• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改进医疗保险的医院比较死亡率模型。

Improving Medicare's Hospital Compare Mortality Model.

作者信息

Silber Jeffrey H, Satopää Ville A, Mukherjee Nabanita, Rockova Veronika, Wang Wei, Hill Alexander S, Even-Shoshan Orit, Rosenbaum Paul R, George Edward I

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

The Department of Pediatrics, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1229-47. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12478. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12478
PMID:26987446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4874942/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To improve the predictions provided by Medicare's Hospital Compare (HC) to facilitate better informed decisions regarding hospital choice by the public.

DATA SOURCES/SETTING: Medicare claims on all patients admitted for Acute Myocardial Infarction between 2009 through 2011.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort analysis using a Bayesian approach, comparing the present assumptions of HC (using a constant mean and constant variance for all hospital random effects), versus an expanded model that allows for the inclusion of hospital characteristics to permit the data to determine whether they vary with attributes of hospitals, such as volume, capabilities, and staffing. Hospital predictions are then created using directly standardized estimates to facilitate comparisons between hospitals.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service claims.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Our model that included hospital characteristics produces very different predictions from the current HC model, with higher predicted mortality rates at hospitals with lower volume and worse characteristics. Using Chicago as an example, the expanded model would advise patients against seeking treatment at the smallest hospitals with worse technology and staffing.

CONCLUSION

To aid patients when selecting between hospitals, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should improve the HC model by permitting its predictions to vary systematically with hospital attributes such as volume, capabilities, and staffing.

摘要

目的

改进医疗保险机构的医院比较(HC)所提供的预测,以便公众在选择医院时能做出更明智的决策。

数据来源/背景:2009年至2011年期间所有因急性心肌梗死入院患者的医疗保险理赔数据。

研究设计

采用贝叶斯方法进行队列分析,比较HC目前的假设(对所有医院随机效应使用恒定均值和恒定方差)与一个扩展模型,该扩展模型允许纳入医院特征,以便数据能够确定这些特征是否因医院的属性(如规模、能力和人员配备)而有所不同。然后使用直接标准化估计值生成医院预测结果,以方便医院之间的比较。

数据收集/提取方法:医疗保险按服务收费理赔数据。

主要发现

我们纳入医院特征的模型所产生的预测结果与当前的HC模型有很大不同,规模较小且特征较差的医院预测死亡率较高。以芝加哥为例,扩展模型会建议患者不要在技术和人员配备较差的最小型医院寻求治疗。

结论

为了在患者选择医院时提供帮助,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)应改进HC模型,使其预测结果能根据医院的规模、能力和人员配备等属性系统地变化。

相似文献

1
Improving Medicare's Hospital Compare Mortality Model.改进医疗保险的医院比较死亡率模型。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1229-47. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12478. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
2
The Hospital Compare mortality model and the volume-outcome relationship.医院比较死亡率模型与量效关系。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 1):1148-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01130.x.
3
Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates.医疗保险医院比较绩效指标与死亡率之间的关系。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2694-702. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2694.
4
Nurse staffing and mortality for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction.医疗保险急性心肌梗死患者的护士配备与死亡率
Med Care. 2004 Jan;42(1):4-12. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000102369.67404.b0.
5
An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.一种适用于根据急性心肌梗死患者30天死亡率剖析医院绩效的行政索赔模型。
Circulation. 2006 Apr 4;113(13):1683-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.611186. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
6
Transfer rates from nonprocedure hospitals after initial admission and outcomes among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.非手术医院老年急性心肌梗死患者初始住院后的转归及其预后
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):213-22. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11944.
7
Medicare's public reporting initiative on hospital quality had modest or no impact on mortality from three key conditions.医疗保险的医院质量公共报告倡议对三种关键疾病的死亡率没有产生适度或没有影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):585-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0719.
8
Mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries admitted to critical access and non-critical access hospitals, 2002-2010.2002-2010 年,医疗保险受益人与入住关键通道和非关键通道医院的死亡率。
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1379-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2366.
9
Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality.急性心肌梗死的医院质量:过程指标之间的相关性以及与短期死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2006 Jul 5;296(1):72-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.1.72.
10
HMO penetration, competition, and risk-adjusted hospital mortality.健康维护组织(HMO)的渗透率、竞争情况以及风险调整后的医院死亡率。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 1):1019-35.

引用本文的文献

1
High-Dimensional Fixed Effects Profiling Models and Applications in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: Current State and Future Directions.高维固定效应剖析模型及其在终末期肾病患者中的应用:现状与未来方向
Int J Stat Med Res. 2023 Feb 15;12:193-212. doi: 10.6000/1929-6029.2023.12.24.
2
Payer-Negotiated Price Variation and Relationship to Surgical Outcomes for the Most Common Cancers at NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.支付方协商价格变化与 NCI 指定癌症中心最常见癌症手术结果的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4339-4348. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15150-x. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Evaluating Risk-Adjusted Hospital Performance Using Large-Scale Data on Mortality Rates of Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Flexible Semi-Nonparametric Modeling Approach.利用 ICU 患者死亡率的大规模数据评估风险调整后的医院绩效:一种灵活的半非参数建模方法。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023 Mar 14;11:232-246. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3257179. eCollection 2023.
4
Is there an association between hospital staffing levels and inpatient-COVID-19 mortality rates?医院人员配备水平与 COVID-19 住院患者死亡率之间是否存在关联?
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 19;17(10):e0275500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275500. eCollection 2022.
5
The first 20 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: Mortality, intubation and ICU rates among 104,590 patients hospitalized at 21 United States health systems.COVID-19 大流行的头 20 个月:21 个美国医疗系统中 104590 名住院患者的死亡率、插管率和 ICU 入住率。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0274571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274571. eCollection 2022.
6
Improving target price calculations in Medicare bundled payment programs.改进医疗保险捆绑支付计划中的目标价格计算。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):635-642. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13675. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Performance Characteristics of Profiling Methods and the Impact of Inadequate Case-mix Adjustment.分析方法的性能特征及病例组合调整不足的影响。
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2019;2019. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2019.1595649. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcer incident rates among hospitals that implement an education program for staff, patients, and family caregivers inclusive of an after discharge follow-up program in Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯,为员工、患者和家属护理人员实施教育计划,包括出院后随访计划的医院中,医院获得性压疮发生率。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1135-1141. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13459. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
9
Association of Do-Not-Resuscitate Patient Case Mix With Publicly Reported Risk-Standardized Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates.不复苏患者病例组合与公开报告的风险标准化医院死亡率和再入院率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10383.
10
Hospital Variation in Geriatric Surgical Safety for Emergency Operation.老年患者急诊手术的外科安全性的医院间差异。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jun;230(6):966-973.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.10.018. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A hospital-specific template for benchmarking its cost and quality.医院专用的成本和质量基准测试模板。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1475-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12226. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
2
Template matching for auditing hospital cost and quality.医院成本与质量审计的模板匹配。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1446-74. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12156. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
3
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.随机松弛,吉布斯分布,以及贝叶斯图像恢复。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1984 Jun;6(6):721-41. doi: 10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596.
4
The Hospital Compare mortality model and the volume-outcome relationship.医院比较死亡率模型与量效关系。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 1):1148-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01130.x.
5
Measuring quality for public reporting of health provider quality: making it meaningful to patients.衡量卫生提供者质量的公共报告质量:使患者有意义。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):264-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.153759. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
6
An empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery.一种基于经验的分析先天性心脏手术相关死亡率的工具。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Nov;138(5):1139-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.071.
7
Flexible random-effects models using Bayesian semi-parametric models: applications to institutional comparisons.使用贝叶斯半参数模型的灵活随机效应模型:在机构比较中的应用
Stat Med. 2007 Apr 30;26(9):2088-112. doi: 10.1002/sim.2666.
8
An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.一种适用于根据急性心肌梗死患者30天死亡率剖析医院绩效的行政索赔模型。
Circulation. 2006 Apr 4;113(13):1683-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.611186. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
9
Standards for statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.用于健康结果公开报告的统计模型标准:美国心脏协会护理质量与结果研究跨学科写作小组的科学声明:由流行病学与预防委员会和中风委员会共同发起。美国心脏病学会基金会认可。
Circulation. 2006 Jan 24;113(3):456-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.170769. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
10
Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cards.基准选择对医院报告卡结论的影响。
Am Heart J. 2004 Dec;148(6):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.047.