• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[精液参数分析中操作者间和操作者内的变异性:一项质量控制计划的结果]

[Inter-and intra-operator variability in the analysis of semen parameters: results from a quality control program].

作者信息

Daoud Salima, Chakroun-Feki Nozha, Sellami Afifa, Ammar-Keskes Leila, Rebai Tarek

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Histologie-Embryologie et Biologie de la Reproduction, Faculté de Médecine de Sfax, Université de Sfax, Tunisie.

出版信息

Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Oct 26;25:115. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.115.9158. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.11604/pamj.2016.25.115.9158
PMID:28292078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5325489/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Semen analysis is a key part of male infertility investigation. The necessity of quality management implementation in the andrology laboratory has been recognized in order to ensure the reliability of its results. The aim of this study was to evaluate intra- and inter-individual variability in the assessment of semen parameters in our laboratory through a quality control programme.

METHODS

Four participants from the laboratory with different experience levels have participated in this study. Semen samples of varying quality were assessed for sperm motility, concentration and morphology and the results were used to evaluate inter-participant variability. In addition, replicates of each semen sample were analyzed to determine intra-individual variability for semen parameters analysis.

RESULTS

The average values of inter-participant coefficients of variation for sperm motility, concentration and morphology were 12.8%, 19.8% and 48.9% respectively. The mean intra-participant coefficients of variation were, respectively, 6.9%, 12.3% and 42.7% for sperm motility, concentration and morphology. Despite some random errors of under- or overestimation, the overall results remained within the limits of acceptability for all participants. Sperm morphology assessment was particularly influenced by the participant's level of experience.

CONCLUSION

The present data emphasize the need for appropriate training of the laboratory staff and for regular participation in internal quality control programmes in order to improve the reliability of laboratory results.

摘要

引言

精液分析是男性不育症检查的关键部分。为确保结果的可靠性,男科实验室实施质量管理的必要性已得到认可。本研究的目的是通过质量控制程序评估我们实验室在精液参数评估中的个体内和个体间变异性。

方法

实验室中四名经验水平不同的参与者参与了本研究。对不同质量的精液样本进行精子活力、浓度和形态评估,并将结果用于评估参与者之间的变异性。此外,对每个精液样本进行重复分析,以确定精液参数分析中的个体内变异性。

结果

精子活力、浓度和形态的参与者间变异系数平均值分别为12.8%、19.8%和48.9%。精子活力、浓度和形态的参与者内变异系数平均值分别为6.9%、12.3%和42.7%。尽管存在一些低估或高估的随机误差,但所有参与者的总体结果仍在可接受范围内。精子形态评估尤其受参与者经验水平的影响。

结论

目前的数据强调需要对实验室工作人员进行适当培训,并定期参与内部质量控制程序,以提高实验室结果的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/702be6d26923/PAMJ-25-115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/6b34e9e2bc4d/PAMJ-25-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/99cb446f3296/PAMJ-25-115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/e636ed3423dd/PAMJ-25-115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/702be6d26923/PAMJ-25-115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/6b34e9e2bc4d/PAMJ-25-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/99cb446f3296/PAMJ-25-115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/e636ed3423dd/PAMJ-25-115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1d/5325489/702be6d26923/PAMJ-25-115-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
[Inter-and intra-operator variability in the analysis of semen parameters: results from a quality control program].[精液参数分析中操作者间和操作者内的变异性:一项质量控制计划的结果]
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Oct 26;25:115. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.115.9158. eCollection 2016.
2
[Estimate of the variability in the evaluation of semen analysis].[精液分析评估中的变异性估计]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013 Nov;81(11):639-44.
3
A multilaboratory study on the variability of bovine semen analysis.一项关于牛精液分析变异性的多实验室研究。
Theriogenology. 2016 Jan 15;85(2):254-66. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.05.027.
4
Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories.在一个有十个实验室参与的研讨会上,人类精子浓度、活力和存活率评估中的个体内及个体间变异性。
Hum Reprod. 2000 Nov;15(11):2360-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.11.2360.
5
Internal quality control of semen analysis.精液分析的内部质量控制
Fertil Steril. 1992 Jul;58(1):172-8.
6
[External quality assessment of semen analysis in Poland].[波兰精液分析的外部质量评估]
Ginekol Pol. 2012 Nov;83(11):835-40.
7
[Internal quality control of sperm concentrations in semen analysis: establishment of a method].[精液分析中精子浓度的室内质量控制:一种方法的建立]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2012 Mar;18(3):235-8.
8
Semen quality and age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3,729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count and attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city.精液质量与年龄相关的变化:在印度一个城市的一家男科实验室,对 3729 名精子计数正常的夫妇的男方进行了为期 20 年的研究。
Fertil Steril. 2010 May 1;93(7):2247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.135. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
9
Quality control during the conventional analysis of semen, an essential exercise.精液常规分析过程中的质量控制是一项必不可少的工作。
J Androl. 1989 Sep-Oct;10(5):378-85. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00124.x.
10
Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice.精液分析:其在现代生殖医学实践中的地位。
Pathology. 2003 Feb;35(1):25-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Simplified sperm testing devices: a possible tool to overcome lack of accessibility and inconsistency in male factor infertility diagnosis. An opportunity for low- and middle- income countries.简化精子检测设备:克服男性因素不孕症诊断中缺乏可及性和不一致性的可能工具。低收入和中等收入国家的一个机遇。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Mar 31;13(1):79-93. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.1.011.
2
[Abnormal semen analyses in men undergoing premarital screening and in infertile couples in Butembo-Democratic Republic of Congo].[刚果民主共和国布滕博地区婚前筛查男性及不孕夫妇的精液分析异常情况]
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Oct 13;37:155. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.155.25380. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Semen analysis standardization: is there any problem in Polish laboratories?精液分析标准化:波兰实验室存在问题吗?
Asian J Androl. 2013 Sep;15(5):616-21. doi: 10.1038/aja.2013.48. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
2
High variability in results of semen analysis in andrology laboratories in Tuscany (Italy): the experience of an external quality control (EQC) programme.意大利托斯卡纳地区男科实验室精液分析结果的高度变异性:外部质量控制(EQC)计划的经验。
Andrology. 2013 May;1(3):401-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00042.x. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
3
[The virtual slide: a new tool for the External Quality Control for the spermatozoid assessment morphology].
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2011 Mar-Apr;69(2):191-8. doi: 10.1684/abc.2011.0526.
4
Quality assurance and quality control in the laboratory andrology.实验室男科学中的质量保证和质量控制。
Asian J Androl. 2010 Jan;12(1):21-5. doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.16.
5
External quality control program for semen analysis: Spanish experience.精液分析的外部质量控制程序:西班牙的经验。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005 Dec;22(11-12):379-87. doi: 10.1007/s10815-005-7461-2.
6
Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment.英国男科实验室未遵循世界卫生组织关于精子形态评估的建议。
Hum Reprod. 2005 Dec;20(12):3441-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei230. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
7
Quality control workshops in standardization of sperm concentration and motility assessment in multicentre studies.多中心研究中精子浓度和活力评估标准化的质量控制研讨会。
Int J Androl. 2005 Jun;28(3):144-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00518.x.
8
Inter-individual variability in the morphological assessment of human sperm: effect of the level of experience and the use of standard methods.人类精子形态学评估中的个体间差异:经验水平和标准方法使用的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2003 May;18(5):1018-22. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg197.
9
Semen analysis and external quality control schemes for semen analysis need global standardization.精液分析以及精液分析的外部质量控制方案需要全球标准化。
Int J Androl. 2002 Oct;25(5):306-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2002.00370.x.
10
Lack of standardization in performance of the semen analysis among laboratories in the United States.美国各实验室之间精液分析操作缺乏标准化。
Fertil Steril. 2002 Sep;78(3):603-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03296-x.