Suppr超能文献

提供者对基于社区的成人姑息治疗实施情况的观点:一项范围综述

Provider Perspectives on Implementation of Adult Community-Based Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Dussault Nicole, Ho Dorian, Dukkipati Haripriya, Vick Judith B, Skalla Lesley A, Ma Jessica, Jones Christopher A, Kaufman Brystana G

机构信息

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Aug;82(4):301-318. doi: 10.1177/10775587241303963. Epub 2025 Jan 2.

Abstract

While community-based palliative care (CBPC) programs have been expanding, there remain important obstacles to widespread use. Since provider perspectives on CBPC remain underexplored, we conducted a scoping review to summarize provider perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation of adult CBPC in the United States. We systematically searched OVID, MEDLINE, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed qualitative research published from January 1, 2010 to January 9, 2024, then used PRISM framework synthesis to organize themes into provider, organization, and external environment levels. Thirty-four articles were included. At the provider level, barriers included misperceptions of palliative care (PC) by referring providers and poor communication, while facilitators included multidisciplinary teams and referring provider education. At the organizational level, time constraints were barriers, while leadership buy-in and co-located clinics were facilitators. At the external environment level, limited PC workforce and inadequate reimbursement were barriers. Our findings suggest that efforts aimed at scaling CBPC must address factors at the provider, organizational, and policy levels.

摘要

虽然基于社区的姑息治疗(CBPC)项目一直在扩大,但广泛应用仍存在重要障碍。由于提供者对CBPC的看法仍未得到充分探索,我们进行了一项范围审查,以总结美国提供者对成人CBPC实施的障碍和促进因素的看法。我们系统地检索了OVID、MEDLINE和CINAHL,查找2010年1月1日至2024年1月9日发表的同行评审定性研究,然后使用PRISM框架综合法将主题组织成提供者、组织和外部环境层面。纳入了34篇文章。在提供者层面,障碍包括转诊提供者对姑息治疗(PC)的误解和沟通不畅,而促进因素包括多学科团队和转诊提供者教育。在组织层面,时间限制是障碍,而领导层的支持和同地设置的诊所是促进因素。在外部环境层面,PC劳动力有限和报销不足是障碍。我们的研究结果表明,旨在扩大CBPC规模的努力必须解决提供者、组织和政策层面的因素。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
GUIDE dementia model: Opportunities for serious illness care.指南性痴呆模型:重症护理的机遇。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jun;72(6):1935-1938. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18787. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
8
Strategies to Improve Perioperative Palliative Care Integration for Seriously Ill Veterans.提高重病退伍军人围手术期姑息治疗整合的策略。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Dec;66(6):621-629.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.08.021. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
10
A Systematic Approach to Assessing and Addressing Palliative Care Needs in an Outpatient Population.系统评估和满足门诊人群的姑息治疗需求。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Sep;66(3):270-280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验