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101413. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

2
Quantifying construct validity: two simple measures.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;84(3):608-18. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.608.
3
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
4
The aggression questionnaire.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Sep;63(3):452-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.452.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验