Leushuis Esther, Wetzels Alex, van der Steeg Jan Willem, Steures Pieternel, Bossuyt Patrick M M, van Trooyen Netty, Repping Sjoerd, van der Horst Frans A L, Hompes Peter G A Hompes, Mol Ben Willem J, van der Veen Fulco
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int J Fertil Steril. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(4):534-40. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4613. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Standardization of the semen analysis may improve reproducibility. We assessed variability between laboratories in semen analyses and evaluated whether a transformation using Z scores and regression statistics was able to reduce this variability.
We performed a retrospective cohort study. We calculated between-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVB) for sperm concentration and for morphology. Subsequently, we standardized the semen analysis results by calculating laboratory specific Z scores, and by using regression. We used analysis of variance for four semen parameters to assess systematic differences between laboratories before and after the transformations, both in the circulation samples and in the samples obtained in the prospective cohort study in the Netherlands between January 2002 and February 2004.
The mean CVBwas 7% for sperm concentration (range 3 to 13%) and 32% for sperm morphology (range 18 to 51%). The differences between the laboratories were statistically significant for all semen parameters (all P<0.001). Standardization using Z scores did not reduce the differences in semen analysis results between the laboratories (all P<0.001).
There exists large between-laboratory variability for sperm morphology and small, but statistically significant, between-laboratory variation for sperm concentration. Standardization using Z scores does not eliminate between-laboratory variability.
精液分析的标准化可提高可重复性。我们评估了各实验室在精液分析中的变异性,并评估了使用Z分数和回归统计进行转换是否能够降低这种变异性。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们计算了精子浓度和形态的实验室间变异系数(CVB)。随后,我们通过计算各实验室特定的Z分数并使用回归分析对精液分析结果进行标准化。我们对四个精液参数使用方差分析来评估转换前后各实验室之间在循环样本以及2002年1月至2004年2月在荷兰进行的前瞻性队列研究中获取的样本中的系统差异。
精子浓度的平均CVB为7%(范围3%至13%),精子形态的平均CVB为32%(范围18%至51%)。所有精液参数在各实验室之间的差异均具有统计学意义(所有P<0.001)。使用Z分数进行标准化并未降低各实验室之间精液分析结果的差异(所有P<0.001)。
精子形态存在较大的实验室间变异性,精子浓度存在较小但具有统计学意义的实验室间变异性。使用Z分数进行标准化并不能消除实验室间的变异性。