Mackillop Lucy H, Bartlett Katy, Birks Jacqueline, Farmer Andrew J, Gibson Oliver J, Kevat Dev A, Kenworthy Yvonne, Levy Jonathan C, Loerup Lise, Tarassenko Lionel, Velardo Carmelo, Hirst Jane E
Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 3, Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Women's Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e009702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702.
The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional face-to-face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit.
Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use.
Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print.
NCT01916694; Pre-results.
在英国,妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的患病率正在上升。良好的血糖控制可改善母婴结局。由于孕期生理变化迅速且过程不可预测,医疗保健专业人员需要对GDM患者进行频繁的临床检查。与传统的面对面或电话咨询相比,允许在家中进行血糖(BG)监测并将结果实时传输给医疗保健专业人员的新技术,有可能以更低的患者和医疗服务提供者成本,更方便地为女性提供高质量的医疗服务。我们开发了一个集成的GDM健康管理系统,旨在测试使用该系统与单一大型公共资助(国家医疗服务体系(NHS))产科单位的标准门诊护理相比,对孕妇血糖控制、成本、患者满意度以及母婴结局的影响。
将当前妊娠确诊为妊娠期糖尿病的女性个体随机分为GDM健康系统组和正常门诊就诊次数减半组或正常门诊护理组。主要结局是从招募到分娩时每组的平均血糖,计算时对血糖测量次数、餐前和餐后读数比例以及研究时间长度进行调整,并在两组之间进行比较。次要目标是比较两组在遵守分配的血糖监测方案、母婴结局、使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和其他血糖指标进行的血糖控制以及使用问卷评估的患者对护理的态度和资源使用情况。
两组的治疗阈值、饮食建议和临床管理相同。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并以电子和印刷形式传播。
NCT01916694;预结果。