Alsafadi Ahmad Saleem, Alabdullah Mohannad M, Saltaji Humam, Abdo Anas, Youssef Mohamed
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Orthodontic Graduate Clinic, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Prog Orthod. 2016;17:9. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0122-4. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
The objective of the study is to assess the effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices on the vertical facial morphology and mandibular rotation during open bite treatment in the permanent dentition.
We performed a systematic review of the published data in seven electronic databases up to September 2015. We considered studies for inclusion if they were examining the effects of posterior teeth intrusion on the vertical facial morphology with open bite malocclusion in the permanent dentition. Study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data-extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-analysis was not possible due to dissimilarity and heterogeneity among the included studies.
Out of the 42 articles that met the initial eligibility criteria, 12 studies were finally selected. Low level of scientific evidence was identified after risk of bias assessment of the included studies with no relevant randomized controlled trial performed. Out of the 12 selected studies, five studies used miniplates and seven studies used miniscrews. Mandibular counterclockwise rotation was found to be between 2.3° and 3.9° in six studies (as sassed by mandibular plane angle, between MeGo or GoGn and SN or FH plane) while it was less than 2° in the remaining studies.
Current weak evidence suggests that molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices may cause mandibular counterclockwise autorotation. Future well-conducted and clearly reported multicenter randomized controlled trials that include a non-treatment control group are needed to make robust recommendations regarding the amount of mandibular rotation during open bite treatments.
本研究的目的是评估在恒牙列开牙合治疗中使用临时锚固装置压低磨牙对垂直面部形态和下颌旋转的影响。
我们对截至2015年9月的七个电子数据库中已发表的数据进行了系统评价。如果研究是在检查恒牙列开牙合错牙合畸形中后牙压低对垂直面部形态的影响,我们则考虑将其纳入研究。研究选择、偏倚风险评估和数据提取均重复进行。由于纳入研究之间存在差异和异质性,因此无法进行荟萃分析。
在符合初始纳入标准的42篇文章中,最终选择了12项研究。在对纳入研究进行偏倚风险评估后,发现科学证据水平较低,且未进行相关的随机对照试验。在所选的12项研究中,5项研究使用了微型钛板,7项研究使用了微螺钉。六项研究中发现下颌逆时针旋转在2.3°至3.9°之间(以下颌平面角衡量,在MeGo或GoGn与SN或FH平面之间),而其余研究中该角度小于2°。
目前的证据薄弱,提示使用临时锚固装置压低磨牙可能会导致下颌逆时针自动旋转。未来需要进行设计良好且报告清晰的多中心随机对照试验,包括非治疗对照组,以便就开牙合治疗期间下颌旋转的量提出有力的建议。