• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统影响研究——提高公共卫生和医疗保健系统绩效。

System impact research - increasing public health and health care system performance.

作者信息

Malmivaara Antti

机构信息

a Centre for Health and Social Economics , National Institute for Health and Welfare , Helsinki , Finland.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2016;48(4):211-5. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2016.1155228. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

DOI:10.3109/07853890.2016.1155228
PMID:26977939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4841023/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interventions directed to system features of public health and health care should increase health and welfare of patients and population.

AIMS

To build a new framework for studies aiming to assess the impact of public health or health care system, and to consider the role of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and of Benchmarking Controlled Trials (BCTs).

METHODS

The new concept is partly based on the author's previous paper on the Benchmarking Controlled Trial. The validity and generalizability considerations were based on previous methodological studies on RCTs and BCTs.

RESULTS

The new concept System Impact Research (SIR) covers all the studies which aim to assess the impact of the public health system or of the health care system on patients or on population. There are two kinds of studies in System Impact Research: Benchmarking Controlled Trials (observational) and Randomized Controlled Trials (experimental). The term impact covers in particular accessibility, quality, effectiveness, safety, efficiency, and equality.

CONCLUSIONS

System Impact Research - creating the scientific basis for policy decision making - should be given a high priority in medical, public health and health economic research, and should also be used for improving performance. Leaders at all levels of health and social care can use the evidence from System Impact Research for the benefit of patients and population. Key messages The new concept of SIR is defined as a research field aiming at assessing the impacts on patients and on populations of features of public health and health and social care systems or of interventions trying to change these features. SIR covers all features of public health and health and social care system, and actions upon these features. The term impact refers to all effects caused by the public health and health and social care system or parts of it, with particular emphasis on accessibility, quality, effectiveness, adverse effects, efficiency, and equality of services. SIR creates the scientific basis for policy decisions. Leaders at all levels of health and social care can use the evidence from SIR for the benefit of the patients and the population.

摘要

背景

针对公共卫生和医疗保健系统特征的干预措施应能增进患者和人群的健康与福祉。

目的

构建一个新框架,用于旨在评估公共卫生或医疗保健系统影响的研究,并考量随机对照试验(RCT)和基准对照试验(BCT)的作用。

方法

这一新概念部分基于作者先前关于基准对照试验的论文。有效性和可推广性考量基于先前对RCT和BCT的方法学研究。

结果

新的系统影响研究(SIR)概念涵盖所有旨在评估公共卫生系统或医疗保健系统对患者或人群影响的研究。系统影响研究中有两种研究类型:基准对照试验(观察性)和随机对照试验(实验性)。影响这一术语尤其涵盖可及性(可达性)、质量、有效性、安全性、效率和平等性。

结论

系统影响研究——为政策决策奠定科学基础——在医学、公共卫生和卫生经济学研究中应被高度重视,也应用于提升绩效。各级卫生和社会护理领域的领导者可利用系统影响研究的证据造福患者和人群。关键信息 系统影响研究的新概念被定义为一个研究领域,旨在评估公共卫生、健康和社会护理系统的特征或试图改变这些特征的干预措施对患者和人群的影响。系统影响研究涵盖公共卫生、健康和社会护理系统的所有特征以及针对这些特征的行动。影响这一术语指公共卫生、健康和社会护理系统或其部分所造成的所有影响,特别强调服务的可及性、质量、有效性、不良反应、效率和平等性。系统影响研究为政策决策奠定科学基础。各级卫生和社会护理领域的领导者可利用系统影响研究的证据造福患者和人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d15/4841023/9db9bea9580f/iann_a_1155228_f0002_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d15/4841023/376684691908/iann_a_1155228_f0001_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d15/4841023/9db9bea9580f/iann_a_1155228_f0002_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d15/4841023/376684691908/iann_a_1155228_f0001_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d15/4841023/9db9bea9580f/iann_a_1155228_f0002_b.jpg

相似文献

1
System impact research - increasing public health and health care system performance.系统影响研究——提高公共卫生和医疗保健系统绩效。
Ann Med. 2016;48(4):211-5. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2016.1155228. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
2
Clinical Impact Research - how to choose experimental or observational intervention study?临床影响研究——如何选择实验性或观察性干预研究?
Ann Med. 2016 Nov;48(7):492-495. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1186828. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
Assessing validity of observational intervention studies - the Benchmarking Controlled Trials.评估观察性干预研究的有效性——基准对照试验
Ann Med. 2016 Sep;48(6):440-443. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1186830. Epub 2016 May 29.
4
Benchmarking Controlled Trial--a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies.基准对照试验——一个涵盖所有观察性有效性研究的新概念。
Ann Med. 2015 Jun;47(4):332-40. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1027255. Epub 2015 May 12.
5
Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.欧洲与绩效指标和基准相关的卫生服务研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:38-47. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011042.
6
Pros and Cons of Randomized Controlled Trials and Benchmarking Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation: An Academic Debate within the European Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.康复随机对照试验和基准对照试验的优缺点:欧洲康复医学学院内部的学术辩论。
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Oct 10;54:jrm00319. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2511.
7
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.评估为儿童提供的医疗保健质量。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
8
How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?如何预测对新药公共卫生效益的评估?
Therapie. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(5):427-35. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2007071. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
9
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
ECHO: health care performance assessment in several European health systems.ECHO:若干欧洲卫生系统中的医疗保健绩效评估
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:3-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku219.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness and costs of intensive stroke rehabilitation and improvements in patient pathway in Finland: a retrospective benchmarking controlled trial.芬兰强化卒中康复和改善患者路径的效果和成本:一项回顾性基准对照试验。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Nov 13;56:jrm34944. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.34944.
2
Common Bias and Challenges in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Research: How to Tackle Them.物理医学与康复医学研究中的常见偏倚与挑战:如何应对
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jun 13;3:873241. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.873241. eCollection 2022.
3
Pros and Cons of Randomized Controlled Trials and Benchmarking Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation: An Academic Debate within the European Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
SHATTUCK LECTURE: The Future of Public Health.沙塔克讲座:公共卫生的未来
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1748-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1511248.
2
Benchmarking Controlled Trial--a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies.基准对照试验——一个涵盖所有观察性有效性研究的新概念。
Ann Med. 2015 Jun;47(4):332-40. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1027255. Epub 2015 May 12.
3
A comparison of the quality of hypertension management in primary care between Shanghai and Shenzhen: a cohort study of 3196 patients.上海与深圳基层医疗中高血压管理质量的比较:一项对3196例患者的队列研究
康复随机对照试验和基准对照试验的优缺点:欧洲康复医学学院内部的学术辩论。
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Oct 10;54:jrm00319. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2511.
4
7th Baltic and North Sea Conference on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Vascular Rehabilitation - the Journey from Causes to Results.第七届波罗的海与北海物理与康复医学会议:血管康复——从病因到结果的历程
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Jun 1;54:1-28. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2945.
5
Applicability of evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to clinical practice: A conceptual review.随机对照试验和系统评价的证据在临床实践中的适用性:一项概念性综述。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun 3;53(6):jrm00202. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2843.
6
"Rehabilitation Research Framework for Patients With COVID-19" Defined by Cochrane Rehabilitation and the World Health Organization Rehabilitation Programme.《由科克伦康复和世界卫生组织康复计划定义的 COVID-19 患者康复研究框架》
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jul;102(7):1424-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
Clinical Impact Research - how to choose experimental or observational intervention study?临床影响研究——如何选择实验性或观察性干预研究?
Ann Med. 2016 Nov;48(7):492-495. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1186828. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Feb;94(5):e455. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000455.
4
Association of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reform with general surgery patient outcomes and with resident examination performance.2011 年 ACGME 住院医师勤务时间改革与普通外科患者结局和住院医师考试表现的关联。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2374-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15277.
5
Effectiveness of integrated disease management for primary care chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: results of cluster randomised trial.综合疾病管理对初级保健慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的效果:集群随机试验结果。
BMJ. 2014 Sep 10;349:g5392. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5392.
6
On decreasing inequality in health care in a cost-effective way.以具有成本效益的方式减少医疗保健方面的不平等。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 20;14:79. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-79.
7
Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery.减重手术后的手术技能和并发症发生率。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1434-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1300625.
8
Reduced mortality with hospital pay for performance in England.英国的医院绩效薪酬降低了死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1821-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1114951.
9
Optimising the value of interventions for populations.优化针对人群的干预措施的价值。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 17;345:e6192. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6192.
10
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:群组随机试验扩展版》
BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661.