Hill Shannon W, Chapman Christopher R, Adeeb Samer, Duke Kajsa, Beaupre Lauren, Bouliane Martin J
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Int J Shoulder Surg. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):15-20. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.174513.
The Nice knot is a bulky double-stranded knot. Biomechanical data supporting its use as well as the number of half hitches required to ensure knot security is lacking.
Nice knots with, one, two, or three half-hitches were compared with the surgeon's and Tennessee slider knots with three half hitches. Each knot was tied 10 times around a fixed diameter using four different sutures: FiberWire (Arthrex, Naples, FL), Ultrabraid (Smith and Nephew, Andover, MA), Hi-Fi (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL) and Force Fiber (Teleflex Medical OEM, Gurnee, IL). Cyclic testing was performed for 10 min between 10N and 45N, resulting in approximately 1000 cycles. Displacement from an initial 10N load was recorded. Knots surviving cyclic testing were subjected to a load to failure test at a rate of 60 mm/min. Load at clinical failure: 3 mm slippage or opening of the suture loop was recorded. Bulk, mode of ultimate failure, opening of the loop past clinical failure, was also recorded.
During cyclic testing, the Nice knots with one or more half-hitches performed the best, slipping significantly less than the surgeon's and Tennessee Slider (P < 0.002). After one half-hitch, the addition of half-hitches did not significantly improve Nice knot performance during cyclic testing (P > 0.06). The addition of half-hitches improved the strength of the Nice knot during the force to failure test, however after two half-hitches, increase of strength was not significant (P = 0.59). While FiberWire was the most bulky of the sutures tested, it also performed the best, slipping the least.
The Nice knot, especially using FiberWire, is biomechanically superior to the surgeon's and Tennessee slider knots. Two half hitches are recommended to ensure adequate knot security.
尼斯结是一种粗大的双链结。目前缺乏支持其使用的生物力学数据以及确保结安全所需的半结数量。
将带有一个、两个或三个半结的尼斯结与带有三个半结的外科医生结和田纳西滑结进行比较。使用四种不同的缝线(FiberWire(Arthrex公司,佛罗里达州那不勒斯)、Ultrabraid(史赛克公司,马萨诸塞州安多弗)、Hi-Fi(康美医疗林肯泰克公司,佛罗里达州拉戈)和Force Fiber(泰利福医疗OEM公司,伊利诺伊州古尔尼))在固定直径上每个结系10次。在10N至45N之间进行10分钟的循环测试,产生约1000个循环。记录从初始10N负载开始的位移。通过循环测试的结以60mm/分钟的速率进行破坏载荷测试。记录临床失败时的载荷:缝线环3mm的滑动或张开。还记录了粗大程度、最终破坏模式、超过临床失败时环的张开情况。
在循环测试期间,带有一个或多个半结的尼斯结表现最佳,滑动明显少于外科医生结和田纳西滑结(P<0.002)。在一个半结之后,增加半结在循环测试期间并未显著改善尼斯结的性能(P>0.06)。在破坏载荷测试期间,增加半结提高了尼斯结的强度,然而在两个半结之后,强度增加并不显著(P = 0.59)。虽然FiberWire是测试的缝线中最粗大的,但它的表现也最佳,滑动最少。
尼斯结,尤其是使用FiberWire时,在生物力学上优于外科医生结和田纳西滑结。建议使用两个半结以确保足够的结安全性。