Suppr超能文献

在考虑分子亚组因素后髓母细胞瘤切除范围的预后价值:一项回顾性综合临床与分子分析

Prognostic value of medulloblastoma extent of resection after accounting for molecular subgroup: a retrospective integrated clinical and molecular analysis.

作者信息

Thompson Eric M, Hielscher Thomas, Bouffet Eric, Remke Marc, Luu Betty, Gururangan Sridharan, McLendon Roger E, Bigner Darell D, Lipp Eric S, Perreault Sebastien, Cho Yoon-Jae, Grant Gerald, Kim Seung-Ki, Lee Ji Yeoun, Rao Amulya A Nageswara, Giannini Caterina, Li Kay Ka Wai, Ng Ho-Keung, Yao Yu, Kumabe Toshihiro, Tominaga Teiji, Grajkowska Wieslawa A, Perek-Polnik Marta, Low David C Y, Seow Wan Tew, Chang Kenneth T E, Mora Jaume, Pollack Ian F, Hamilton Ronald L, Leary Sarah, Moore Andrew S, Ingram Wendy J, Hallahan Andrew R, Jouvet Anne, Fèvre-Montange Michelle, Vasiljevic Alexandre, Faure-Conter Cecile, Shofuda Tomoko, Kagawa Naoki, Hashimoto Naoya, Jabado Nada, Weil Alexander G, Gayden Tenzin, Wataya Takafumi, Shalaby Tarek, Grotzer Michael, Zitterbart Karel, Sterba Jaroslav, Kren Leos, Hortobágyi Tibor, Klekner Almos, László Bognár, Pócza Tímea, Hauser Peter, Schüller Ulrich, Jung Shin, Jang Woo-Youl, French Pim J, Kros Johan M, van Veelen Marie-Lise C, Massimi Luca, Leonard Jeffrey R, Rubin Joshua B, Vibhakar Rajeev, Chambless Lola B, Cooper Michael K, Thompson Reid C, Faria Claudia C, Carvalho Alice, Nunes Sofia, Pimentel José, Fan Xing, Muraszko Karin M, López-Aguilar Enrique, Lyden David, Garzia Livia, Shih David J H, Kijima Noriyuki, Schneider Christian, Adamski Jennifer, Northcott Paul A, Kool Marcel, Jones David T W, Chan Jennifer A, Nikolic Ana, Garre Maria Luisa, Van Meir Erwin G, Osuka Satoru, Olson Jeffrey J, Jahangiri Arman, Castro Brandyn A, Gupta Nalin, Weiss William A, Moxon-Emre Iska, Mabbott Donald J, Lassaletta Alvaro, Hawkins Cynthia E, Tabori Uri, Drake James, Kulkarni Abhaya, Dirks Peter, Rutka James T, Korshunov Andrey, Pfister Stefan M, Packer Roger J, Ramaswamy Vijay, Taylor Michael D

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):484-495. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00581-1. Epub 2016 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with incomplete surgical resection of medulloblastoma are controversially regarded as having a marker of high-risk disease, which leads to patients undergoing aggressive surgical resections, so-called second-look surgeries, and intensified chemoradiotherapy. All previous studies assessing the clinical importance of extent of resection have not accounted for molecular subgroup. We analysed the prognostic value of extent of resection in a subgroup-specific manner.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who had a histological diagnosis of medulloblastoma and complete data about extent of resection and survival from centres participating in the Medulloblastoma Advanced Genomics International Consortium. We collected from resections done between April, 1997, and February, 2013, at 35 international institutions. We established medulloblastoma subgroup affiliation by gene expression profiling on frozen or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. We classified extent of resection on the basis of postoperative imaging as gross total resection (no residual tumour), near-total resection (<1·5 cm(2) tumour remaining), or sub-total resection (≥1·5 cm(2) tumour remaining). We did multivariable analyses of overall survival and progression-free survival using the variables molecular subgroup (WNT, SHH, group 4, and group 3), age (<3 vs ≥3 years old), metastatic status (metastases vs no metastases), geographical location of therapy (North America/Australia vs rest of the world), receipt of chemotherapy (yes vs no) and receipt of craniospinal irradiation (<30 Gy or >30 Gy vs no craniospinal irradiation). The primary analysis outcome was the effect of extent of resection by molecular subgroup and the effects of other clinical variables on overall and progression-free survival.

FINDINGS

We included 787 patients with medulloblastoma (86 with WNT tumours, 242 with SHH tumours, 163 with group 3 tumours, and 296 with group 4 tumours) in our multivariable Cox models of progression-free and overall survival. We found that the prognostic benefit of increased extent of resection for patients with medulloblastoma is attenuated after molecular subgroup affiliation is taken into account. We identified a progression-free survival benefit for gross total resection over sub-total resection (hazard ratio [HR] 1·45, 95% CI 1·07-1·96, p=0·16) but no overall survival benefit (HR 1·23, 0·87-1·72, p=0·24). We saw no progression-free survival or overall survival benefit for gross total resection compared with near-total resection (HR 1·05, 0·71-1·53, p=0·8158 for progression-free survival and HR 1·14, 0·75-1·72, p=0·55 for overall survival). No significant survival benefit existed for greater extent of resection for patients with WNT, SHH, or group 3 tumours (HR 1·03, 0·67-1·58, p=0·89 for sub-total resection vs gross total resection). For patients with group 4 tumours, gross total resection conferred a benefit to progression-free survival compared with sub-total resection (HR 1·97, 1·22-3·17, p=0·0056), especially for those with metastatic disease (HR 2·22, 1·00-4·93, p=0·050). However, gross total resection had no effect on overall survival compared with sub-total resection in patients with group 4 tumours (HR 1·67, 0·93-2·99, p=0·084).

INTERPRETATION

The prognostic benefit of increased extent of resection for patients with medulloblastoma is attenuated after molecular subgroup affiliation is taken into account. Although maximum safe surgical resection should remain the standard of care, surgical removal of small residual portions of medulloblastoma is not recommended when the likelihood of neurological morbidity is high because there is no definitive benefit to gross total resection compared with near-total resection.

FUNDING

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Terry Fox Research Institute, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Institutes of Health, Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation, and the Garron Family Chair in Childhood Cancer Research.

摘要

背景

髓母细胞瘤手术切除不完全的患者被争议性地视为高危疾病的标志物,这导致患者接受积极的手术切除,即所谓的二次探查手术,以及强化放化疗。既往所有评估切除范围临床重要性的研究均未考虑分子亚组。我们以亚组特异性方式分析了切除范围的预后价值。

方法

我们回顾性确定了组织学诊断为髓母细胞瘤且有切除范围和生存完整数据的患者,这些患者来自参与髓母细胞瘤高级基因组学国际联盟的中心。我们收集了1997年4月至2013年2月期间35个国际机构进行的切除术的数据。我们通过对冷冻或福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织进行基因表达谱分析来确定髓母细胞瘤亚组归属。我们根据术后影像学将切除范围分类为全切除(无残留肿瘤)、近全切除(残留肿瘤<1.5 cm²)或次全切除(残留肿瘤≥1.5 cm²)。我们使用分子亚组(WNT、SHH、4组和3组)、年龄(<3岁与≥3岁)、转移状态(有转移与无转移)、治疗地理位置(北美/澳大利亚与世界其他地区)、接受化疗情况(是与否)以及接受颅脊髓照射情况(<30 Gy或>30 Gy与未接受颅脊髓照射)等变量对总生存和无进展生存进行多变量分析。主要分析结果是分子亚组切除范围的影响以及其他临床变量对总生存和无进展生存的影响。

结果

我们将787例髓母细胞瘤患者(86例WNT肿瘤、242例SHH肿瘤、163例3组肿瘤和296例4组肿瘤)纳入无进展生存和总生存的多变量Cox模型。我们发现,在考虑分子亚组归属后,髓母细胞瘤患者切除范围增加的预后益处减弱。我们确定全切除与次全切除相比有无进展生存益处(风险比[HR]1.45,95%CI 1.07 - 1.96,p = 0.16),但无总生存益处(HR 1.23,0.87 - 1.72,p = 0.24)。与近全切除相比,我们未观察到全切除有任何无进展生存或总生存益处(无进展生存HR 1.05,0.71 - 1.53,p = 0.8158;总生存HR 1.14,0.75 - 1.72,p = 0.55)。对于WNT、SHH或3组肿瘤患者,更大切除范围无显著生存益处(次全切除与全切除相比HR 1.03,0.67 - 1.58,p = 0.89)。对于4组肿瘤患者,全切除与次全切除相比对无进展生存有益(HR 1.97,1.22 - 3.17,p = 0.0056),尤其是对于有转移疾病的患者(HR 2.22,1.00 - 4.93,p = 0.050)。然而,在4组肿瘤患者中,全切除与次全切除相比对总生存无影响(HR 1.67,0.93 - 2.99,p = 0.084)。

解读

在考虑分子亚组归属后,髓母细胞瘤患者切除范围增加的预后益处减弱。尽管最大安全手术切除仍应作为治疗标准,但当神经功能障碍风险高时,不建议手术切除髓母细胞瘤的小残留部分,因为与近全切除相比,全切除没有明确益处。

资助

加拿大癌症协会研究所、特里·福克斯研究所、加拿大卫生研究院、美国国立卫生研究院、儿科脑肿瘤基金会以及加伦家族儿童癌症研究主席职位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e18/4907853/f032f25b6284/nihms768539f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验