• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ECHO:若干欧洲卫生系统中的医疗保健绩效评估

ECHO: health care performance assessment in several European health systems.

作者信息

Bernal-Delgado E, Christiansen T, Bloor K, Mateus C, Yazbeck A M, Munck J, Bremner J

机构信息

1 Institute for Health Sciences in Aragon, IIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain 2 Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain

3 Centre of Health Economics Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:3-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku219.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/cku219
PMID:25690123
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strengthening health-care effectiveness, increasing accessibility and improving resilience are key goals in the upcoming European Union health-care agenda. European Collaboration for Health-Care Optimization (ECHO), an international research project on health-care performance assessment funded by the seventh framework programme, has provided evidence and methodology to allow the attainment of those goals. This article aims at describing ECHO, analysing its main instruments and discussing some of the ECHO policy implications.

METHODS

Using patient-level administrative data, a series of observational studies (ecological and cross-section with associated time-series analyses) were conducted to analyze population and patients' exposure to health care. Operationally, several performance dimensions such as health-care inequalities, quality, safety and efficiency were analyzed using a set of validated indicators. The main instruments in ECHO were: (i) building a homogeneous data infrastructure; (ii) constructing coding crosswalks to allow comparisons between countries; (iii) making geographical units of analysis comparable; and (iv) allowing comparisons through the use of common benchmarks.

CONCLUSION

ECHO has provided some innovations in international comparisons of health-care performance, mainly derived from the massive pooling of patient-level data and thus: (i) has expanded the usual approach based on average figures, providing insight into within and across country variation at various meaningful policy levels, (ii) the important effort made on data homogenization has increased comparability, increasing stakeholders' reliance on data and improving the acceptance of findings and (iii) has been able to provide more flexible and reliable benchmarking, allowing stakeholders to make critical use of the evidence.

摘要

背景

加强医疗保健有效性、提高可及性并增强恢复力是即将到来的欧盟医疗保健议程中的关键目标。欧洲医疗保健优化协作组织(ECHO)是一个由第七框架计划资助的关于医疗保健绩效评估的国际研究项目,它提供了实现这些目标的证据和方法。本文旨在描述ECHO,分析其主要工具并讨论ECHO的一些政策影响。

方法

利用患者层面的行政数据,开展了一系列观察性研究(生态研究以及带有相关时间序列分析的横断面研究),以分析人群和患者接受医疗保健的情况。在实际操作中,使用一组经过验证的指标对医疗保健不平等、质量、安全和效率等几个绩效维度进行了分析。ECHO的主要工具包括:(i)建立统一的数据基础设施;(ii)构建编码对照表以实现各国之间的比较;(iii)使分析的地理单位具有可比性;(iv)通过使用共同基准进行比较。

结论

ECHO在医疗保健绩效的国际比较方面提供了一些创新,主要源于对患者层面数据的大规模汇总,因此:(i)扩展了基于平均数的常规方法,在多个有意义的政策层面上深入了解了国家内部和国家之间的差异;(ii)在数据同质化方面所做的重要努力提高了可比性,增强了利益相关者对数据的依赖,并提高了对研究结果的接受度;(iii)能够提供更灵活、可靠的基准,使利益相关者能够批判性地利用这些证据。

相似文献

1
ECHO: health care performance assessment in several European health systems.ECHO:若干欧洲卫生系统中的医疗保健绩效评估
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:3-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku219.
2
Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.欧洲与绩效指标和基准相关的卫生服务研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:38-47. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011042.
3
[Methods of the EuroHOPE research program].[欧洲健康促进与预防研究计划的方法]
Orv Hetil. 2016 Oct;157(41):1619-1625. doi: 10.1556/650.2016.30559.
4
Evaluating mental health care and policy in Spain.评估西班牙的精神卫生保健与政策。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):73-86.
5
Designing a model for trauma system management using public health approach: the case of Iran.运用公共卫生方法设计创伤系统管理模型:以伊朗为例。
Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(1):9-17.
6
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?政府应该在制定健康政策方面采取哪些措施来发展上海的社区卫生保健?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.
7
Measuring integrated care.衡量整合式照护。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):B4245.
8
Inequality and polarisation in health systems' responsiveness: a cross-country analysis.卫生系统反应性的不平等和两极分化:跨国分析。
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):616-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
9
Potential of geographical variation analysis for realigning providers to value-based care. ECHO case study on lower-value indications of C-section in five European countries.地理变异分析在使医疗服务提供者重新适应基于价值的医疗方面的潜力。欧洲五个国家剖宫产低价值指征的ECHO案例研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:44-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku224.
10
Report of the EGOHID I Project. Selecting a coherent set of indicators for monitoring and evaluating oral health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the EGOHID I project.EGOHID I项目报告。为欧洲口腔健康监测与评估选择一套连贯的指标:EGOHID I项目的标准、方法与结果。
Community Dent Health. 2008 Mar;25(1):4-10.

引用本文的文献

1
User journeys in cross-European secondary use of health data: insights ahead of the European Health Data Space.欧洲跨境二次使用健康数据中的用户旅程:欧洲健康数据空间之前景洞察
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;35(Supplement_3):iii18-iii24. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf096.
2
Beyond Usual Geographical Scales of Analysis: Implications for Healthcare Management and Urban Planning.超越常规地理分析尺度:对医疗管理与城市规划的影响。
Port J Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;40(3):140-154. doi: 10.1159/000527162. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
PHIRI: lessons for an extensive reuse of sensitive data in federated health research.
菲里:在联邦健康研究中广泛重用敏感数据的教训。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i43-i49. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae036.
4
Defining Referral Regions for Inpatient Trauma Care: The Utility of a Novel Geographic Definition.定义住院创伤护理的转诊区域:一种新的地理定义的效用。
J Surg Res. 2022 Jul;275:115-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.050. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
International comparison of patient care trajectories: Insights from the ICCONIC project.患者护理轨迹的国际比较:来自ICCONIC项目的见解。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1295-1298. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13887.
6
How can we make valid and useful comparisons of different health care systems?我们如何对不同的医疗保健系统进行有效且有用的比较?
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1299-1301. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13883.
7
A methodology for identifying high-need, high-cost patient personas for international comparisons.一种用于确定具有高需求、高费用患者特征的国际比较方法。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1302-1316. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13890.
8
Differences in health care spending and utilization among older frail adults in high-income countries: ICCONIC hip fracture persona.高收入国家中体弱老年人的医疗保健支出和利用的差异:ICONIC 髋部骨折患者。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1335-1346. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13739. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
9
Differences in health outcomes for high-need high-cost patients across high-income countries.高收入国家高需求高花费患者的健康结果差异。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1347-1357. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13735. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
10
Acknowledging the role of patient heterogeneity in hospital outcome reporting: Mortality after acute myocardial infarction in five European countries.承认患者异质性在医院结局报告中的作用:五个欧洲国家的急性心肌梗死患者死亡率。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228425. eCollection 2020.