• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型的弹性固定方式,采用环绕捆绑技术,用于胫腓联合固定:与传统皮质螺钉固定的比较。

A new type of elastic fixation, using an encircling and binding technique, for tibiofibular syndesmosis stabilization: comparison to traditional cortical screw fixation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Apr 3;18(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03579-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-023-03579-x
PMID:37009903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10069037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (DTS) is a complex fibrous joint that contributes to the stability and weight-bearing function of the ankle. As such, repair of DTS injury is required, providing fixation strength while maintaining ankle range of motion. The aim of this study was to compare a new elastic fixation technique, using an encircling and binding technique, for DTS stabilization, compared to the traditional cortical bone screw fixation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 67 patients treated for a DTS injury at our hospital, between June 2019 and June 2021. Of them, 33 were treated with encircling and binding (EB group) and 34 using a cortical screw (CS group). The following outcomes were compared between groups: time to inferior tibiofibular fixation; length of hospital stay; time to partial weight bearing; time to complete weight bearing; complications; imaging data; and functional scores.

RESULTS

Successful stabilization was achieved in all cases, with a mean follow-up period of 15.78 ± 2.97 months. Time to fixation and time to partial and complete weight bearing were shorter for the EB than that for the CS group. The length of hospital was not different between groups. With regard to complications, a superficial infection developed in one patient in each group, with wound healing achieved after active treatment. Screw fracture occurred in two patients in the CS group. At 3 months post-surgery, the American Foot Surgery Association Ankle-Hindfoot score (AOFAS) was higher and the pain score lower for the EB than that for the CS group, but with no between-group difference at the final follow-up. On imaging, the tibiofibular clear space and tibiofibular overlap were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DTS fixation using encircling and binding yielded better clinical and functional outcomes than did cortical screw fixation at 3 months post-surgery, with no difference at the final follow-up. This novel fixation technique provides firm fixation, combined with earlier return to postoperative exercise and recovery of ankle function.

摘要

背景

下胫腓联合(DTS)是一个复杂的纤维关节,有助于维持踝关节的稳定性和承重功能。因此,需要修复 DTS 损伤,既要提供固定强度,又要保持踝关节的活动范围。本研究旨在比较一种新的弹性固定技术,即使用环绕和捆绑技术固定 DTS,与传统的皮质骨螺钉固定进行比较。

方法

这是对 2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月期间在我院接受 DTS 损伤治疗的 67 例患者进行的回顾性分析。其中 33 例采用环绕和捆绑(EB 组),34 例采用皮质骨螺钉(CS 组)。比较两组之间的以下结果:下胫腓固定时间;住院时间;部分负重时间;完全负重时间;并发症;影像学数据;和功能评分。

结果

所有病例均实现了稳定的固定,平均随访时间为 15.78±2.97 个月。EB 组的固定时间、部分和完全负重时间均短于 CS 组。两组的住院时间无差异。关于并发症,每组均有 1 例发生浅表感染,经积极治疗后伤口愈合。CS 组有 2 例患者发生螺钉骨折。术后 3 个月,EB 组的美国足外科协会踝关节-后足评分(AOFAS)较高,疼痛评分较低,但最终随访时无组间差异。影像学上,两组的胫腓骨间隙和胫腓骨重叠均无差异。

结论

与皮质骨螺钉固定相比,环绕和捆绑固定在下胫腓联合固定术后 3 个月时可获得更好的临床和功能结果,最终随访时无差异。这种新型固定技术提供了牢固的固定,同时结合了更早的术后运动和踝关节功能恢复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eaf/10069037/0dbd36e9eb64/13018_2023_3579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eaf/10069037/68cf53fbf881/13018_2023_3579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eaf/10069037/f2faabfc3df2/13018_2023_3579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eaf/10069037/0dbd36e9eb64/13018_2023_3579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eaf/10069037/68cf53fbf881/13018_2023_3579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eaf/10069037/f2faabfc3df2/13018_2023_3579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eaf/10069037/0dbd36e9eb64/13018_2023_3579_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A new type of elastic fixation, using an encircling and binding technique, for tibiofibular syndesmosis stabilization: comparison to traditional cortical screw fixation.一种新型的弹性固定方式,采用环绕捆绑技术,用于胫腓联合固定:与传统皮质螺钉固定的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Apr 3;18(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03579-x.
2
A New Method of Nice Knot Elastic Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury.新型跟腓联合损伤的 Nice 结弹性固定方法
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):785-792. doi: 10.1111/os.13635. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
3
[Comparison of short-term effectiveness of metal screws and absorbable screws in repair of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis].金属螺钉与可吸收螺钉修复下胫腓联合损伤的短期疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 15;36(8):989-994. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201101.
4
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.缝线纽扣固定与经联合钉固定治疗合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jan-Feb;61(1):143-148. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
[Endobutton and cortical screw fixation for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis separated].Endobutton与皮质骨螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合分离
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Aug 25;29(8):729-733. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.08.011.
6
[TREATMENT OF PRONATION EXTERNAL ROTATION ANKLE FRACTURE COMBINED WITH SEPARATION OF DISTAL TIBIOFIBULAR SYNDESMOSIS].[旋前外旋型踝关节骨折合并下胫腓联合分离的治疗]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1081-1084. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160220.
7
[Effectiveness comparison of flexible fixation and rigid fixation in treatment of ankle pronation-external rotation fractures with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis].[弹性固定与刚性固定治疗伴下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节旋前外旋骨折的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 15;31(7):820-824. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201702050.
8
[Clinical outcomes Tight rope versus traditional screw fixation for the treatment of injury of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fracture].[临床疗效:踝关节骨折中胫腓下联合损伤的“Tight rope”固定与传统螺钉固定对比]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 May 25;30(5):441-445. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.05.010.
9
Comparison of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.缝合钉固定与下胫腓联合螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
10
Self-made wire-rope button plate: A novel option for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis separation.自制作业钢丝绳纽扣板:治疗下胫腓联合分离的新型选择。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021 Jan-Apr;29(1):2309499020975215. doi: 10.1177/2309499020975215.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the outcomes of syndesmotic ankle fractures treated with dynamic fixation versus static fixation versus fibular nail: a meta-analysis and systematic review.动力固定、静力固定与腓骨钉治疗下胫腓联合踝关节骨折的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Ann Jt. 2024 Sep 6;9:36. doi: 10.21037/aoj-24-14. eCollection 2024.
2
Better outcomes using suture button compared to screw fixation in talofibular syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: a level I evidence-based meta-analysis.与螺钉固定相比,使用缝合扣在距腓联合损伤中的应用效果更好:一项基于 I 级证据的荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jun;144(6):2641-2653. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05354-x. Epub 2024 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of an arched, Ni-Ti shape-memory connector in repairing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis ligament injury.拱形镍钛形状记忆连接器在修复下胫腓联合韧带损伤中的应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 19;23(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05449-9.
2
Comparison of double-strand braided polyester sutures tension band (Nice knot) with cable tension band in transverse patellar fractures.双股编织聚酯缝线张力带(Nice 结)与缆绳张力带治疗横断髌骨骨折的比较。
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):3085-3090. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Clinical outcomes of doubled-suture Nice knot augmented plate fixation in the treatment of comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture.
双缝线 Nice 结增强钢板固定治疗粉碎性锁骨中段骨折的临床疗效。
BMC Surg. 2021 May 28;21(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01274-4.
4
Kinematic Analysis of Combined Suture-Button and Suture Anchor Augment Constructs for Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries.踝关节联合缝钉-纽扣和缝线锚钉增强结构的运动学分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Apr;41(4):463-472. doi: 10.1177/1071100719898181. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions.诊断和治疗胫腓联合损伤。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8S):S275-S286. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
6
Dynamic Fixation Versus Static Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injuries: A Meta-Analysis.动态固定与静态固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Feb 18;25:1314-1322. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913324.
7
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.缝线纽扣与下胫腓螺钉治疗下胫腓联合损伤的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7.
8
A 24-Month Follow-Up of a Custom-Made Suture-Button Assembly for Syndesmotic Injuries of the Ankle.定制缝线纽扣组件治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的24个月随访
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Jul-Aug;56(4):744-747. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.010.
9
Novel anatomical reconstruction of distal tibiofibular ligaments restores syndesmotic biomechanics.胫腓骨远端韧带的新型解剖重建可恢复下胫腓联合的生物力学。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jun;25(6):1866-1872. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4485-y. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
A 3-D CT Analysis of Screw and Suture-Button Fixation of the Syndesmosis.下胫腓联合螺钉与缝线纽扣固定的三维CT分析
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Feb;38(2):208-214. doi: 10.1177/1071100716673590. Epub 2016 Oct 13.