1 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California , San Francisco, California.
2 San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Geriatrics, Palliative, and Extended Care, San Francisco, California.
J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):243-249. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0231. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
Community-based palliative care (CBPC) plays an integral role in addressing the complex care needs of older adults with serious chronic illnesses, but is premised on effective communication and collaboration between primary care providers (PCPs) and the providers of specialty palliative care (SPC). Optimal strategies to achieve the goal of coordinated care are ill-defined.
The objective of this study was to understand the facilitators and barriers to optimal, coordinated interdisciplinary provision of CBPC.
This was a qualitative study using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Thirty semistructured interviews were conducted with primary and palliative care interdisciplinary team members in academic and community settings.
Major categories emerging from the data that positively or negatively influence optimal provision of coordinated care included feedback loops and interactions; clarity of roles; knowledge of palliative care, and workforce and structural constraints. Facilitators were frequent in-person, e-mail, or electronic medical record-based communication; defined role boundaries; and education of PCPs to distinguish elements of generalist palliative care (GPC) and more complex elements or situations requiring SPC. Barriers included inadequate communication that prevented a shared understanding of patients' needs and goals of care, limited time in primary care to provide GPC, and limited workforce in SPC.
Our findings suggest that processes are needed that promote communication, including structured communication strategies between PCPs and SPC providers, clarification of role boundaries, enrichment of nonspecialty providers' competence in GPC, and enhanced access to CBPC.
以社区为基础的姑息治疗(CBPC)在满足患有严重慢性疾病的老年人的复杂护理需求方面发挥着重要作用,但前提是初级保健提供者(PCP)与专业姑息治疗提供者(SPC)之间进行有效的沟通与协作。实现协调护理目标的最佳策略尚未明确。
本研究旨在了解优化、协调的跨学科提供 CBPC 的促进因素和障碍。
这是一项采用建构主义扎根理论方法的定性研究。在学术和社区环境中,对初级和姑息治疗跨学科团队成员进行了 30 次半结构式访谈。
数据中出现的主要类别,这些类别对协调护理的最佳提供产生积极或消极影响,包括反馈循环和互动;角色明确;对姑息治疗的了解,以及劳动力和结构限制。促进因素包括频繁的面对面、电子邮件或电子病历为基础的沟通;明确的角色界限;以及对 PCP 进行教育,以区分一般姑息治疗(GPC)的要素和更复杂的需要 SPC 的要素或情况。障碍包括沟通不足,无法共同了解患者的需求和护理目标,初级保健中的时间有限,无法提供 GPC,以及 SPC 的劳动力有限。
我们的研究结果表明,需要有促进沟通的流程,包括 PCP 与 SPC 提供者之间的结构化沟通策略、澄清角色界限、增强非专业提供者在 GPC 方面的能力,以及增强获得 CBPC 的机会。