• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大针对大麻、酒精和烟草的一个常见的以公共卫生为导向的政策框架?

A common public health-oriented policy framework for cannabis, alcohol and tobacco in Canada?

作者信息

Kirst Maritt, Kolar Kat, Chaiton Michael, Schwartz Robert, Emerson Brian, Hyshka Elaine, Jesseman Rebecca, Lucas Philippe, Solomon Robert, Thomas Gerald

机构信息

University of Toronto.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2016 Mar 16;106(8):e474-6. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5206.

DOI:10.17269/cjph.106.5206
PMID:26986906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6972410/
Abstract

Support for a public health approach to cannabis policy as an alternative to prohibition and criminalization is gaining momentum. Recent drug policy changes in the United States suggest growing political feasibility for legal regulation of cannabis in other North American jurisdictions. This commentary discusses the outcomes of an interdisciplinary policy meeting with Canadian experts and knowledge users in the area of substance use interventions. The meeting explored possibilities for applying cross-substance learning on policy interventions for alcohol, tobacco and cannabis, towards the goal of advancing a public health framework for reducing harms associated with substance use in Canada. The meeting also explored how the shift in approach to cannabis policy can provide an opportunity to explore potential changes in substance use policy more generally, especially in relation to tobacco and alcohol as legally regulated substances associated with a heavy burden of illness. Drawing from the contributions and debates arising from the policy meeting, this commentary identifies underlying principles and opportunities for learning from policy interventions across tobacco, alcohol and cannabis, as well as research gaps that need to be addressed before a public health framework can be effectively pursued across these substances.

摘要

支持将公共卫生方法作为大麻政策的替代方案以取代禁令和刑事定罪的呼声日益高涨。美国近期的毒品政策变化表明,在北美其他司法管辖区对大麻进行合法监管在政治上的可行性越来越高。本评论讨论了与加拿大物质使用干预领域的专家和知识使用者举行的跨学科政策会议的成果。该会议探讨了将跨物质学习应用于酒精、烟草和大麻政策干预的可能性,以推进加拿大减少与物质使用相关危害的公共卫生框架为目标。会议还探讨了大麻政策方法的转变如何能够提供一个契机,更广泛地探索物质使用政策的潜在变化,特别是与负担沉重疾病相关的合法监管物质烟草和酒精方面的变化。借鉴政策会议产生的意见和辩论,本评论确定了从烟草、酒精和大麻的政策干预中学习的基本原则和机会,以及在能够有效推行这些物质的公共卫生框架之前需要解决的研究差距。

相似文献

1
A common public health-oriented policy framework for cannabis, alcohol and tobacco in Canada?加拿大针对大麻、酒精和烟草的一个常见的以公共卫生为导向的政策框架?
Can J Public Health. 2016 Mar 16;106(8):e474-6. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5206.
2
A critique of cannabis legalization proposals in Canada.对加拿大大麻合法化提案的批判。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Aug;34:5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 13.
3
Legalization as more effective control? Parallels between the end of alcohol prohibition (1927) and the legalization of cannabis (2018) in Ontario, Canada.合法化是更有效的管控手段?加拿大安大略省酒精禁令的终结(1927年)与大麻合法化(2018年)的相似之处。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Nov;97:103367. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103367. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
4
Problematic substance use or problematic substance use policies?有问题的物质使用还是有问题的物质使用政策?
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Jun;40(5-6):135-142. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.5/6.01.
5
Six policy lessons relevant to cannabis legalization.与大麻合法化相关的六条政策经验教训。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):698-706. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1569669. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
6
The Canadian Cannabis Act legalizes and regulates recreational cannabis use in 2018.2018 年,加拿大《大麻法案》使休闲大麻合法化并对其进行监管。
Health Policy. 2018 Mar;122(3):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
New Zealand's 'Cannabis Legalisation and Regulation Bill': an evidence-based assessment and critique of essential regulatory components towards policy outcomes.新西兰的《大麻合法化与监管法案》:基于证据对实现政策成果的关键监管要素进行的评估与批判。
N Z Med J. 2020 Jul 31;133(1519):103-111.
8
Highs and downs: A scoping review of public opinion about cannabis, alcohol and tobacco in Canada.高低起伏:加拿大公众对大麻、酒精和烟草看法的范围综述。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Feb;41(2):396-405. doi: 10.1111/dar.13372. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
9
Sweet flowers are slow, and weeds make haste: leveraging methodology from research on tobacco, alcohol, and opioid analgesics to make rapid and policy-relevant advances in cannabis science.甜美的花儿开得慢,野草却长得快:借鉴烟草、酒精和阿片类镇痛药研究中的方法学,在大麻科学领域取得快速且与政策相关的进展。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;30(3):238-250. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1465400.
10
Early-Stage Cannabis Regulatory Policy Planning Across Canada's Four Largest Provinces: A Descriptive Overview.加拿大四大省份早期大麻监管政策规划:描述性概述。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(10):1691-1704. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1608249. Epub 2019 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Alignment in local approaches to alcohol and cannabis control policy: A case study of California cities and counties.地方层面的酒精和大麻控制政策趋同:以加利福尼亚市和郡为例的研究
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Sep;119:104114. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104114. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Marijuana Use and Perceptions of Risk and Harm: A Survey among Canadians in 2016.大麻使用与对风险和危害的认知:2016年加拿大人的一项调查。
Healthc Policy. 2017 Aug;13(1):17-27. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2017.25194.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cannabis Policy Framework by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health: A proposal for a public health approach to cannabis policy in Canada.成瘾与心理健康中心的《大麻政策框架》:加拿大一项关于大麻政策公共卫生方法的提案。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Aug;34:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
2
Comparative risk assessment of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and other illicit drugs using the margin of exposure approach.采用暴露边际法对酒精、烟草、大麻及其他非法药物进行比较风险评估。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 30;5:8126. doi: 10.1038/srep08126.
3
Crude estimates of cannabis-attributable mortality and morbidity in Canada-implications for public health focused intervention priorities.加拿大大麻所致死亡率和发病率的粗略估计——对以公共卫生为重点的干预优先事项的影响
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Mar;38(1):183-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv005. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
A vision for cannabis regulation: a public health approach based on lessons learned from the regulation of alcohol and tobacco.大麻监管愿景:基于从酒精和烟草监管中汲取的经验教训的公共卫生方法。
Open Med. 2014 Jun 10;8(2):e73-80. eCollection 2014.
5
Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: a comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay.美洲的大麻政策改革:科罗拉多、华盛顿和乌拉圭的比较分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jul;25(4):727-35. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Developing public health regulations for marijuana: lessons from alcohol and tobacco.制定大麻公共卫生法规:从酒精和烟草中吸取的教训。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):1021-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301766. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
7
Legalizing a market for cannabis for pleasure: Colorado, Washington, Uruguay and beyond.将大麻用于娱乐的市场合法化:科罗拉多州、华盛顿州、乌拉圭及其他地区。
Addiction. 2014 Mar;109(3):345-51. doi: 10.1111/add.12355. Epub 2013 Nov 3.
8
The prevalence of tobacco use co-morbidities in Canada.加拿大烟草使用共病的流行率。
Can J Public Health. 2013 Mar 6;104(3):e210-5. doi: 10.17269/cjph.104.3770.
9
Smoking, stigma and tobacco 'denormalization': Further reflections on the use of stigma as a public health tool. A commentary on Social Science & Medicine's Stigma, Prejudice, Discrimination and Health Special Issue (67: 3).吸烟、污名化与烟草“去正常化”:对将污名化作为公共卫生工具的进一步思考。对《社会科学与医学》特刊(第 67 卷第 3 期)中“污名、偏见、歧视与健康”一文的评论。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(6):795-9; discussion 800-1. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.060. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
10
Tobacco harm reduction: what do the experts think?减少烟草危害:专家们怎么看?
Tob Control. 2004 Jun;13(2):123-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006346.