Suppr超能文献

扩大门诊姑息治疗的障碍与促进因素

Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Outpatient Palliative Care.

作者信息

Bekelman David B, Rabin Borsika A, Nowels Carolyn T, Sahay Anju, Heidenreich Paul A, Fischer Stacy M, Main Deborah S

机构信息

1 Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Health Care System , Denver, Colorado.

2 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;19(4):456-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0280. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Institute of Medicine recommends people with serious advanced illness have access to skilled palliative care. However, the predominant delivery model of nonhospice palliative care is inpatient, consultative care focused on the end of life, with a small specialist palliative care workforce.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to understand organizational factors that could influence the adoption and scale-up of outpatient palliative care in chronic advanced illness, using the example of heart failure.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional qualitative study. Participants were 17 health care providers and local, regional, and national health system leaders from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) who were considering whether and how to adopt and sustain outpatient palliative care. Individual interviews using semistructured questions assessed domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science.

RESULTS

Most providers and leaders perceived outpatient palliative care as high priority in the VHA given its patient-centeredness and potential to decrease health care use and costs associated with conditions like heart failure. They also supported a collaborative care team model of outpatient palliative care delivery where a palliative care specialist collaborates with medical nurses and social workers. They reported lack of performance measures/incentives for patient-centered care processes and outcomes as a potential barrier to implementation. Features of outpatient palliative care viewed as important for successful adoption and scale-up included coordination and communication with other providers, ease of integration into existing programs, and evidence of improving quality of care while not substantially increasing overall health care costs.

CONCLUSION

Incentives such as performance measures and collaboration with local VHA providers and leaders could improve adoption and scale-up of outpatient palliative care.

摘要

背景

美国医学研究所建议患有严重晚期疾病的人能够获得专业的姑息治疗。然而,非临终关怀姑息治疗的主要提供模式是住院治疗,以临终为重点的咨询护理,且姑息治疗专业人员数量较少。

目的

本研究旨在以心力衰竭为例,了解可能影响慢性晚期疾病门诊姑息治疗采用和推广的组织因素。

方法

这是一项横断面定性研究。参与者包括17名医疗服务提供者以及退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的地方、区域和国家卫生系统领导者,他们正在考虑是否以及如何采用和维持门诊姑息治疗。使用半结构化问题进行的个人访谈评估了实施科学综合框架的各个领域。

结果

大多数提供者和领导者认为门诊姑息治疗在VHA中具有高度优先性,因为它以患者为中心,并且有可能减少与心力衰竭等疾病相关的医疗保健使用和成本。他们还支持门诊姑息治疗的协作护理团队模式,即姑息治疗专家与医疗护士和社会工作者合作。他们报告说,缺乏以患者为中心的护理过程和结果的绩效衡量标准/激励措施是实施的一个潜在障碍。被认为对成功采用和推广门诊姑息治疗很重要的特征包括与其他提供者的协调和沟通、易于融入现有项目,以及在不大幅增加总体医疗保健成本的情况下提高护理质量的证据。

结论

绩效衡量标准以及与当地VHA提供者和领导者的合作等激励措施可以促进门诊姑息治疗的采用和推广。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验