Suppr超能文献

[慢性幼年型类风湿性关节炎中IgG、IgM和IgA类类风湿因子的测量与比较]

[Measurement and comparison of the rheumatoid factors class IgG, IgM and IgA in chronic juvenile rheumatoid arthritis].

作者信息

Alvarez García J, Blanco Quirós A, Solís Sánchez P, Tellería Orriols J J, Lapeña López de Armentiá S

机构信息

Departamento de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Clínico de Valladolid.

出版信息

An Esp Pediatr. 1989 Dec;31(6):554-8.

PMID:2698069
Abstract

The rheumatoid factor (RF) was studied in 35 sera from 23 children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). The immunoglobulin class of RF was investigated and also its reactivity to both human and rabbit IgG. The RF of IgG class (IgG-RF) was more frequently positive than the IgM-RF and the IgA-RF. Nevertheless, against human IgG we found IgM-RF in the 51% of sera and IgA-RF in 48%, and against rabbit IgG in 65 and 37% respectively. All classes of RF were more frequent in rheumatoid patients than in normal controls (p less than 0.0005) although the IgA-RF increase was not significant in some groups. The specificity of the 5 RF types was always very high (92-100%). The sensibility ranged between 71% (IgG-RF against rabbit IgG) and the 37% (IgA-RF against rabbit IgG). Most sera simultaneously contained more than one class of RF. Against human IgG, the 37% had 2 classes. When we used rabbit IgG, the 31% had 3 classes and the 62% had 2 classes. The correlation of every RF class each other generally was very high (p less than 0.001). A correlation was also present in the seronegative and the systemic group, when we separately studied every clinic form. The ELISA allows detect positive IgG-RF and IgA-RF in seronegative cases by agglutination tests, therefore the seronegative concept must be reconsidered. The correlation among different RF classes are, frequently, very closed.

摘要

对23例幼年类风湿性关节炎(JRA)患儿的35份血清进行了类风湿因子(RF)研究。研究了RF的免疫球蛋白类别及其与人及兔IgG的反应性。IgG类RF(IgG-RF)比IgM-RF和IgA-RF更常呈阳性。然而,针对人IgG,我们在51%的血清中发现了IgM-RF,在48%的血清中发现了IgA-RF,针对兔IgG则分别为65%和37%。类风湿患者中所有类别的RF均比正常对照组更常见(p<0.0005),尽管在某些组中IgA-RF的增加不显著。5种RF类型的特异性始终非常高(92%-100%)。敏感性介于71%(IgG-RF针对兔IgG)和37%(IgA-RF针对兔IgG)之间。大多数血清同时含有不止一类RF。针对人IgG,37%含有2类。当使用兔IgG时,31%含有三类,62%含有两类。各RF类别之间的相关性通常非常高(p<0.001)。当我们分别研究每种临床类型时,血清阴性组和全身组也存在相关性。ELISA通过凝集试验可检测血清阴性病例中的阳性IgG-RF和IgA-RF,因此必须重新考虑血清阴性的概念。不同RF类别之间的相关性通常非常密切。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验