Lee Jong Woo, Alam Javad, Llewellyn Nichelle, Hurwitz Shelley, Bubrick Ellen B, Sarkis Rani A, Weisholtz Daniel, Yu Hong, Putta Swapna, Dworetzky Barbara A, Pennell Page B
*Department of Neurology, The Edward B. Bromfield Epilepsy Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and †Department of Biostatistics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2016 May-Jun;39(3):128-31. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000144.
In patients who do not achieve seizure freedom on low-dose first-line monotherapy antiepileptic drug (AED), the current practice is to increase the AED to higher doses. For patients who fail low dose levetiracetam (LEV), a reasonable alternative to increasing dosage may be the addition of a low-dose adjunctive AED.
In this open-label, pilot trial, low-dose lacosamide (200 mg/d) was added to adult patients with breakthrough seizures on low-dose monotherapy LEV (≤1500 mg/d). Comparison was made with a retrospective historical control cohort in whom the dose of LEV was raised after a breakthrough seizure. The main objectives were to determine efficacy effect size and tolerability.
Twenty patients were recruited in the prospective polytherapy cohort, of whom 19 received at least 1 dose of adjunctive AED; the monotherapy cohort consisted of 36 patients. Six-month seizure freedom was achieved in 9 of 19 patients in the polytherapy cohort and in 15 of 36 patients in the monotherapy cohort (hazard ratio for seizure occurrence for polytherapy relative to monotherapy was 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.65; P = 0.49). There were treatment emergent adverse effects in 11 patients (61.1%) in the polytherapy cohort and 26 (72.2%) in the monotherapy cohort. Greater number of patients in the monotherapy cohort experienced irritability/depression (33.3% vs 5.6%, P < 0.05).
Low-dose polytherapy with LEV and lacosamide was well tolerated and efficacious. Further studies are needed to determine whether this is a reasonable alternative to high-dose LEV monotherapy.
对于采用低剂量一线单药抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗但未实现无癫痫发作的患者,目前的做法是将AED剂量增加至更高水平。对于低剂量左乙拉西坦(LEV)治疗失败的患者,增加剂量的合理替代方案可能是加用低剂量辅助AED。
在这项开放标签的试点试验中,低剂量拉科酰胺(200 mg/d)被添加到低剂量单药LEV(≤1500 mg/d)治疗下仍有突破性癫痫发作的成年患者中。与回顾性历史对照队列进行比较,该队列中患者在突破性癫痫发作后提高了LEV剂量。主要目标是确定疗效效应大小和耐受性。
前瞻性联合治疗队列招募了20名患者,其中19名接受了至少1剂辅助AED;单药治疗队列由36名患者组成。联合治疗队列中19名患者中的9名以及单药治疗队列中36名患者中的15名在6个月时实现了无癫痫发作(联合治疗相对于单药治疗癫痫发作的风险比为0.76;95%置信区间,0.35 - 1.65;P = 0.49)。联合治疗队列中有11名患者(61.1%)出现治疗中出现的不良反应,单药治疗队列中有26名患者(72.2%)出现。单药治疗队列中更多患者出现易怒/抑郁(33.3%对5.6%,P < 0.05)。
LEV与拉科酰胺的低剂量联合治疗耐受性良好且有效。需要进一步研究以确定这是否是高剂量LEV单药治疗的合理替代方案。